Difference between revisions of "Governance types"
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The following categories are based on the IUCN | + | The following categories are based on the IUCN Governance Types for Protected Areas (Borrini-Feyerabend et al. 2013). |
* Governance by government | * Governance by government | ||
Latest revision as of 09:40, 18 June 2024
The following categories are based on the IUCN Governance Types for Protected Areas (Borrini-Feyerabend et al. 2013).
- Governance by government
Includes federal or national ministry or agency in charge; sub-national ministry or agency in charge (e.g., at regional, provincial, municipal level); and government-delegated management (e.g., to an NGO).
- Shared governance
Includes transboundary governance (formal arrangements between one or more sovereign States or Territories); collaborative governance (through various ways in which diverse actors and institutions work together); and joint governance (pluralist board or other multy-party governing body.
- Private governance
Includes conserved areas established and run by:individual landowners, non-profit organisations (e.g., NGOs, universities), and for-profit organisations (e.g., corporate landowners).
- Governance by indigenous peoples and local communities
Includes indigenous peoples’ conserved territories and areas (established and run by indigenous peoples), and community conserved areas and territories (established and run by local communities).
Borrini-Feyerabend, G., N. Dudley, T. Jaeger, B. Lassen, N. Pathak Broome, A. Phillips and T. Sandwith (2013). Governance of Protected Areas: From understanding to action. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 20, Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. xvi + 124pp.