Difference between revisions of "Sapo National Park"
(31 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
to the relevant table or keyword list. This ensures that the same keyword always refers to the same concept, e.g. Everybody uses "Industrial mining", | to the relevant table or keyword list. This ensures that the same keyword always refers to the same concept, e.g. Everybody uses "Industrial mining", | ||
rather than several keywords such as "Industrial mining", "Large-scale mining", and "Mining". | rather than several keywords such as "Industrial mining", "Large-scale mining", and "Mining". | ||
+ | [[File: Map_LBR_Sapo_NP.png | 400px | thumb| right | Sapo National Park (Liberia) © A.P.E.S. Wiki Team]] | ||
+ | |||
--> | --> | ||
− | |||
[[West Africa]] > [[Liberia]] > [[Sapo National Park]] | [[West Africa]] > [[Liberia]] > [[Sapo National Park]] | ||
= Summary = <!-- An overview of the site, with a one sentence overview of each of the following sections. can include a site map --> | = Summary = <!-- An overview of the site, with a one sentence overview of each of the following sections. can include a site map --> | ||
− | + | <div style="float: right"> | |
− | * Western chimpanzees ( | + | {{#display_map: height=200px | width=300px | scrollzoom=off | zoom=5 | layers= OpenStreetMap, OpenTopoMap |
− | * It has been estimated that 1,055 (CI: 595-1,870) individuals occur in the site. | + | |5.378432, -8.496117~[[Sapo National Park]]~Western Chimpanzee |
+ | }} | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | * Western chimpanzees (''Pan troglodytes verus'') are present in Sapo National Park. | ||
+ | * It has been estimated that 1,055 (CI: 595-1,870) individuals occur in the site. | ||
* The chimpanzee population trend is stable. | * The chimpanzee population trend is stable. | ||
− | * | + | * The park has a total size of 1,804 km². |
− | * Key threats to chimpanzees are poaching and illegal mining. | + | * Key threats to chimpanzees are poaching and illegal mining. |
− | * Conservation activities have focused on long-term bio-monitoring and law enforcement. | + | * Conservation activities have focused on long-term bio-monitoring and law enforcement. |
− | * Sapo National Park is Liberia's first protected area, established in 1983. | + | * Sapo National Park is Liberia's first protected area, established in 1983. |
= Site characteristics = <!-- A paragraph summary of physical and geographic aspects of the site, and a table of key information --> | = Site characteristics = <!-- A paragraph summary of physical and geographic aspects of the site, and a table of key information --> | ||
− | Located in southeastern Liberia, Sapo National Park is Liberia's first protected area and represents one of the most intact forest ecosystems of the country (Tweh et al. 2018). The area of the park was extended from 1,304 km² to 1,804 km² in 2003 (Tweh et al. 2018). The park forms part of the Upper Guinean Forest ecosystem, and contains high levels of biodiversity (N'Goran et al. 2010). In addition to the western chimpanzee, other endangered and vulnerable species inhabit the site, including forest elephants (''Loxodonta africana''), pygmy hippopotamus (''Hexaprotodon liberiensis''), Jentink’s duiker (''Cephalophus jentinki''), red colobus (''Piliocolobus badius''), and Diana monkeys (''Cercopithecus diana diana'' | + | Located in southeastern Liberia, Sapo National Park is Liberia's first protected area and represents one of the most intact forest ecosystems of the country (Tweh et al. 2018). The area of the park was extended from 1,304 km² to 1,804 km² in 2003 (Tweh et al. 2018). The park forms part of the Upper Guinean Forest ecosystem, and contains high levels of biodiversity (N'Goran et al. 2010). The park is a low elevation tropical humid rainforest. Elevation in the southeastern area is approximately 100m with gently rolling hills while in the north, the elevation is approximately 400m in the north with steep ridges (Peal & Kranz 1990). In addition to the western chimpanzee, other endangered and vulnerable species inhabit the site, including forest elephants (''Loxodonta africana''), pygmy hippopotamus (''Hexaprotodon liberiensis''), Jentink’s duiker (''Cephalophus jentinki''), red colobus (''Piliocolobus badius''), and Diana monkeys (''Cercopithecus diana diana'', N'Goran 2010). |
− | '''Table 1 | + | |
+ | '''Table 1. Basic site information for Sapo National Park''' | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="basic-information" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="basic-information" | ||
− | | Area <!-- Please include units: km2/ha e.g 200ha --> | + | | Area: <!-- Please include units: km2/ha e.g 200ha --> |
− | |1804 km² | + | |1804 km² |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Coordinates | + | |Coordinates <!-- coords --> |
− | |5. | + | |5.378432, -8.496117 |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Designation <!-- | + | |Designation: <!-- Protected area, Forestry concession, Community reserve --> |
− | |National | + | |National park |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Habitat types <!-- List IUCN Habitat Classification 3.0 categories present (Without number), see link below --> | + | |Habitat types: <!-- List IUCN Habitat Classification 3.0 categories present (Without number), see link below --> |
− | |Subtropical/ | + | |Subtropical/tropical moist lowland |
|} | |} | ||
[http://www.unitar.org/hiroshima/sites/unitar.org.hiroshima/files/Annex%201%20-%20IUCN%20Classification%20Schemes.pdf IUCN habitat categories] [[Site designations]] | [http://www.unitar.org/hiroshima/sites/unitar.org.hiroshima/files/Annex%201%20-%20IUCN%20Classification%20Schemes.pdf IUCN habitat categories] [[Site designations]] | ||
− | |||
= Ape status = <!-- a text overview of ape status (population sizes, trends etc), followed by a table of specific surveys and results --> | = Ape status = <!-- a text overview of ape status (population sizes, trends etc), followed by a table of specific surveys and results --> | ||
− | A survey in 1982 (one year before the establishment of the park), confirmed the presence of chimpanzees in the Sapo forest (Anderson et al. 1983). Based on the estimates from two surveys, one in 2009 (N'Goran et al. 2010) and a second one in 2017 (Tweh et al. 2018), the chimpanzee population in the park has remained relatively stable, with an estimated abundance of approximately 1,055 individuals. | + | A survey in 1982 (one year before the establishment of the park), confirmed the presence of chimpanzees in the Sapo forest (Anderson et al. 1983). Based on the estimates from two surveys, one in 2009 (N'Goran et al. 2010) and a second one in 2017 (Tweh et al. 2018), the chimpanzee population in the park has remained relatively stable, with an estimated abundance of approximately 1,055 individuals. |
− | '''Table 2 | + | '''Table 2. Great ape population estimates in Sapo National Park''' |
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="population-estimate-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="population-estimate-table" | ||
! Species | ! Species | ||
! Year | ! Year | ||
− | ! Abundance estimate (95% | + | ! Abundance estimate (95% CI) |
− | ! Density estimate ( | + | ! Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) |
− | ! Encounter rate | + | ! Encounter rate |
! Area | ! Area | ||
! Method | ! Method | ||
Line 60: | Line 65: | ||
! A.P.E.S. database ID | ! A.P.E.S. database ID | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |Western chimpanzee |
|1983 | |1983 | ||
| | | | ||
|0.24 | |0.24 | ||
− | | | + | |Present |
− | | | + | |Southeastern sector of the park (50 km²) |
− | | | + | |Line transects (Distance) |
|Anderson et al. 1983 | |Anderson et al. 1983 | ||
− | | | + | |Total survey effort: 42.7 km |
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |Western chimpanzee |
|2002 | |2002 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Present |
|Sapo National Park | |Sapo National Park | ||
− | | | + | |Line transects (Distance) |
|Waitkuwait 2003 | |Waitkuwait 2003 | ||
− | | | + | |Assessment of Fauna & Flora International's bio-monitoring programme |
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |Western chimpanzee |
|2007-2009 | |2007-2009 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 88: | Line 93: | ||
|0.27 | |0.27 | ||
|Sapo National Park, excluding south east area | |Sapo National Park, excluding south east area | ||
− | | | + | |Line transects (Distance) |
|Vogt 2011 | |Vogt 2011 | ||
|Fauna & Flora International bio-monitoring programme | |Fauna & Flora International bio-monitoring programme | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |Western chimpanzee |
|2009 | |2009 | ||
− | |1079 (713-1633) | + | |1079 (CI: 713-1633) |
|0.86 | |0.86 | ||
|4.05 | |4.05 | ||
|Sapo National Park, excluding mining areas | |Sapo National Park, excluding mining areas | ||
− | | | + | |Line transects (Distance) |
|N'Goran et al. 2010 | |N'Goran et al. 2010 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |Western chimpanzee |
|2016-2017 | |2016-2017 | ||
− | |1055 (595-1870) | + | |1055 (CI: 595-1870) |
− | |0.83 | + | |0.83 |
− | | | + | | |
|Sapo National Park, excluding south east area | |Sapo National Park, excluding south east area | ||
− | | | + | |Line transects (Distance) |
|Tweh et al. 2018 | |Tweh et al. 2018 | ||
− | | | + | |Total survey effort: 38.38 km |
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 120: | Line 125: | ||
Sapo National Park has been primarily threatened by illegal hunting and mining (Tweh et al. 2018; Greengrass 2015; N'Goran et al. 2010). An estimated 18,000 illegal miners were inhabiting the park in 2010, the majority of which was evicted by the government on the same year (Vogt 2011). A survey of two commercial hunting camps bordering the park revealed high hunting pressure in the area, and the majority of bushmeat harvested was destined to urban areas (Greengrass 2015). The carcasses documented during this survey included chimpanzees as well as other endangered and vulnerable species, such as the red colobus monkey, Diana monkey, and pygmy hippopotamus. Furthermore, the development of the road network around the park is expected to increase hunting pressure and facilitate the bushmeat trade (Greengrass 2015), as well as other illegal activities in the park. | Sapo National Park has been primarily threatened by illegal hunting and mining (Tweh et al. 2018; Greengrass 2015; N'Goran et al. 2010). An estimated 18,000 illegal miners were inhabiting the park in 2010, the majority of which was evicted by the government on the same year (Vogt 2011). A survey of two commercial hunting camps bordering the park revealed high hunting pressure in the area, and the majority of bushmeat harvested was destined to urban areas (Greengrass 2015). The carcasses documented during this survey included chimpanzees as well as other endangered and vulnerable species, such as the red colobus monkey, Diana monkey, and pygmy hippopotamus. Furthermore, the development of the road network around the park is expected to increase hunting pressure and facilitate the bushmeat trade (Greengrass 2015), as well as other illegal activities in the park. | ||
− | '''Table 3 | + | <div><ul> |
+ | <li style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: top;"> [[File: IllegalMining_Sapo_BTally.jpg | 200px | thumb| right | Illegal mining activity in Sapo © Ben Tally]] </li> | ||
+ | <li style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: top;"> [[File: MiningCamp_Sapo_BTally.jpg | 200px | thumb| right | Mining camp © Ben Tally]] </li> | ||
+ | <li style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: top;"> [[File: IllegalMining_BTally.jpg | 200px | thumb| right |Illegal mining © Ben Tally]] </li> | ||
+ | <li style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: top;"> [[File: Patrol_SMART.jpg | 200px | thumb| right |Illegal mining © Ben Tally]] </li> | ||
+ | </ul></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Table 3. Threats to great apes in Sapo National Park''' | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="threats-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="threats-table" | ||
!align="left"|Category <!-- Do not change threat categories --> | !align="left"|Category <!-- Do not change threat categories --> | ||
!Specific threats <!-- For specific threats, please use list of comma separated keywords from the list linked below --> | !Specific threats <!-- For specific threats, please use list of comma separated keywords from the list linked below --> | ||
!Threat level <!-- For threat level, please use keywords: unknown, low, high --> | !Threat level <!-- For threat level, please use keywords: unknown, low, high --> | ||
− | !Quantified severity | + | !Quantified severity |
!Description <!-- You can add descriptive information here --> | !Description <!-- You can add descriptive information here --> | ||
− | !Year of threat | + | !Year of threat |
|- | |- | ||
|1. Residential & commercial development | |1. Residential & commercial development | ||
− | |1.1 Housing & | + | |1.1 Housing & urban areas |
− | | | + | |High |
|18,000 settlers in 2010 | |18,000 settlers in 2010 | ||
− | | | + | |Illegal settlement of miners (Vogt 2011) |
|2010 | |2010 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|2. Agriculture & aquaculture | |2. Agriculture & aquaculture | ||
|2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | |2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | ||
− | | | + | |Present |
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Present as a result of illegal settlements; scale unknown (N’Goran et al. 2010) |
− | | | + | |Ongoing (2010) |
|- | |- | ||
|3. Energy production & mining | |3. Energy production & mining | ||
− | |3.2 | + | |3.2.3 Artisanal mining |
− | | | + | |High |
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Illicit gold mining which has decreased since 2010 (Tweh et al. 2018); artisanal mining is still present (Junket per. comm. 2019) |
− | | | + | |Ongoing ( 2019) |
|- | |- | ||
|4. Transportation & service corridors | |4. Transportation & service corridors | ||
|4.1 Roads & railroads | |4.1 Roads & railroads | ||
− | | | + | |Present |
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Development of the road network around the park facilitates illegal human activities in the park (Greengrass 2015) |
− | | | + | |Ongoing (2015) |
|- | |- | ||
|5. Biological resource use | |5. Biological resource use | ||
− | |5.1 Hunting & | + | |5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals |
− | | | + | |High |
− | | | + | |Hunting sign encounter rate: 1.7/km (Tweh et al. 2018) |
− | | | + | |Poaching represents a major threat to chimpanzees and other species in the park (Tweh et al. 2018, N’Goran et al. 2010, Greengrass 2015), and most of the bushmeat is destined to urban areas (Greengrass 2015) |
− | | | + | |Ongoing (2010, 2015, 2018) |
|- | |- | ||
− | |6. Human | + | |6. Human intrusion & disturbance |
|6.2 War, civil unrest & military exercises | |6.2 War, civil unrest & military exercises | ||
− | | | + | |High |
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Two civil wars since the establishment of the park disrupted conservation activities, and led to illegal occupation of the park, as well as poaching and extraction of natural resources (Greengrass 2015, Collen et al. 2011) |
|1989-1996, 1999-2003 | |1989-1996, 1999-2003 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|7. Natural system modifications | |7. Natural system modifications | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
+ | |Unknown | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 179: | Line 191: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | |8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
+ | |Unknown | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 186: | Line 198: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|9. Pollution | |9. Pollution | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
+ | |Unknown | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 193: | Line 205: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|10. Geological Events | |10. Geological Events | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
+ | |Absent | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 200: | Line 212: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 11. Climate change & severe weather | | 11. Climate change & severe weather | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
+ | |Unknown | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 207: | Line 219: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|12. Other options | |12. Other options | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
+ | |Absent | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 218: | Line 230: | ||
= Conservation activities = <!-- a text overview of conservation activities, followed by a table of key activities --> | = Conservation activities = <!-- a text overview of conservation activities, followed by a table of key activities --> | ||
− | The national park forms part of the Tai-Grebo-Sapo Forest Complex, which is a conservation priority in West Africa. Conservation efforts in Sapo National Park have mainly focused on law enforcement, conservation awareness, and bio-monitoring. The WCF has supported Community Watch Teams (CWT), which comprise members from surrounding communities, and regularly patrol and support FDA rangers (WCF 2019). CWTs have played an important role in the eviction of illegal miners from the national park (WCF 2019). In 2012, Fauna & Flora International established a long-term bio-monitoring program to follow the population trends for chimpanzees, pygmy hippopotamuses, elephants, as well as duikers, birds, reptiles, and amphibians (Tweh et al. 2018). Together with Liberia's Forestry Development Authority, permanent transects are surveyed twice a year as part of this long-term bio-monitoring program (Tweh et al. 2018). | + | The Forestry Development Authority of Liberia is responsible for the sustainable management of the forest sector and the protection of all natural resources. It runs the Sapo National Park in collaboration with Fauna & Flora International (FFI) and Wild Chimpanzee Foundation (WCF). Main activities at the national park level include anti-poaching, conservation education awareness, and bio-monitoring & scientific research. As of 2019, the main activities in the research area have been camera trappings (2019,2020, 2021) by FFI and FDA in the entire national park. eDNA (focusing on Pygmy hippopotamus) was conducted in 2022. The national park forms part of the Tai-Grebo-Sapo Forest Complex, which is a conservation priority in West Africa. Conservation efforts in Sapo National Park have mainly focused on law enforcement, conservation awareness, and bio-monitoring. The WCF has supported Community Watch Teams (CWT), which comprise members from surrounding communities, and regularly patrol and support FDA rangers (WCF 2019). CWTs have played an important role in the eviction of illegal miners from the national park (WCF 2019). In 2012, Fauna & Flora International established a long-term bio-monitoring program to follow the population trends for chimpanzees, pygmy hippopotamuses, elephants, as well as duikers, birds, reptiles, and amphibians (Tweh et al. 2018). Together with Liberia's Forestry Development Authority, permanent transects are surveyed twice a year as part of this long-term bio-monitoring program (Tweh et al. 2018). |
− | '''Table 4 | + | '''Table 4. Conservation activities in Sapo National Park''' |
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="conservation-actions-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="conservation-actions-table" | ||
!align="left"|Category <!-- Do not change threat categories --> | !align="left"|Category <!-- Do not change threat categories --> | ||
!Specific activity <!-- For specific threats, please use list of comma separated keywords from the list linked below --> | !Specific activity <!-- For specific threats, please use list of comma separated keywords from the list linked below --> | ||
!Description <!-- You can add descriptive information here --> | !Description <!-- You can add descriptive information here --> | ||
− | !Year of activity <!-- | + | !Year of activity <!-- You can add descriptive information here --> |
|- | |- | ||
|1. Residential & commercial development | |1. Residential & commercial development | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|2. Agriculture & aquaculture | |2. Agriculture & aquaculture | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|3. Energy production & mining | |3. Energy production & mining | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|4. Transportation & service corridors | |4. Transportation & service corridors | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|5. Biological resource use | |5. Biological resource use | ||
− | |5.6. Conduct regular anti-poaching patrols | + | |5.6. Conduct regular anti-poaching patrols |
|Community Watch Teams supported by the WCF regularly patrol the site (WCF 2019) | |Community Watch Teams supported by the WCF regularly patrol the site (WCF 2019) | ||
− | | | + | |Ongoing (2019) |
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
− | |5.11. Provide training to anti-poaching ranger patrols | + | |5.11. Provide training to anti-poaching ranger patrols |
|Members of the Community Watch Teams are trained in the use of equipment (GPS, compass, camera) and patrolling (WCF 2019) | |Members of the Community Watch Teams are trained in the use of equipment (GPS, compass, camera) and patrolling (WCF 2019) | ||
− | | | + | |Ongoing (2019) |
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
− | |5.15. Implement monitoring surveillance strategies | + | |5.15. Implement monitoring surveillance strategies (e.g. SMART) or use monitoring data to improve effectiveness of wildlife law enforcement patrols |
− | | | + | |Long-term bio-monitoring of chimpanzee population (Tweh et al. 2018) |
− | | | + | |Ongoing (2019) |
|- | |- | ||
− | |6. Human | + | |6. Human intrusion & disturbance |
|6.7. Resettle illegal human communities (i.e. in a protected area) to another location | |6.7. Resettle illegal human communities (i.e. in a protected area) to another location | ||
− | | | + | |Eviction of 18,000 illegal settlers in the park by the Liberia's government (Vogt 2011) |
|2010 | |2010 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|7. Natural system modifications | |7. Natural system modifications | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | |8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|9. Pollution | |9. Pollution | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 284: | Line 296: | ||
|10. Education & Awareness | |10. Education & Awareness | ||
|10.2. Involve local community in primate research and conservation management | |10.2. Involve local community in primate research and conservation management | ||
− | | | + | |As part of a long-term bio-monitoring program, staff of Liberia’s Forestry Development Authority and members of the local community are involved in the surveys (Tweh et al. 2018) |
− | | | + | |Ongoing (2018) |
|- | |- | ||
|11. Habitat Protection | |11. Habitat Protection | ||
|11.2. Legally protect primate habitat | |11.2. Legally protect primate habitat | ||
− | | | + | |The area is designated as National Park (N’Goran et al. 2010) |
− | | | + | |Ongoing (2010) |
|- | |- | ||
|12. Species Management | |12. Species Management | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|13. Livelihood; Economic & Other Incentives | |13. Livelihood; Economic & Other Incentives | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 305: | Line 317: | ||
[[Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)]] | [[Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)]] | ||
− | = | + | = Challenges = <!-- Overview of impediments to ape conservation --> |
− | '''Table 5 | + | The influx of local community dwellers inside the national park is hampering the SNP management to implement the protection of chimpanzees. Low manpower for conducting anti-poaching patrols in and outside the park has put chimpanzees under serious threat. |
+ | Very high illiteracy among the rangers thus making it difficult to collect data, process court procedures, and conduct conservation education awareness to local community people. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Table 5. Challenges reported for Sapo National Park''' | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="impediments-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="impediments-table" | ||
− | !align="left"| | + | !align="left"|Challenge <!-- Do not change categories --> |
!Source <!-- source for impediment mentioned --> | !Source <!-- source for impediment mentioned --> | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 320: | Line 336: | ||
|Lack of logistical means | |Lack of logistical means | ||
|Waitkuwait 2003 | |Waitkuwait 2003 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Conflict on land tenure | ||
+ | |Tally, B. pers. comm. 2022 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 329: | Line 348: | ||
===Documented behaviours=== <!-- List of any behaviours observed at the site, including citations --> | ===Documented behaviours=== <!-- List of any behaviours observed at the site, including citations --> | ||
− | '''Table 6 | + | '''Table 6. Great ape behaviors reported for Sapo National Park''' |
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="behaviors-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="behaviors-table" | ||
!align="left"|Behavior <!-- Do not change categories --> | !align="left"|Behavior <!-- Do not change categories --> | ||
Line 339: | Line 358: | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
= References = | = References = | ||
− | Tweh, C., Kouakou, C.Y., Chira, R., Freeman, B., Githaiga, J.M., Kerwillain, S., Molokwu-Odozi, M., Varney M. and Junker, J. 2018. Nest counts reveal a stable chimpanzee population in Sapo National Park, Liberia. Primate Conservation 2018 (32): 12 pp.<br> | + | Tweh, C., Kouakou, C.Y., Chira, R., Freeman, B., Githaiga, J.M., Kerwillain, S., Molokwu-Odozi, M., Varney M. and Junker, J. 2018. Nest counts reveal a stable chimpanzee population in Sapo National Park, Liberia. Primate Conservation 2018 (32): 12 pp. <br> |
− | N’Goran, K. P., Kouakou, C.Y. and Herbinger I. 2010. Report on the Population Survey and Monitoring of Chimpanzee in Sapo National Park, Liberia (June–December 2009). Report. Wild Chimpanzee Foundation, Abidjan, Côted’Ivoire.<br> | + | N’Goran, K. P., Kouakou, C.Y. and Herbinger I. 2010. Report on the Population Survey and Monitoring of Chimpanzee in Sapo National Park, Liberia (June–December 2009). Report. Wild Chimpanzee Foundation, Abidjan, Côted’Ivoire. <br> |
− | Anderson, R., Williamson, E.A., and Carter, J. 1983. Chimpanzees of Sapo Forest, Liberia: density, nests, tools and meat-eating. PRIMAaXS, 24(4): 594-601.<br> | + | Anderson, R., Williamson, E.A., and Carter, J. 1983. Chimpanzees of Sapo Forest, Liberia: density, nests, tools and meat-eating. PRIMAaXS, 24(4): 594-601. <br> |
− | Waitkuwait, W.E. 2003. Report on the First Year of Operation of a Community-based Bio-monitoring Programme in and around Sapo National Park, Sinoe County, Liberia. Report. Fauna and Flora International.<br> | + | Waitkuwait, W.E. 2003. Report on the First Year of Operation of a Community-based Bio-monitoring Programme in and around Sapo National Park, Sinoe County, Liberia. Report. Fauna and Flora International. <br> |
− | Vogt, M. 2011. Results of Sapo National Park Bio-Monitoring Programme 2007-2009. Report. Fauna & Flora International, Monrovia, Liberia.<br> | + | Vogt, M. 2011. Results of Sapo National Park Bio-Monitoring Programme 2007-2009. Report. Fauna & Flora International, Monrovia, Liberia. <br> |
− | Greengrass, E. 2015. Commercial hunting to supply urban markets threatens mammalian biodiversity in Sapo National Park. Oryx 50(3), 397–404.<br> | + | Greengrass, E. 2015. Commercial hunting to supply urban markets threatens mammalian biodiversity in Sapo National Park. Oryx 50(3), 397–404. <br> |
− | Collen, B., Howard, B., Konie, J., Daniel, O., and Rist, J. 2011. Field surveys for the endangered pygmy hippopotamus Choerpsis liberiensis in Sapo National Park, Liberia. Oryx, 45(1), 35–37.<br> | + | Collen, B., Howard, B., Konie, J., Daniel, O., and Rist, J. 2011. Field surveys for the endangered pygmy hippopotamus Choerpsis liberiensis in Sapo National Park, Liberia. Oryx, 45(1), 35–37. <br> |
− | Wild Chimpanzee Foundation. 2019. Activities of the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation for improved conservation of chimpanzees and their habitat in West Africa. Annual Report 2018. | + | Wild Chimpanzee Foundation. 2019. Activities of the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation for improved conservation of chimpanzees and their habitat in West Africa. Annual Report 2018. |
+ | Peal, A. L., & Kranz, K. R. (1990). Antelopes: GLobal Survey and Regional Action Plans, Part 3. West and | ||
+ | Central Africa. Gland, Switzerland: World Conservation Union. | ||
− | + | '''Page completed by:''' Ben Tally & A.P.E.S. Wiki Team '''Date:''' 23/01/23 <!-- If you don't want to add your name, you can add "A.P.E.S. Wiki team" --> | |
− | '''Page completed by:''' A.P.E.S. Wiki Team '''Date:''' | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> |
Latest revision as of 03:53, 22 July 2024
West Africa > Liberia > Sapo National Park
Summary[edit]
- Western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) are present in Sapo National Park.
- It has been estimated that 1,055 (CI: 595-1,870) individuals occur in the site.
- The chimpanzee population trend is stable.
- The park has a total size of 1,804 km².
- Key threats to chimpanzees are poaching and illegal mining.
- Conservation activities have focused on long-term bio-monitoring and law enforcement.
- Sapo National Park is Liberia's first protected area, established in 1983.
Site characteristics[edit]
Located in southeastern Liberia, Sapo National Park is Liberia's first protected area and represents one of the most intact forest ecosystems of the country (Tweh et al. 2018). The area of the park was extended from 1,304 km² to 1,804 km² in 2003 (Tweh et al. 2018). The park forms part of the Upper Guinean Forest ecosystem, and contains high levels of biodiversity (N'Goran et al. 2010). The park is a low elevation tropical humid rainforest. Elevation in the southeastern area is approximately 100m with gently rolling hills while in the north, the elevation is approximately 400m in the north with steep ridges (Peal & Kranz 1990). In addition to the western chimpanzee, other endangered and vulnerable species inhabit the site, including forest elephants (Loxodonta africana), pygmy hippopotamus (Hexaprotodon liberiensis), Jentink’s duiker (Cephalophus jentinki), red colobus (Piliocolobus badius), and Diana monkeys (Cercopithecus diana diana, N'Goran 2010).
Table 1. Basic site information for Sapo National Park
Area: | 1804 km² |
Coordinates | 5.378432, -8.496117 |
Designation: | National park |
Habitat types: | Subtropical/tropical moist lowland |
IUCN habitat categories Site designations
Ape status[edit]
A survey in 1982 (one year before the establishment of the park), confirmed the presence of chimpanzees in the Sapo forest (Anderson et al. 1983). Based on the estimates from two surveys, one in 2009 (N'Goran et al. 2010) and a second one in 2017 (Tweh et al. 2018), the chimpanzee population in the park has remained relatively stable, with an estimated abundance of approximately 1,055 individuals.
Table 2. Great ape population estimates in Sapo National Park
Species | Year | Abundance estimate (95% CI) | Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | Encounter rate | Area | Method | Source | Comments | A.P.E.S. database ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Western chimpanzee | 1983 | 0.24 | Present | Southeastern sector of the park (50 km²) | Line transects (Distance) | Anderson et al. 1983 | Total survey effort: 42.7 km | ||
Western chimpanzee | 2002 | Present | Sapo National Park | Line transects (Distance) | Waitkuwait 2003 | Assessment of Fauna & Flora International's bio-monitoring programme | |||
Western chimpanzee | 2007-2009 | 0.27 | Sapo National Park, excluding south east area | Line transects (Distance) | Vogt 2011 | Fauna & Flora International bio-monitoring programme | |||
Western chimpanzee | 2009 | 1079 (CI: 713-1633) | 0.86 | 4.05 | Sapo National Park, excluding mining areas | Line transects (Distance) | N'Goran et al. 2010 | ||
Western chimpanzee | 2016-2017 | 1055 (CI: 595-1870) | 0.83 | Sapo National Park, excluding south east area | Line transects (Distance) | Tweh et al. 2018 | Total survey effort: 38.38 km |
Threats[edit]
Sapo National Park has been primarily threatened by illegal hunting and mining (Tweh et al. 2018; Greengrass 2015; N'Goran et al. 2010). An estimated 18,000 illegal miners were inhabiting the park in 2010, the majority of which was evicted by the government on the same year (Vogt 2011). A survey of two commercial hunting camps bordering the park revealed high hunting pressure in the area, and the majority of bushmeat harvested was destined to urban areas (Greengrass 2015). The carcasses documented during this survey included chimpanzees as well as other endangered and vulnerable species, such as the red colobus monkey, Diana monkey, and pygmy hippopotamus. Furthermore, the development of the road network around the park is expected to increase hunting pressure and facilitate the bushmeat trade (Greengrass 2015), as well as other illegal activities in the park.
Table 3. Threats to great apes in Sapo National Park
Category | Specific threats | Threat level | Quantified severity | Description | Year of threat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Residential & commercial development | 1.1 Housing & urban areas | High | 18,000 settlers in 2010 | Illegal settlement of miners (Vogt 2011) | 2010 |
2. Agriculture & aquaculture | 2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | Present | Present as a result of illegal settlements; scale unknown (N’Goran et al. 2010) | Ongoing (2010) | |
3. Energy production & mining | 3.2.3 Artisanal mining | High | Illicit gold mining which has decreased since 2010 (Tweh et al. 2018); artisanal mining is still present (Junket per. comm. 2019) | Ongoing ( 2019) | |
4. Transportation & service corridors | 4.1 Roads & railroads | Present | Development of the road network around the park facilitates illegal human activities in the park (Greengrass 2015) | Ongoing (2015) | |
5. Biological resource use | 5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | High | Hunting sign encounter rate: 1.7/km (Tweh et al. 2018) | Poaching represents a major threat to chimpanzees and other species in the park (Tweh et al. 2018, N’Goran et al. 2010, Greengrass 2015), and most of the bushmeat is destined to urban areas (Greengrass 2015) | Ongoing (2010, 2015, 2018) |
6. Human intrusion & disturbance | 6.2 War, civil unrest & military exercises | High | Two civil wars since the establishment of the park disrupted conservation activities, and led to illegal occupation of the park, as well as poaching and extraction of natural resources (Greengrass 2015, Collen et al. 2011) | 1989-1996, 1999-2003 | |
7. Natural system modifications | Unknown | ||||
8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | Unknown | ||||
9. Pollution | Unknown | ||||
10. Geological Events | Absent | ||||
11. Climate change & severe weather | Unknown | ||||
12. Other options | Absent |
Conservation activities[edit]
The Forestry Development Authority of Liberia is responsible for the sustainable management of the forest sector and the protection of all natural resources. It runs the Sapo National Park in collaboration with Fauna & Flora International (FFI) and Wild Chimpanzee Foundation (WCF). Main activities at the national park level include anti-poaching, conservation education awareness, and bio-monitoring & scientific research. As of 2019, the main activities in the research area have been camera trappings (2019,2020, 2021) by FFI and FDA in the entire national park. eDNA (focusing on Pygmy hippopotamus) was conducted in 2022. The national park forms part of the Tai-Grebo-Sapo Forest Complex, which is a conservation priority in West Africa. Conservation efforts in Sapo National Park have mainly focused on law enforcement, conservation awareness, and bio-monitoring. The WCF has supported Community Watch Teams (CWT), which comprise members from surrounding communities, and regularly patrol and support FDA rangers (WCF 2019). CWTs have played an important role in the eviction of illegal miners from the national park (WCF 2019). In 2012, Fauna & Flora International established a long-term bio-monitoring program to follow the population trends for chimpanzees, pygmy hippopotamuses, elephants, as well as duikers, birds, reptiles, and amphibians (Tweh et al. 2018). Together with Liberia's Forestry Development Authority, permanent transects are surveyed twice a year as part of this long-term bio-monitoring program (Tweh et al. 2018).
Table 4. Conservation activities in Sapo National Park
Category | Specific activity | Description | Year of activity |
---|---|---|---|
1. Residential & commercial development | Not reported | ||
2. Agriculture & aquaculture | Not reported | ||
3. Energy production & mining | Not reported | ||
4. Transportation & service corridors | Not reported | ||
5. Biological resource use | 5.6. Conduct regular anti-poaching patrols | Community Watch Teams supported by the WCF regularly patrol the site (WCF 2019) | Ongoing (2019) |
5.11. Provide training to anti-poaching ranger patrols | Members of the Community Watch Teams are trained in the use of equipment (GPS, compass, camera) and patrolling (WCF 2019) | Ongoing (2019) | |
5.15. Implement monitoring surveillance strategies (e.g. SMART) or use monitoring data to improve effectiveness of wildlife law enforcement patrols | Long-term bio-monitoring of chimpanzee population (Tweh et al. 2018) | Ongoing (2019) | |
6. Human intrusion & disturbance | 6.7. Resettle illegal human communities (i.e. in a protected area) to another location | Eviction of 18,000 illegal settlers in the park by the Liberia's government (Vogt 2011) | 2010 |
7. Natural system modifications | Not reported | ||
8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | Not reported | ||
9. Pollution | Not reported | ||
10. Education & Awareness | 10.2. Involve local community in primate research and conservation management | As part of a long-term bio-monitoring program, staff of Liberia’s Forestry Development Authority and members of the local community are involved in the surveys (Tweh et al. 2018) | Ongoing (2018) |
11. Habitat Protection | 11.2. Legally protect primate habitat | The area is designated as National Park (N’Goran et al. 2010) | Ongoing (2010) |
12. Species Management | Not reported | ||
13. Livelihood; Economic & Other Incentives | Not reported |
Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)
Challenges[edit]
The influx of local community dwellers inside the national park is hampering the SNP management to implement the protection of chimpanzees. Low manpower for conducting anti-poaching patrols in and outside the park has put chimpanzees under serious threat. Very high illiteracy among the rangers thus making it difficult to collect data, process court procedures, and conduct conservation education awareness to local community people.
Table 5. Challenges reported for Sapo National Park
Challenge | Source |
---|---|
Lack of law enforcement | Greengrass 2015, N'Goran et al. 2010 |
Lack of technical means | Tweh et al. 2018 |
Lack of logistical means | Waitkuwait 2003 |
Conflict on land tenure | Tally, B. pers. comm. 2022 |
Research activities[edit]
Several surveys have been done in the park to monitor the chimpanzee population (e.g., N'Goran et al. 2010, Tweh et al. 2018), assess the impacts of conservation interventions (Tweh et al. 2018), investigate the behavior and ecology of chimpanzees in the park (Anderson et al. 1983), and investigate the impact of hunting pressure in the area (Greengrass 2015).
Documented behaviours[edit]
Table 6. Great ape behaviors reported for Sapo National Park
Behavior | Source |
---|---|
Nut cracking | Anderson et al. 1983 |
References[edit]
Tweh, C., Kouakou, C.Y., Chira, R., Freeman, B., Githaiga, J.M., Kerwillain, S., Molokwu-Odozi, M., Varney M. and Junker, J. 2018. Nest counts reveal a stable chimpanzee population in Sapo National Park, Liberia. Primate Conservation 2018 (32): 12 pp.
N’Goran, K. P., Kouakou, C.Y. and Herbinger I. 2010. Report on the Population Survey and Monitoring of Chimpanzee in Sapo National Park, Liberia (June–December 2009). Report. Wild Chimpanzee Foundation, Abidjan, Côted’Ivoire.
Anderson, R., Williamson, E.A., and Carter, J. 1983. Chimpanzees of Sapo Forest, Liberia: density, nests, tools and meat-eating. PRIMAaXS, 24(4): 594-601.
Waitkuwait, W.E. 2003. Report on the First Year of Operation of a Community-based Bio-monitoring Programme in and around Sapo National Park, Sinoe County, Liberia. Report. Fauna and Flora International.
Vogt, M. 2011. Results of Sapo National Park Bio-Monitoring Programme 2007-2009. Report. Fauna & Flora International, Monrovia, Liberia.
Greengrass, E. 2015. Commercial hunting to supply urban markets threatens mammalian biodiversity in Sapo National Park. Oryx 50(3), 397–404.
Collen, B., Howard, B., Konie, J., Daniel, O., and Rist, J. 2011. Field surveys for the endangered pygmy hippopotamus Choerpsis liberiensis in Sapo National Park, Liberia. Oryx, 45(1), 35–37.
Wild Chimpanzee Foundation. 2019. Activities of the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation for improved conservation of chimpanzees and their habitat in West Africa. Annual Report 2018.
Peal, A. L., & Kranz, K. R. (1990). Antelopes: GLobal Survey and Regional Action Plans, Part 3. West and
Central Africa. Gland, Switzerland: World Conservation Union.
Page completed by: Ben Tally & A.P.E.S. Wiki Team Date: 23/01/23