Difference between revisions of "Kankan Faunal Reserve"

From A.P.E.S. wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
   3) Keywords must be taken from the list of permitted words, or added to the list of permitted keywords. A link to the keyword list page is found adjacent  
 
   3) Keywords must be taken from the list of permitted words, or added to the list of permitted keywords. A link to the keyword list page is found adjacent  
 
     to the relevant table or keyword list. This ensures that the same keyword always refers to the same concept, e.g. Everybody uses "Industrial mining",  
 
     to the relevant table or keyword list. This ensures that the same keyword always refers to the same concept, e.g. Everybody uses "Industrial mining",  
−
     rather than several keywords such as "Industrial mining", "Large-scale mining", and "Mining".  
+
     rather than several keywords such as "Industrial mining", "Large-scale mining", and "Mining". [[File: Map_GIN_KankanFR_georef_20200121.png | 400px | thumb| right |Kankan Faunal Reserve (Guinea) © A.P.E.S. Wiki Team]]
 +
 
 
-->
 
-->
 
<!-- Please add information for this site -->
 
<!-- Please add information for this site -->
 
[[West Africa]] > [[Republic of Guinea]] > [[Kankan Faunal Reserve]]
 
[[West Africa]] > [[Republic of Guinea]] > [[Kankan Faunal Reserve]]
−
 
−
[[File: Map_GIN_KankanFR_georef_20200121.png | 400px | thumb| right |Kankan Faunal Reserve (Guinea) © A.P.E.S. Wiki Team]]
 
  
 
= Summary =  <!-- An overview of the site, with a one sentence overview of each of the following sections. can include a site map -->
 
= Summary =  <!-- An overview of the site, with a one sentence overview of each of the following sections. can include a site map -->
  
−
* Western chimpanzees ([https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/15935/17989872 ''Pan troglodytes verus'']) are present in Kankan Faunal Reserve.  
+
* Western chimpanzees (''Pan troglodytes verus'') are present in Kankan Faunal Reserve.  
 
* Chimpanzee densities are too low to estimate the total size of the population.  
 
* Chimpanzee densities are too low to estimate the total size of the population.  
 
* The chimpanzee population trend is unknown.  
 
* The chimpanzee population trend is unknown.  
Line 30: Line 29:
 
Kankan Faunal Reserve is part of the Sankarani-Fié Ramsar, situated within the Sankarani River basin ([https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/1167  Ramsar 2017]). This Ramsar site is characterized by important fish spawning grounds (Ramsar 2017).
 
Kankan Faunal Reserve is part of the Sankarani-Fié Ramsar, situated within the Sankarani River basin ([https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/1167  Ramsar 2017]). This Ramsar site is characterized by important fish spawning grounds (Ramsar 2017).
  
−
 
+
'''Table 1. Basic site information for Kankan Faunal Reserve'''
−
 
 
−
'''Table 1: Basic site information for Kankan Faunal Reserve'''
 
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="basic-information"
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="basic-information"
 
|Area            <!-- Please include units: km2/ha e.g 200ha    -->
 
|Area            <!-- Please include units: km2/ha e.g 200ha    -->
Line 38: Line 35:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Coordinates
 
|Coordinates
−
|9.77 N, 8.38 W
+
|9.77, -8.38
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Designation      <!-- National Park, Nature Reserve, etc.  -->
 
|Designation      <!-- National Park, Nature Reserve, etc.  -->
Line 46: Line 43:
 
|Dry savanna, permanent rivers, arable land
 
|Dry savanna, permanent rivers, arable land
 
|}
 
|}
−
[http://www.unitar.org/hiroshima/sites/unitar.org.hiroshima/files/Annex%201%20-%20IUCN%20Classification%20Schemes.pdf IUCN habitat categories]  [[Site designations]]
+
[https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/habitat-classification-scheme IUCN habitat categories]  [[Site designations]]
−
<br>
 
  
 
= Ape status =  <!-- a text overview of ape status (population sizes, trends etc), followed by a table of specific surveys and results -->
 
= Ape status =  <!-- a text overview of ape status (population sizes, trends etc), followed by a table of specific surveys and results -->
Line 53: Line 49:
 
In the nationwide chimpanzee survey, Rebecca Kormos found no signs of chimpanzees in the northern part of Kankan Faunal Reserve and suggested that chimpanzee might be extinct in the area or persist at very low numbers (Ham 1998). According to Fleury-Brugière & Brugière (2010), a survey by Dufour (2007) observed chimpanzee nests in the southern part of the reserve. In 2009 the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation surveyed the central part of the reserve, but found no signs of chimpanzees on the 74 km of transects that were surveyed (WCF 2012). The survey team also conducted a questionnaire survey and local residents reported that chimpanzees are present in the area. The WCF team also encountered a small group of chimpanzees the western sector of Kankan, and one group in the northern part of the reserve (WCF 2012).
 
In the nationwide chimpanzee survey, Rebecca Kormos found no signs of chimpanzees in the northern part of Kankan Faunal Reserve and suggested that chimpanzee might be extinct in the area or persist at very low numbers (Ham 1998). According to Fleury-Brugière & Brugière (2010), a survey by Dufour (2007) observed chimpanzee nests in the southern part of the reserve. In 2009 the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation surveyed the central part of the reserve, but found no signs of chimpanzees on the 74 km of transects that were surveyed (WCF 2012). The survey team also conducted a questionnaire survey and local residents reported that chimpanzees are present in the area. The WCF team also encountered a small group of chimpanzees the western sector of Kankan, and one group in the northern part of the reserve (WCF 2012).
  
−
 
+
'''Table 2. Ape population estimates in Kankan Faunal Reserve'''
−
'''Table 2: Great ape population estimates in Kankan Faunal Reserve'''
 
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="population-estimate-table"
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="population-estimate-table"
 
! Species
 
! Species
 
! Year
 
! Year
−
! Abundance estimate (95% confidence interval)
+
! Abundance estimate (95% CI)
−
! Density estimate (per km²)
+
! Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI)
 
! Encounter rate (nests/km)
 
! Encounter rate (nests/km)
 
! Area
 
! Area
Line 94: Line 89:
 
There are approximately 17,000 people living in the reserve (WCF 2012). During their survey of the northern part of Kankan, the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation found agriculture to be the most prevalent threat, with 0.77 signs/km, followed by roads (WCF 2012). However, there were only few signs of hunting and wood extraction (WCF 2012). In contrast, the evaluation of management effectiveness of protected areas based on questionnaires found poaching to be an important threat (METT 2009). Most human activities were found in the western part of the reserve close to the town of Kankan (WCF 2012).
 
There are approximately 17,000 people living in the reserve (WCF 2012). During their survey of the northern part of Kankan, the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation found agriculture to be the most prevalent threat, with 0.77 signs/km, followed by roads (WCF 2012). However, there were only few signs of hunting and wood extraction (WCF 2012). In contrast, the evaluation of management effectiveness of protected areas based on questionnaires found poaching to be an important threat (METT 2009). Most human activities were found in the western part of the reserve close to the town of Kankan (WCF 2012).
  
−
 
+
'''Table 3. Threats to great apes in Kankan Faunal Reserve'''
−
'''Table 3: Threats to great apes in Kankan Faunal Reserve'''
 
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="threats-table"
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="threats-table"
 
!align="left"|Category  <!-- Do not change threat categories -->
 
!align="left"|Category  <!-- Do not change threat categories -->
Line 105: Line 99:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|1. Residential & commercial development
 
|1. Residential & commercial development
−
|1.1. Housing & urban areas
+
|1.1 Housing & urban areas
 
|Medium
 
|Medium
 
|
 
|
Line 112: Line 106:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2. Agriculture & aquaculture
 
|2. Agriculture & aquaculture
−
|2.1. Annual & Perennial Non-Timber Crops
+
|2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops
 
|High
 
|High
 
|0.77 signs of agriculture/km (56 signs of agriculture, survey effort: 73.138 km, WCF 2012)
 
|0.77 signs of agriculture/km (56 signs of agriculture, survey effort: 73.138 km, WCF 2012)
Line 126: Line 120:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|4. Transportation & service corridors
 
|4. Transportation & service corridors
−
|4.1. Roads & railroads
+
|4.1 Roads & railroads
 
|High
 
|High
 
|0.72 roads/km (53 roads, survey effort: 73.138 km, WCF 2012)
 
|0.72 roads/km (53 roads, survey effort: 73.138 km, WCF 2012)
Line 133: Line 127:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|5. Biological resource use
 
|5. Biological resource use
−
|5.1. Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals
+
|5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals
 
|Medium
 
|Medium
 
|0.07 signs of hunting/km (5 signs of hunting, survey effort: 73.138 km, WCF 2012)
 
|0.07 signs of hunting/km (5 signs of hunting, survey effort: 73.138 km, WCF 2012)
Line 140: Line 134:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
−
|5.3. Logging & wood harvesting
+
|5.3 Logging & wood harvesting
 
|Low
 
|Low
 
|0.01 signs of wood extraction/km (1 sign of wood extraction, survey effort: 73.138 km, WCF 2012)
 
|0.01 signs of wood extraction/km (1 sign of wood extraction, survey effort: 73.138 km, WCF 2012)
Line 147: Line 141:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
−
|5.4. Fishing & harvesting aquatic resources
+
|5.4 Fishing & harvesting aquatic resources
 
|Medium
 
|Medium
 
|
 
|
Line 161: Line 155:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|7. Natural system modifications
 
|7. Natural system modifications
−
|7.1. Fire & Fire suppression
+
|7.1 Fire & fire suppression
 
|Medium
 
|Medium
 
|0.01 signs of fire/km (1 sign of fire, survey effort: 73.138 km, WCF 2012)
 
|0.01 signs of fire/km (1 sign of fire, survey effort: 73.138 km, WCF 2012)
Line 209: Line 203:
 
The non-governmental organization [http://www.non-nobis.org/index.php  Non Nobis] is active in the western part of Kankan. This area is called “Diwasi”. The NGO is especially active in the fields of sanitation and education. It is not clear what kind of environmental activities are or have been implemented. The NGO, however, seems to propose to create a protected area. It has also been suggested that a privately owned protected area for game hunting will be created but the specificity and who is leading these efforts is not clear (WCF 2012).
 
The non-governmental organization [http://www.non-nobis.org/index.php  Non Nobis] is active in the western part of Kankan. This area is called “Diwasi”. The NGO is especially active in the fields of sanitation and education. It is not clear what kind of environmental activities are or have been implemented. The NGO, however, seems to propose to create a protected area. It has also been suggested that a privately owned protected area for game hunting will be created but the specificity and who is leading these efforts is not clear (WCF 2012).
  
−
 
+
'''Table 4. Conservation activities in Kankan Faunal Reserve'''
−
'''Table 4: Conservation activities in Kankan Faunal Reserve'''
 
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="conservation-actions-table"
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="conservation-actions-table"
 
!align="left"|Category  <!-- Do not change threat categories -->
 
!align="left"|Category  <!-- Do not change threat categories -->
Line 285: Line 278:
 
[[Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)]]
 
[[Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)]]
  
−
= Impediments = <!-- Overview of impediments to ape conservation -->
+
= Challenges = <!-- Overview of impediments to ape conservation -->
  
 
The report on the evaluation of management activities stated that the park employees are paid by the state but that there is no additional budget to manage the park. It also stated a lack of infrastructure and equipment (METT 2009).
 
The report on the evaluation of management activities stated that the park employees are paid by the state but that there is no additional budget to manage the park. It also stated a lack of infrastructure and equipment (METT 2009).
  
  
−
'''Table 5: Impediments reported for Kankan Faunal Reserve'''
+
'''Table 5. Challenges reported for Kankan Faunal Reserve'''
−
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="impediments-table"
+
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="challenges-table"
−
!align="left"|Impediment <!-- Do not change categories -->
+
!align="left"|Challenge <!-- Do not change categories -->
 
!Source  <!-- source for impediment mentioned -->
 
!Source  <!-- source for impediment mentioned -->
 
|-
 
|-
Line 310: Line 303:
  
  
−
'''Table 6: Great ape behaviors reported for Kankan Faunal Reserve'''
+
'''Table 6. Great ape behaviors reported for Kankan Faunal Reserve'''
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="behaviors-table"
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="behaviors-table"
 
!align="left"|Behavior  <!-- Do not change categories -->
 
!align="left"|Behavior  <!-- Do not change categories -->
Line 320: Line 313:
 
|}
 
|}
  
−
 
−
===Relevant datasets===
 
−
[http://apesportal.eva.mpg.de/database/archiveMap A.P.E.S Portal]
 
−
 
−
<br>
 
  
 
= References =
 
= References =

Latest revision as of 14:45, 29 July 2023

West Africa > Republic of Guinea > Kankan Faunal Reserve

Summary[edit]

  • Western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) are present in Kankan Faunal Reserve.
  • Chimpanzee densities are too low to estimate the total size of the population.
  • The chimpanzee population trend is unknown.
  • This site has a total size of 5,314 km².
  • Agricultural activities are the most prevalent threat to chimpanzees.
  • The extent of on-going conservation activities is unknown.
  • Kankan Faunal Reserve features a high diversity of antelopes and is part of the Sankarani-Fié Ramsar site.

Site characteristics[edit]

Kankan Faunal Reserve (also called “Réserve Naturelle de Kankan”) is located in western Guinea and shares a border with Côte d’Ivoire. It is part of the region “Haute-Guinée” and the prefecture Kankan. Kankan was initially established as a national park in 1925 when Guinea was still a French colony (Brugière & Kormos 2009). The Guinean government now recognizes Kankan as a ‘Faunal Reserve’ but its legal status is not clear (Brugière & Kormos 2009). The reserve does not have a designated IUCN category nor is it listed in the World Database on Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2018). Kankan Faunal Reserve covers a total area of 5,314.48 km2 and is characterized by savanna habitat with permanent waterways (Brugière & Kormos 2009). The reserve is an important area for antelopes as it has the highest diversity in antelope species across Guinea, including the three rarest species found in Guinea (Brugière 2012). The presence of leopards (Panthera pardus), baboons (Papio sp.”), green monkeys (Chlorocebus sabaeus) and hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius) has been confirmed (Brugière & Kormos 2009, WCF 2012). Lions (Panthera leo) might also still be present in the reserve (Henschel et al. 2014) Kankan Faunal Reserve is part of the Sankarani-Fié Ramsar, situated within the Sankarani River basin (Ramsar 2017). This Ramsar site is characterized by important fish spawning grounds (Ramsar 2017).

Table 1. Basic site information for Kankan Faunal Reserve

Area 5,314.48 km²
Coordinates 9.77, -8.38
Designation Faunal Reserve (but legal status is not clear and IUCN Management Category not reported)
Habitat types Dry savanna, permanent rivers, arable land

IUCN habitat categories Site designations

Ape status[edit]

In the nationwide chimpanzee survey, Rebecca Kormos found no signs of chimpanzees in the northern part of Kankan Faunal Reserve and suggested that chimpanzee might be extinct in the area or persist at very low numbers (Ham 1998). According to Fleury-Brugière & Brugière (2010), a survey by Dufour (2007) observed chimpanzee nests in the southern part of the reserve. In 2009 the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation surveyed the central part of the reserve, but found no signs of chimpanzees on the 74 km of transects that were surveyed (WCF 2012). The survey team also conducted a questionnaire survey and local residents reported that chimpanzees are present in the area. The WCF team also encountered a small group of chimpanzees the western sector of Kankan, and one group in the northern part of the reserve (WCF 2012).

Table 2. Ape population estimates in Kankan Faunal Reserve

Species Year Abundance estimate (95% CI) Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) Encounter rate (nests/km) Area Method Source Comments A.P.E.S. database ID
Pan troglodytes verus Unknown Present Southern part of the reserve Unknown Dufour 2007 as found in Fleury-Brugière & Brugière (2010) The original report by Dufour was not found in the public domain
Pan troglodytes verus 2009 0 Central part of the reserve Line transects (Distance) WCF 2012 Total survey effort: 74 km, no signs of chimpanzees found, but local residence reported presence of chimpanzees

Threats[edit]

There are approximately 17,000 people living in the reserve (WCF 2012). During their survey of the northern part of Kankan, the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation found agriculture to be the most prevalent threat, with 0.77 signs/km, followed by roads (WCF 2012). However, there were only few signs of hunting and wood extraction (WCF 2012). In contrast, the evaluation of management effectiveness of protected areas based on questionnaires found poaching to be an important threat (METT 2009). Most human activities were found in the western part of the reserve close to the town of Kankan (WCF 2012).

Table 3. Threats to great apes in Kankan Faunal Reserve

Category Specific threats Threat level Quantified severity Description Year of threat
1. Residential & commercial development 1.1 Housing & urban areas Medium 17,000 people live in the reserve (WCF 2012) Ongoing (2012)
2. Agriculture & aquaculture 2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops High 0.77 signs of agriculture/km (56 signs of agriculture, survey effort: 73.138 km, WCF 2012) Highest encounter rate found for signs of agricultural (WCF 2012) Ongoing (2012)
3. Energy production & mining Absent
4. Transportation & service corridors 4.1 Roads & railroads High 0.72 roads/km (53 roads, survey effort: 73.138 km, WCF 2012) Second highest encounter rate (WCF 2012) Ongoing (2012)
5. Biological resource use 5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals Medium 0.07 signs of hunting/km (5 signs of hunting, survey effort: 73.138 km, WCF 2012) Few signs of hunting encountered by WCF survey (WCF 2012), but METT questionnaire survey found it to be an important threat (METT 2009) Ongoing (2009, 2012)
5.3 Logging & wood harvesting Low 0.01 signs of wood extraction/km (1 sign of wood extraction, survey effort: 73.138 km, WCF 2012) Few signs of wood harvesting encountered (WCF 2012), commercial wood extraction present (METT 2009) Ongoing (2009, 2012)
5.4 Fishing & harvesting aquatic resources Medium Fishing in rivers with fine mesh nets (METT 2009) Ongoing (2009)
6. Human intrusions & disturbance Absent
7. Natural system modifications 7.1 Fire & fire suppression Medium 0.01 signs of fire/km (1 sign of fire, survey effort: 73.138 km, WCF 2012) Few signs of fire (WCF 2012), but METT questionnaire survey found it to used frequently by hunters (METT 2009) Ongoing (2009, 2012)
8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases Unknown
9. Pollution 9.1 Domestic & urban waste water Present Fishers use a toxic plant for fishing which leads to water pollution, plant reduces oxygen content in water and degrades river ecosystem (METT 2009) Since 2007
10. Geological Events Absent
11. Climate change & severe weather Unknown
12. Other options Absent

IUCN Threats list

Conservation activities[edit]

The non-governmental organization Non Nobis is active in the western part of Kankan. This area is called “Diwasi”. The NGO is especially active in the fields of sanitation and education. It is not clear what kind of environmental activities are or have been implemented. The NGO, however, seems to propose to create a protected area. It has also been suggested that a privately owned protected area for game hunting will be created but the specificity and who is leading these efforts is not clear (WCF 2012).

Table 4. Conservation activities in Kankan Faunal Reserve

Category Specific activity Description Year of activity
1. Residential & commercial development Not reported
2. Agriculture & aquaculture Not reported
3. Energy production & mining Not reported
4. Transportation & service corridors Not reported
5. Biological resource use Not reported
6. Human intrusions & disturbance Not reported
7. Natural system modifications Not reported
8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases Not reported
9. Pollution Not reported
10. Education & Awareness 10.1. Educate local communities about primates and sustainable use Environmental awareness raising activities targeted at reducing fires and poaching (but not explicitly targeted towards primates, METT 2009) Unknown (2009)
11. Habitat Protection 11.2. Legally protect primate habitat Designated as Faunal Reserve since 1925 but current legal status is unclear (METT 2009) Since 1925
12. Species Management Not reported
13. Livelihood; Economic & Other Incentives Not reported

Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)

Challenges[edit]

The report on the evaluation of management activities stated that the park employees are paid by the state but that there is no additional budget to manage the park. It also stated a lack of infrastructure and equipment (METT 2009).


Table 5. Challenges reported for Kankan Faunal Reserve

Challenge Source
Lack of financial means METT 2009
Lack of technical means METT 2009

Research activities[edit]

Two wildlife surveys have been conducted in Kankan Faunal Reserve: one by Sylvain Dufour for Sylvatrop (Dufour 2007) and one by the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation in 2009 (WCF 2012).


Documented behaviours[edit]

Table 6. Great ape behaviors reported for Kankan Faunal Reserve

Behavior Source
Not reported


References[edit]

Brugière D, Kormos R. 2009. Review of the protected area network in Guinea, West Africa, and recommendations for new sites for biodiversity conservation, Biodiversity and Conservation, 18:847
Brugière D. 2012. Identifying priority areas for the conservation of antelopes in the Republic of Guinea, West Africa, using the complementarity approach, Oryx, 46(2): 253-259
Dufour S. 2007. Programme de gestion communautaire et participative de la faune sauvage dans la Réserve de Faune de Kankan, République de Guinée. Conakry: Rapport pour Sylvatrop
Fleury-Brugière M.-C., Brugière D. 2010. High Population Density of Pan troglodytes verus in the Haut Niger National Park, Republic of Guinea: Implications for Local and Regional Conservation, International Journal of Primatology, 31: 383-392
Ham R. 1998. Nationwide chimpanzee census and large mammal survey Republic of Guinea.
Henschel P et al. 2014. The lion in West Africa is Critically Endangered, PLoS ONE 9(1): e83500.
METT. 2009. Management Effectiveness Evaluations – Reserve de faune de Kankan et parc Diwasi. Online: papaco.org
Non Nobis Online: www.non-nobis.org
Ramsar. 2017. Online: Ramsar 2017
UNEP-WCMC, IUCN. 2018. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA), Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN Online: www.protectedplanet.net
WCF. 2012. Etat de la faune et des menaces dans les aires protégées terrestres et principales zones de forte biodiversité de Rep. de Guinée. Report. Wild Chimpanzee Foundation, Sangaredi, Republic of Guinea. Online: www.wildchimps.org


Page completed by: A.P.E.S. Wiki Team Date: 17/12/2018

Retrieved from "https://wiki.iucnapesportal.org/index.php?title=Kankan_Faunal_Reserve&oldid=6835"