Difference between revisions of "Enablers"
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
3.3 Volunteer workforce <br> | 3.3 Volunteer workforce <br> | ||
3.4 Anticipated advantages/benefits of conservation activities <br> | 3.4 Anticipated advantages/benefits of conservation activities <br> | ||
− | 3.5 Positive past experience/associations with conservation | + | 3.5 Positive past experience/associations with conservation <br> |
3.6 Local community engagement and support <br> | 3.6 Local community engagement and support <br> | ||
− | 3.7 Site has high cultural/religious value <br> | + | 3.7 Site has a high cultural/religious value <br> |
'''4. Institutional support''' <br> | '''4. Institutional support''' <br> | ||
4.1 Effective legislation and law enforcement <br> | 4.1 Effective legislation and law enforcement <br> |
Latest revision as of 14:35, 18 June 2024
1. Site management
1.1 Effective leadership
1.2 Effective coordination
1.3 Adaptive management practices
2. Resources and capacity
2.1 Sufficient staff
2.2 Sufficient funding
2.3 Continuous/long-term funding
2.4 Adequate data to inform and evaluate conservation actions
2.5 Sufficient capacity/expertise to advise, design, or implement actions
2.6 External partnerships that add expertise or resources
3. Engaged community
3.1 Strong local environmental knowledge
3.2 Local taboos in favor of conservation
3.3 Volunteer workforce
3.4 Anticipated advantages/benefits of conservation activities
3.5 Positive past experience/associations with conservation
3.6 Local community engagement and support
3.7 Site has a high cultural/religious value
4. Institutional support
4.1 Effective legislation and law enforcement
4.2 Strong government support
4.3 Strong transboundary cooperation
5. Ecological context
5.1 Ecological characteristics (e.g. terrain) conducive to conservation
6. Safety and stability
6.1 Political and economic stability
6.2 Social and civil security
Other (specify)