Difference between revisions of "Maiko National Park"
(Created page with "<!-- INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING SITE INFORMATION - Please consider whether any information you would like to add is sensitive and could be misused to harm apes. Please do no...") |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | <!-- INSTRUCTIONS FOR | + | <!-- INSTRUCTIONS FOR UPLOADING SITE INFORMATION |
− | + | - Wiki pages contain information in paragraphs, tables, lists, and images. | |
− | - | + | - Text and images are not restricted, and their formats can be chosen as desired. |
− | + | - Tables and lists are extracted as data, so the following restrictions apply to them: | |
− | + | 1) Table structure cannot be changed. | |
− | - Text | + | 2) List format should not change, i.e. they are comma separated lists, not bullet points or numbered lists. |
− | - Tables and | + | 3) To make information comparable across wiki pages, keywords must be taken from the list of permitted words, or added to the list of permitted keywords. This is why we use official lists, e.g., IUCN classification lists, in our tables. |
− | 1) Table structure cannot be changed | ||
− | 2) | ||
− | 3) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
--> | --> | ||
+ | [[Central Africa]] > [[Democratic Republic of the Congo]] > [[Maiko National Park]] | ||
− | + | = Summary = <!-- An overview of the site, with one sentence for each section. May include a site map --> | |
− | + | * Eastern chimpanzees (''Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii'') & Grauer's gorillas (''Gorilla beringei graueri'') are present in Maiko National Park. | |
− | = Summary = | + | * The chimpanzee and gorilla population trends are decreasing. |
− | + | * The site has a total size of 10,830 km². | |
− | * | + | * Civil conflict and the rise of armed groups controlling artisanal mines have led to widespread poaching in the area. |
− | * | + | * The Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund (DFGF) and Flora and Fauna International (FFI) have implemented community conservation projects near Maiko National Park. |
− | * | ||
− | |||
− | * | ||
− | * | ||
+ | = Site characteristics = <!-- A paragraph summary of physical and geographic aspects of the site, and a table of key information --> | ||
− | + | Located in eastern DRC, Maiko National Park is the only protected area that harbours Grauer’s gorilla alongside important populations of okapi, Congo peafowl and forest elephant (Maldonado et al. 2012). | |
− | + | '''Table 1. Basic site information for Maiko National Park''' | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | '''Table 1 | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="basic-information" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="basic-information" | ||
− | | Area | + | | Area <!-- Please include units: km2/ha e.g 200ha --> |
− | | | + | |10,830 km² |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Coordinates | + | |Coordinates |
− | | | + | | -0.438204 N, 27.470303 E |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Designation | + | |Designation |
− | + | |National Park | |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Habitat types | + | |Habitat types <!-- List IUCN Habitat Classification 3.0 categories present (without number), see link below --> |
− | | | + | |Sutropical/tropical moist lowland forest |
|} | |} | ||
− | [ | + | [https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/habitat-classification-scheme IUCN habitat categories] [[Site designations]] |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | = Ape status = | + | = Ape status = <!--An overview of ape population status (population sizes, trends, etc.), followed by a table of specific surveys and results --> |
+ | Based on the encounter rates of nests of the 2005 and 2014 surveys, both chimpanzee and gorilla populations at Maiko National Park declined by 95.24% and 99.52% respectively (Plumptre et al. 2015). However, due to security issues, the surveys conducted have been infrequent, and they only covered sections of the park. For a more accurate assessment on the status of great apes, a survey covering the entire area is needed (Plumptre et al. 2015). | ||
− | + | '''Table 2. Ape population estimates in Maiko National Park''' | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | '''Table 2 | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="population-estimate-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="population-estimate-table" | ||
! Species | ! Species | ||
! Year | ! Year | ||
− | ! Abundance estimate (95% | + | ! Abundance estimate (95% CI) |
− | ! Density estimate ( | + | ! Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) |
! Encounter rate (nests/km) | ! Encounter rate (nests/km) | ||
! Area | ! Area | ||
Line 72: | Line 53: | ||
! A.P.E.S. database ID | ! A.P.E.S. database ID | ||
|- | |- | ||
+ | |''Gorilla beringei graueri'' | ||
+ | |2011-2012 | ||
+ | |111-417 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |Maiko National Park North | ||
+ | |Informed guess | ||
+ | |Plumptre et al. 2015 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |''Gorilla beringei graueri'' | ||
+ | |2011-2012 | ||
+ | |306-866 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |Maiko National Park South | ||
+ | |Index survey (reconnaissance walk) | ||
+ | |Nixon et al. 2005, Nixon 2010, as cited by Plumptre et al. 2015 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |''Gorilla beringei graueri'' | ||
+ | |2014-2015 | ||
+ | |15 | ||
+ | |0.001 | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |Maiko National Park | ||
+ | |Data from the SMART patrols, recces, transects and occupancy surveys were used in the spatial occupancy analysis. | ||
+ | |Plumptre et al. 2015 | ||
+ | |Abundance and density estimates are based on encounter rate data (from transects whenever possible). | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |''Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii'' | ||
+ | |2014-2015 | ||
+ | |60 | ||
+ | |0.006 | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |Maiko National Park | ||
+ | |Data from the SMART patrols, recces, transects and occupancy surveys were used in the spatial occupancy analysis. | ||
+ | |Plumptre et al. 2015 | ||
+ | |Abundance and density estimates are based on encounter rate data (from transects whenever possible). | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 86: | Line 100: | ||
= Threats = <!-- a text overview of threats, followed by a table of key threats --> | = Threats = <!-- a text overview of threats, followed by a table of key threats --> | ||
+ | In eastern DRC, the civil war gave rise to the formation of armed groups that controlled artisanal mines in the area. Armed groups and miners relied on hunting bushmeat. Gorillas are highly prized as bushmeat because of their large size and they are killed relatively easily since they move in groups on the ground. Insecurity and lack of law enforcement continue to be a concern; the presence of militia groups have made it very difficult to assess great ape populations at the site and protect them (Plumptre et al. 2016). | ||
− | + | '''Table 3. Threats to apes in Maiko National Park''' | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | '''Table 3 | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="threats-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="threats-table" | ||
− | !align="left"|Category | + | !align="left"|Category <!-- PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE THE THREAT CATEGORIES --> |
− | !Specific threats | + | !Specific threats <!-- For specific threats, please use list of comma separated keywords from the IUCN list linked below --> |
− | !Threat level | + | !Threat level <!-- For threat level, please use keywords: low, medium, high, present, absent, unknown--> |
− | !Quantified severity <!-- e.g., encounter | + | !Quantified severity <!-- Enter any available quantification of the threat, e.g., the proportion of the area affected by the threat, hunting sign encounter rates--> |
− | !Description | + | !Description <!-- Add descriptive information --> |
− | !Year of threat | + | !Year of threat <!-- Enter specific year(s), “ongoing”, or “unknown”. If the threat is ongoing, please add the year of reference in parentheses --> |
|- | |- | ||
|1. Residential & commercial development | |1. Residential & commercial development | ||
− | | | + | |1.1 Housing & urban areas |
− | | | + | |Present, but threat severity is unknown |
− | | | + | |Less than 0.2 inhabitants/km² (BirdLife International 2020) |
− | | | + | |Rebels, miners and poachers live in temporary or more permanent settlements in the park (BirdLife International 2020). |
− | | | + | |Unknown |
|- | |- | ||
|2. Agriculture & aquaculture | |2. Agriculture & aquaculture | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 114: | Line 126: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|3. Energy production & mining | |3. Energy production & mining | ||
+ | |3.2 Mining & quarrying | ||
+ | |Present, but threat severity unknown | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Artisanal miners rely on bushmeat once they are deep in the forest; in addition, apes are also at risk from disease transmission from miners (Plumptre et al. 2015). |
− | | | + | |Ongoing (2015) |
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
|4. Transportation & service corridors | |4. Transportation & service corridors | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 128: | Line 140: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|5. Biological resource use | |5. Biological resource use | ||
+ | |5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | ||
+ | |High | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Hunting of gorillas in the southern part of the park has been recorded; outside of the park, a nearby population has been exterminated (Plumptre et al. 2015). |
− | | | + | |Ongoing (2015) |
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | |6. Human | + | |6. Human intrusion & disturbance |
− | |||
| | | | ||
+ | |Unknown | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 143: | Line 155: | ||
|7. Natural system modifications | |7. Natural system modifications | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 150: | Line 162: | ||
|8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | |8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 157: | Line 169: | ||
|9. Pollution | |9. Pollution | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 164: | Line 176: | ||
|10. Geological Events | |10. Geological Events | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Absent |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |11. Climate change & severe weather | + | | 11. Climate change & severe weather |
− | |||
| | | | ||
+ | |Unknown | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 178: | Line 190: | ||
|12. Other options | |12. Other options | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |Unknown | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |- |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
[https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/threat-classification-scheme IUCN Threats list] | [https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/threat-classification-scheme IUCN Threats list] | ||
+ | = Conservation activities = <!-- A summary of the conservation activities, followed by a table of key activities --> | ||
+ | The Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund (DFGF) and Flora and Fauna International (FFI) established three community conservation projects near Maiko. DFGF works at Nkubu Conservation Area, which covers about 1,000 square kilometers between Maiko National Park and Kahuzi-Biega National Park, a second stronghold for Gauer's gorillas. On the western edge of Maiko, FFI works in two unofficially designated reserves; REGOLU, founded in 2004, and REGUMUKI, founded in 2007. Both sites are in the process of becoming officially recognized community forests, and they cover 500 and 1,000 square kilometers respectively (Fritts 2019). | ||
− | + | '''Table 4. Conservation activities in Maiko National Park''' | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | '''Table 4 | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="conservation-actions-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="conservation-actions-table" | ||
− | !align="left"|Category | + | !align="left"|Category <!-- PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE THE CATEGORIES --> |
− | !Specific activity | + | !Specific activity <!-- For specific threats, please use list from the list linked below, OR enter “Not reported” --> |
− | !Description | + | !Description <!-- Add descriptive information --> |
− | !Year of activity | + | !Year of activity <!-- Add descriptive information --> |
|- | |- | ||
|1. Residential & commercial development | |1. Residential & commercial development | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|2. Agriculture & aquaculture | |2. Agriculture & aquaculture | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|3. Energy production & mining | |3. Energy production & mining | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|4. Transportation & service corridors | |4. Transportation & service corridors | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|5. Biological resource use | |5. Biological resource use | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |6. Human | + | |6. Human intrusion & disturbance |
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|7. Natural system modifications | |7. Natural system modifications | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | |8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|9. Pollution | |9. Pollution | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|10. Education & Awareness | |10. Education & Awareness | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|11. Habitat Protection | |11. Habitat Protection | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|12. Species Management | |12. Species Management | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|13. Livelihood; Economic & Other Incentives | |13. Livelihood; Economic & Other Incentives | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 270: | Line 278: | ||
[[Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)]] | [[Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)]] | ||
+ | = Challenges = <!-- Overview of challenges in ape conservation --> | ||
− | + | '''Table 5. Challenges reported for Maiko National Park''' | |
− | + | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="challenges-table" | |
− | + | !align="left"|Challenge <!-- Do not change categories --> | |
− | + | !Source <!-- Source for challenge mentioned --> | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |Civil unrest | |
− | + | |Maldonado et al. 2012 | |
− | '''Table 5 | + | |- |
− | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class=" | + | |Lack of logistical means |
− | !align="left"| | + | |Maldonado et al. 2012 |
− | !Source | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |Lack of law enforcement |
− | | | + | |Plumptre et al. 2015 |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
= Research activities = <!-- Overview of research activities --> | = Research activities = <!-- Overview of research activities --> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
===Documented behaviours=== <!-- List of any behaviours observed at the site, including citations --> | ===Documented behaviours=== <!-- List of any behaviours observed at the site, including citations --> | ||
− | '''Table 6 | + | '''Table 6. Ape behaviors reported for Maiko National Park''' |
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="behaviors-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="behaviors-table" | ||
− | !align="left"|Behavior | + | !align="left"|Behavior |
− | !Source | + | !Source |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | =External links= | ||
+ | [https://www.maikonationalpark.com/ Maiko National Park] | ||
===Relevant datasets=== | ===Relevant datasets=== | ||
[http://apesportal.eva.mpg.de/database/archiveMap A.P.E.S Portal] | [http://apesportal.eva.mpg.de/database/archiveMap A.P.E.S Portal] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
= References = | = References = | ||
− | + | Maldonado, O., Aveling, C., Cox, D., Nixon, S., Nishuli, R., Merlo, D., Pintea, L. & Williamson, E.A. (2012). Grauer’s Gorillas and Chimpanzees in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (Kahuzi-Biega, Maiko, Tayna and Itombwe Landscape): Conservation Action Plan 2012–2022. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group, Ministry of Environment, Nature Conservation & Tourism, Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature & the Jane Goodall Institute. 66pp. <br> | |
+ | Plumptre, A.J., Nixon, S., Critchlow, R., Vieilledent, G., Nishuli, R., Kirkby, A., Williamson, E.A., Hall, J.S. & Kujirakwinja, D. (2015). Status of Grauer’s gorilla and chimpanzees in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo: Historical and current distribution and abundance. Unpublished report to Arcus Foundation, USAID and US Fish and Wildlife Service. <br> | ||
+ | Plumptre, A.J., Nixon, S., Kujirakwinja, D.K., Vieilledent, G., Critchlow, R., Williamson E.A., et al. (2016). Catastrophic Decline of World's Largest Primate: 80% Loss of Grauer's Gorilla (Gorilla beringei graueri) Population Justifies Critically Endangered Status. PLoS ONE 11(10): e0162697. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162697 <br> | ||
+ | BirdLife International. (2020). Important Bird Areas factsheet: Maiko National Park. Online: http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/maiko-national-park-iba-congo-the-democratic-republic-of-the/text <br> | ||
+ | Fritts, R. (2019, July 16). Agriculture, mining, hunting push critically endangered gorillas to the brink. Online: https://news.mongabay.com/2019/07/agriculture-mining-hunting-push-critically-endangered-gorillas-to-the-brink/ <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | '''Page completed by:''' | + | '''Page completed by: '''A.P.E.S. Wiki Team''' Date:''' 03/12/2020 <!-- If you don't want to add your name, you can add "A.P.E.S. Wiki team" --> |
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Latest revision as of 12:26, 3 December 2020
Central Africa > Democratic Republic of the Congo > Maiko National Park
Summary
- Eastern chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) & Grauer's gorillas (Gorilla beringei graueri) are present in Maiko National Park.
- The chimpanzee and gorilla population trends are decreasing.
- The site has a total size of 10,830 km².
- Civil conflict and the rise of armed groups controlling artisanal mines have led to widespread poaching in the area.
- The Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund (DFGF) and Flora and Fauna International (FFI) have implemented community conservation projects near Maiko National Park.
Site characteristics
Located in eastern DRC, Maiko National Park is the only protected area that harbours Grauer’s gorilla alongside important populations of okapi, Congo peafowl and forest elephant (Maldonado et al. 2012).
Table 1. Basic site information for Maiko National Park
Area | 10,830 km² |
Coordinates | -0.438204 N, 27.470303 E |
Designation | National Park |
Habitat types | Sutropical/tropical moist lowland forest |
IUCN habitat categories Site designations
Ape status
Based on the encounter rates of nests of the 2005 and 2014 surveys, both chimpanzee and gorilla populations at Maiko National Park declined by 95.24% and 99.52% respectively (Plumptre et al. 2015). However, due to security issues, the surveys conducted have been infrequent, and they only covered sections of the park. For a more accurate assessment on the status of great apes, a survey covering the entire area is needed (Plumptre et al. 2015).
Table 2. Ape population estimates in Maiko National Park
Species | Year | Abundance estimate (95% CI) | Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | Encounter rate (nests/km) | Area | Method | Source | Comments | A.P.E.S. database ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gorilla beringei graueri | 2011-2012 | 111-417 | Maiko National Park North | Informed guess | Plumptre et al. 2015 | ||||
Gorilla beringei graueri | 2011-2012 | 306-866 | Maiko National Park South | Index survey (reconnaissance walk) | Nixon et al. 2005, Nixon 2010, as cited by Plumptre et al. 2015 | ||||
Gorilla beringei graueri | 2014-2015 | 15 | 0.001 | Maiko National Park | Data from the SMART patrols, recces, transects and occupancy surveys were used in the spatial occupancy analysis. | Plumptre et al. 2015 | Abundance and density estimates are based on encounter rate data (from transects whenever possible). | ||
Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii | 2014-2015 | 60 | 0.006 | Maiko National Park | Data from the SMART patrols, recces, transects and occupancy surveys were used in the spatial occupancy analysis. | Plumptre et al. 2015 | Abundance and density estimates are based on encounter rate data (from transects whenever possible). |
Threats
In eastern DRC, the civil war gave rise to the formation of armed groups that controlled artisanal mines in the area. Armed groups and miners relied on hunting bushmeat. Gorillas are highly prized as bushmeat because of their large size and they are killed relatively easily since they move in groups on the ground. Insecurity and lack of law enforcement continue to be a concern; the presence of militia groups have made it very difficult to assess great ape populations at the site and protect them (Plumptre et al. 2016).
Table 3. Threats to apes in Maiko National Park
Category | Specific threats | Threat level | Quantified severity | Description | Year of threat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Residential & commercial development | 1.1 Housing & urban areas | Present, but threat severity is unknown | Less than 0.2 inhabitants/km² (BirdLife International 2020) | Rebels, miners and poachers live in temporary or more permanent settlements in the park (BirdLife International 2020). | Unknown |
2. Agriculture & aquaculture | Unknown | ||||
3. Energy production & mining | 3.2 Mining & quarrying | Present, but threat severity unknown | Artisanal miners rely on bushmeat once they are deep in the forest; in addition, apes are also at risk from disease transmission from miners (Plumptre et al. 2015). | Ongoing (2015) | |
4. Transportation & service corridors | Unknown | ||||
5. Biological resource use | 5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | High | Hunting of gorillas in the southern part of the park has been recorded; outside of the park, a nearby population has been exterminated (Plumptre et al. 2015). | Ongoing (2015) | |
6. Human intrusion & disturbance | Unknown | ||||
7. Natural system modifications | Unknown | ||||
8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | Unknown | ||||
9. Pollution | Unknown | ||||
10. Geological Events | Absent | ||||
11. Climate change & severe weather | Unknown | ||||
12. Other options | Unknown |
Conservation activities
The Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund (DFGF) and Flora and Fauna International (FFI) established three community conservation projects near Maiko. DFGF works at Nkubu Conservation Area, which covers about 1,000 square kilometers between Maiko National Park and Kahuzi-Biega National Park, a second stronghold for Gauer's gorillas. On the western edge of Maiko, FFI works in two unofficially designated reserves; REGOLU, founded in 2004, and REGUMUKI, founded in 2007. Both sites are in the process of becoming officially recognized community forests, and they cover 500 and 1,000 square kilometers respectively (Fritts 2019).
Table 4. Conservation activities in Maiko National Park
Category | Specific activity | Description | Year of activity |
---|---|---|---|
1. Residential & commercial development | Not reported | ||
2. Agriculture & aquaculture | Not reported | ||
3. Energy production & mining | Not reported | ||
4. Transportation & service corridors | Not reported | ||
5. Biological resource use | Not reported | ||
6. Human intrusion & disturbance | Not reported | ||
7. Natural system modifications | Not reported | ||
8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | Not reported | ||
9. Pollution | Not reported | ||
10. Education & Awareness | Not reported | ||
11. Habitat Protection | Not reported | ||
12. Species Management | Not reported | ||
13. Livelihood; Economic & Other Incentives | Not reported |
Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)
Challenges
Table 5. Challenges reported for Maiko National Park
Challenge | Source |
---|---|
Civil unrest | Maldonado et al. 2012 |
Lack of logistical means | Maldonado et al. 2012 |
Lack of law enforcement | Plumptre et al. 2015 |
Research activities
Documented behaviours
Table 6. Ape behaviors reported for Maiko National Park
Behavior | Source |
---|---|
Not reported |
External links
Relevant datasets
References
Maldonado, O., Aveling, C., Cox, D., Nixon, S., Nishuli, R., Merlo, D., Pintea, L. & Williamson, E.A. (2012). Grauer’s Gorillas and Chimpanzees in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (Kahuzi-Biega, Maiko, Tayna and Itombwe Landscape): Conservation Action Plan 2012–2022. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group, Ministry of Environment, Nature Conservation & Tourism, Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature & the Jane Goodall Institute. 66pp.
Plumptre, A.J., Nixon, S., Critchlow, R., Vieilledent, G., Nishuli, R., Kirkby, A., Williamson, E.A., Hall, J.S. & Kujirakwinja, D. (2015). Status of Grauer’s gorilla and chimpanzees in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo: Historical and current distribution and abundance. Unpublished report to Arcus Foundation, USAID and US Fish and Wildlife Service.
Plumptre, A.J., Nixon, S., Kujirakwinja, D.K., Vieilledent, G., Critchlow, R., Williamson E.A., et al. (2016). Catastrophic Decline of World's Largest Primate: 80% Loss of Grauer's Gorilla (Gorilla beringei graueri) Population Justifies Critically Endangered Status. PLoS ONE 11(10): e0162697. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162697
BirdLife International. (2020). Important Bird Areas factsheet: Maiko National Park. Online: http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/maiko-national-park-iba-congo-the-democratic-republic-of-the/text
Fritts, R. (2019, July 16). Agriculture, mining, hunting push critically endangered gorillas to the brink. Online: https://news.mongabay.com/2019/07/agriculture-mining-hunting-push-critically-endangered-gorillas-to-the-brink/
Page completed by: A.P.E.S. Wiki Team Date: 03/12/2020