Difference between revisions of "Lac Tumba landscape"
(Created page with "<!-- INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING SITE INFORMATION - Please consider whether any information you would like to add is sensitive and could be misused to harm apes. Please do no...") |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | <!-- INSTRUCTIONS FOR | + | <!-- INSTRUCTIONS FOR UPLOADING SITE INFORMATION |
− | + | - Wiki pages contain information in paragraphs, tables, lists, and images. | |
− | - | + | - Text and images are not restricted, and their formats can be chosen as desired. |
− | + | - Tables and lists are extracted as data, so the following restrictions apply to them: | |
− | + | 1) Table structure cannot be changed. | |
− | - Text | + | 2) List format should not change, i.e. they are comma separated lists, not bullet points or numbered lists. |
− | - Tables and | + | 3) To make information comparable across wiki pages, keywords must be taken from the list of permitted words, or added to the list of permitted keywords. This is why we use official lists, e.g., IUCN classification lists, in our tables. |
− | 1) Table structure cannot be changed | ||
− | 2) | ||
− | 3) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
--> | --> | ||
+ | [[Central Africa]] > [[Democratic Republic of the Congo]] > [[Lac Tumba landscape]] | ||
− | + | = Summary = <!-- An overview of the site, with one sentence for each section. May include a site map --> | |
− | + | * Bonobos (''Pan paniscus'') and eastern chimpanzees (''Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii'') are present in the Lac Tumba landscape. | |
− | = Summary = | + | * The population sizes are unknown. |
+ | * The great ape population trend is unknown. | ||
+ | * The site has a total size of 78,972 km². | ||
+ | * Key threats to bonobos are poaching, habitat loss, and diseases. | ||
+ | * Conservation activities are not documented. | ||
+ | * The site holds the world’s largest swamp forest, and the world’s second largest wetland area. | ||
− | + | = Site characteristics = <!-- A paragraph summary of physical and geographic aspects of the site, and a table of key information --> | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | The Lac Tumba (or Lake Tumba) landscape is situated in western Democratic Republic of Congo, and extends into neighbouring Republic of Congo, forming the Lac Tumba-Lac Tele transboundary landscape. The landscape is made up mainly of marshes, seasonally flooded forests and meadows. It is home to the largest Ramsar freshwater wetland of international importance. The forest of Lac Tumba is the world’s largest swamp forest, and the world’s second largest wetland area (WWF n.d.). About 60% of the Lac Tumba landscape is inundated and seasonally flooded forest (Inogwabini et al. 2007). The landscape is home to a wide variety of large mammals, including bonobos, chimpanzees, Angolan pied colobus, Allen's swamp monkeys, black mangabeys, red colobus, red-tailed monkeys, forest elephants, buffalos and leopards (Inogwabini et al. 2007). In addition, the swamps have a rich diversity of fish and attract freshwater-dependent species such as sitatunga, water chevrotain, slender-snout crocodiles, Nile crocodile, and hippopotamus (Inogwabini et al. 2007). | ||
− | + | '''Table 1. Basic site information for Lac Tumba landscape''' | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | '''Table 1 | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="basic-information" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="basic-information" | ||
− | | Area | + | | Area <!-- Please include units: km2/ha e.g 200ha --> |
− | | | + | |78,972 km² |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Coordinates | + | |Coordinates |
− | | | + | | -1.597554, 17.117188 |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Designation | + | |Designation |
− | | | + | |Protected Landscape |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Habitat types | + | |Habitat types <!-- List IUCN Habitat Classification 3.0 categories present (without number), see link below --> |
− | | | + | |Subtropical/tropical swamp forest, subtropical/tropical moist lowland forest, savanna |
|} | |} | ||
− | [ | + | [https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/habitat-classification-scheme IUCN habitat categories] [[Site designations]] |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | = Ape status = <!--An overview of ape population status (population sizes, trends, etc.), followed by a table of specific surveys and results --> | ||
+ | Bonobo groups were found in five areas in a 2005 survey: (1) Bolombo-Losombo, (2) Mbala-Donkese, (3) Ngombe-Botuali, (4) Botuali-Ilombe, and (5) Mompulenge–Mbanzi-Malebo–Nguomi (Inogwabini et al. 2007). There were two sub-groups in the latter area, separated by 50 km of unbroken gallery forest, Mopulenge-Mbanzi and Malebo-Nguomi. One group of chimpanzees was found in the area between Bosobele and Lubengo (Inogwabini et al. 2007). | ||
− | + | '''Table 2. Ape population estimates in Lac Tumba landscape''' | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | '''Table 2 | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="population-estimate-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="population-estimate-table" | ||
! Species | ! Species | ||
! Year | ! Year | ||
− | ! Abundance estimate (95% | + | ! Abundance estimate (95% CI) |
− | ! Density estimate ( | + | ! Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) |
! Encounter rate (nests/km) | ! Encounter rate (nests/km) | ||
! Area | ! Area | ||
Line 72: | Line 55: | ||
! A.P.E.S. database ID | ! A.P.E.S. database ID | ||
|- | |- | ||
+ | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
+ | |2005 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |0.057 | ||
+ | |Bolombo-Losombo (552 sq. km) | ||
+ | |Reconnaissance and line transect methods | ||
+ | |Inogwabini et al. 2007 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
+ | |2005 | ||
+ | |17 (15-19) | ||
+ | |0.27 (0.24-0.29) | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |Mbala-Donkese (160 sq. km) | ||
+ | |Reconnaissance and line transect methods | ||
+ | |Inogwabini et al. 2007 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
+ | |2005 | ||
+ | |198 (176-212) | ||
+ | |0.27 (0.24-0.29) | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |Ngombe-Botuali (1,829 sq. km) | ||
+ | |Reconnaissance and line transect methods | ||
+ | |Inogwabini et al. 2007 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
+ | |2005 | ||
+ | |103 (92-111) | ||
+ | |0.27 (0.24-0.29) | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |Botuali-Ilombe (955 sq. km) | ||
+ | |Reconnaissance and line transect methods | ||
+ | |Inogwabini et al. 2007 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
+ | |2005 | ||
+ | |2,297 (1,880-3,550) | ||
+ | |2.2 (1.8-3.4) | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |Malebo-Nguomi (1,993 sq. km) | ||
+ | |Reconnaissance and line transect methods | ||
+ | |Inogwabini et al. 2007 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
+ | |2005 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |1.2 | ||
+ | |Mopulenge-Mbanzi (1,380,390 sq. km) | ||
+ | |Reconnaissance and line transect methods | ||
+ | |Inogwabini et al. 2007 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |''Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii'' | ||
+ | |2005 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |0.019 | ||
+ | |Bosobele-Lubengo (4,047 sq. km) | ||
+ | |Reconnaissance and line transect methods | ||
+ | |Inogwabini et al. 2007 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 86: | Line 135: | ||
= Threats = <!-- a text overview of threats, followed by a table of key threats --> | = Threats = <!-- a text overview of threats, followed by a table of key threats --> | ||
+ | Poaching, habitat loss, and diseases are the main direct threats to bonobos in Lac Tumba (IUCN & ICCN 2012). Although logging has been considered moderately severe, the situation is considered reversible if sufficient efforts are made, such as closing of logging roads and rehabilitation of the natural vegetation (IUCN & ICCN 2012). Unmonitored fishing and bushmeat hunting are common at the site (Inogwabini et al. 2007). The Bateke people inhabiting the Malebo area believe that bonobos are their ancestors, and therefore a traditional taboo prevents them from hunting bonobos (Inogwabini et al. 2007). | ||
− | + | '''Table 3. Threats to apes in Lac Tumba landscape''' | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | '''Table 3 | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="threats-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="threats-table" | ||
− | !align="left"|Category | + | !align="left"|Category <!-- PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE THE THREAT CATEGORIES --> |
− | !Specific threats | + | !Specific threats <!-- For specific threats, please use list of comma separated keywords from the IUCN list linked below --> |
− | !Threat level | + | !Threat level <!-- For threat level, please use keywords: low, medium, high, present, absent, unknown--> |
− | !Quantified severity <!-- e.g., encounter | + | !Quantified severity <!-- Enter any available quantification of the threat, e.g., the proportion of the area affected by the threat, hunting sign encounter rates--> |
− | !Description | + | !Description <!-- Add descriptive information --> |
− | !Year of threat | + | !Year of threat <!-- Enter specific year(s), “ongoing”, or “unknown”. If the threat is ongoing, please add the year of reference in parentheses --> |
|- | |- | ||
|1. Residential & commercial development | |1. Residential & commercial development | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 107: | Line 154: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|2. Agriculture & aquaculture | |2. Agriculture & aquaculture | ||
+ | |2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | ||
+ | |High | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unplanned and unsustainable subsistence agricultural practices (Inogwabini et al. 2007). |
− | | | + | |Ongoing (2007) |
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
|3. Energy production & mining | |3. Energy production & mining | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 121: | Line 168: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|4. Transportation & service corridors | |4. Transportation & service corridors | ||
+ | |4.1 Roads & railroads | ||
+ | |Low | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Development of communications infrastructure (roads, railways) (IUCN & ICCN 2012). |
− | | | + | |Ongoing (2012) |
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
|5. Biological resource use | |5. Biological resource use | ||
+ | |5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | ||
+ | |High | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |Poaching is facilitated by increasing availability of weapons and ammunition and the location of the area at the junction of major river routes (Inogwabini et al. 2007, IUCN & ICCN 2012). | ||
+ | |Ongoing (2012) | ||
+ | |- | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | ||
+ | |High | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Legal and illegal industrial logging. Easy river access is used for transportation of timber to Kinshasa (IUCN & ICCN 2012). Logging for the wenge Mellitia laurenti (Inogwabini et al. 2007). |
− | | | + | |Ongoing (2012) |
|- | |- | ||
− | |6. Human | + | |6. Human intrusion & disturbance |
− | |||
| | | | ||
+ | |Unknown | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 143: | Line 197: | ||
|7. Natural system modifications | |7. Natural system modifications | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 149: | Line 203: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | |8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | ||
+ | |8.4 Problematic species/diseases of unknown origin | ||
+ | |Present, but threat severity unknown | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Threat of disease (IUCN & ICCN 2012). |
− | | | + | |Ongoing (2012) |
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
|9. Pollution | |9. Pollution | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 164: | Line 218: | ||
|10. Geological Events | |10. Geological Events | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Absent |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |11. Climate change & severe weather | + | | 11. Climate change & severe weather |
− | |||
| | | | ||
+ | |Unknown | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 178: | Line 232: | ||
|12. Other options | |12. Other options | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Absent |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 186: | Line 240: | ||
[https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/threat-classification-scheme IUCN Threats list] | [https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/threat-classification-scheme IUCN Threats list] | ||
+ | = Conservation activities = <!-- A summary of the conservation activities, followed by a table of key activities --> | ||
+ | The landscape is a priority conservation landscape funded by the Central African Regional Programme for the Environment of the US Agency for International Development through the International Congo Basin Forest Partnership. The site was selected as a priority conservation site in 2000 (Inogwabini et al. 2007). | ||
− | + | '''Table 4. Conservation activities in Lac Tumba landscape''' | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | '''Table 4 | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="conservation-actions-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="conservation-actions-table" | ||
− | !align="left"|Category | + | !align="left"|Category <!-- PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE THE CATEGORIES --> |
− | !Specific activity | + | !Specific activity <!-- For specific threats, please use list from the list linked below, OR enter “Not reported” --> |
− | !Description | + | !Description <!-- Add descriptive information --> |
− | !Year of activity | + | !Year of activity <!-- Add descriptive information --> |
|- | |- | ||
|1. Residential & commercial development | |1. Residential & commercial development | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|2. Agriculture & aquaculture | |2. Agriculture & aquaculture | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|3. Energy production & mining | |3. Energy production & mining | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|4. Transportation & service corridors | |4. Transportation & service corridors | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|5. Biological resource use | |5. Biological resource use | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |6. Human | + | |6. Human intrusion & disturbance |
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|7. Natural system modifications | |7. Natural system modifications | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | |8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|9. Pollution | |9. Pollution | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|10. Education & Awareness | |10. Education & Awareness | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|11. Habitat Protection | |11. Habitat Protection | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|12. Species Management | |12. Species Management | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|13. Livelihood; Economic & Other Incentives | |13. Livelihood; Economic & Other Incentives | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 270: | Line 319: | ||
[[Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)]] | [[Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)]] | ||
+ | = Challenges = <!-- Overview of challenges in ape conservation --> | ||
− | + | '''Table 5. Challenges reported for Lac Tumba landscape''' | |
− | + | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="challenges-table" | |
− | + | !align="left"|Challenge <!-- Do not change categories --> | |
− | + | !Source <!-- Source for challenge mentioned --> | |
− | + | |- | |
− | + | |Lack of law enforcement | |
− | '''Table 5 | + | |IUCN & ICCN 2012 |
− | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class=" | + | |- |
− | !align="left"| | + | |Lack of government support |
− | !Source | + | |IUCN & ICCN 2012 |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Lack of understanding of conservation issues | ||
+ | |IUCN & ICCN 2012 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |Insufficient subsistence alternatives |
− | | | + | |IUCN & ICCN 2012 |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
= Research activities = <!-- Overview of research activities --> | = Research activities = <!-- Overview of research activities --> | ||
− | + | [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2028.2012.01323.x Preliminary bonobo and chimpanzee nesting by habitat type in the northern Lac Tumba Landscape, Democratic Republic of Congo]<br> | |
− | + | [https://benthamopen.com/ABSTRACT/TOCONSBJ-3-14 Bonobo Food Items, Food Availability and Bonobo Distribution in the Lake Tumba Swampy Forests, Democratic Republic of Congo] | |
− | |||
===Documented behaviours=== <!-- List of any behaviours observed at the site, including citations --> | ===Documented behaviours=== <!-- List of any behaviours observed at the site, including citations --> | ||
− | '''Table 6 | + | '''Table 6. Ape behaviors reported for Lac Tumba landscape''' |
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="behaviors-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="behaviors-table" | ||
− | !align="left"|Behavior | + | !align="left"|Behavior |
− | !Source | + | !Source |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | =External links= | ||
+ | [https://www.wwfdrc.org/en/our_work/landscapes/lac_tumba_landscape/ WWF Lac Tumba Landscape] | ||
===Relevant datasets=== | ===Relevant datasets=== | ||
[http://apesportal.eva.mpg.de/database/archiveMap A.P.E.S Portal] | [http://apesportal.eva.mpg.de/database/archiveMap A.P.E.S Portal] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
= References = | = References = | ||
− | + | WWF (n.d.). Lac Tumba. Online: https://www.wwfdrc.org/en/our_work/landscapes/lac_tumba_landscape/ <br> | |
+ | Inogwabini, B. I., Matungila, B., Mbende, L., Abokome, M., & wa Tshimanga, T. (2007). Great apes in the Lake Tumba landscape, Democratic Republic of Congo: newly described populations. Oryx, 41(4), 532-538. <br> | ||
+ | IUCN & ICCN (2012). Bonobo (Pan paniscus): Conservation Strategy 2012–2022. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Primate <br> | ||
+ | Spécialist Group & Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature. 65 pp <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | '''Page completed by:''' | + | '''Page completed by: '''A.P.E.S. Wiki team''' Date:''' 29/11/2021 <!-- If you don't want to add your name, you can add "A.P.E.S. Wiki team" --> |
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Latest revision as of 04:17, 23 February 2022
Central Africa > Democratic Republic of the Congo > Lac Tumba landscape
Summary
- Bonobos (Pan paniscus) and eastern chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) are present in the Lac Tumba landscape.
- The population sizes are unknown.
- The great ape population trend is unknown.
- The site has a total size of 78,972 km².
- Key threats to bonobos are poaching, habitat loss, and diseases.
- Conservation activities are not documented.
- The site holds the world’s largest swamp forest, and the world’s second largest wetland area.
Site characteristics
The Lac Tumba (or Lake Tumba) landscape is situated in western Democratic Republic of Congo, and extends into neighbouring Republic of Congo, forming the Lac Tumba-Lac Tele transboundary landscape. The landscape is made up mainly of marshes, seasonally flooded forests and meadows. It is home to the largest Ramsar freshwater wetland of international importance. The forest of Lac Tumba is the world’s largest swamp forest, and the world’s second largest wetland area (WWF n.d.). About 60% of the Lac Tumba landscape is inundated and seasonally flooded forest (Inogwabini et al. 2007). The landscape is home to a wide variety of large mammals, including bonobos, chimpanzees, Angolan pied colobus, Allen's swamp monkeys, black mangabeys, red colobus, red-tailed monkeys, forest elephants, buffalos and leopards (Inogwabini et al. 2007). In addition, the swamps have a rich diversity of fish and attract freshwater-dependent species such as sitatunga, water chevrotain, slender-snout crocodiles, Nile crocodile, and hippopotamus (Inogwabini et al. 2007).
Table 1. Basic site information for Lac Tumba landscape
Area | 78,972 km² |
Coordinates | -1.597554, 17.117188 |
Designation | Protected Landscape |
Habitat types | Subtropical/tropical swamp forest, subtropical/tropical moist lowland forest, savanna |
IUCN habitat categories Site designations
Ape status
Bonobo groups were found in five areas in a 2005 survey: (1) Bolombo-Losombo, (2) Mbala-Donkese, (3) Ngombe-Botuali, (4) Botuali-Ilombe, and (5) Mompulenge–Mbanzi-Malebo–Nguomi (Inogwabini et al. 2007). There were two sub-groups in the latter area, separated by 50 km of unbroken gallery forest, Mopulenge-Mbanzi and Malebo-Nguomi. One group of chimpanzees was found in the area between Bosobele and Lubengo (Inogwabini et al. 2007).
Table 2. Ape population estimates in Lac Tumba landscape
Species | Year | Abundance estimate (95% CI) | Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | Encounter rate (nests/km) | Area | Method | Source | Comments | A.P.E.S. database ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pan paniscus | 2005 | 0.057 | Bolombo-Losombo (552 sq. km) | Reconnaissance and line transect methods | Inogwabini et al. 2007 | ||||
Pan paniscus | 2005 | 17 (15-19) | 0.27 (0.24-0.29) | Mbala-Donkese (160 sq. km) | Reconnaissance and line transect methods | Inogwabini et al. 2007 | |||
Pan paniscus | 2005 | 198 (176-212) | 0.27 (0.24-0.29) | Ngombe-Botuali (1,829 sq. km) | Reconnaissance and line transect methods | Inogwabini et al. 2007 | |||
Pan paniscus | 2005 | 103 (92-111) | 0.27 (0.24-0.29) | Botuali-Ilombe (955 sq. km) | Reconnaissance and line transect methods | Inogwabini et al. 2007 | |||
Pan paniscus | 2005 | 2,297 (1,880-3,550) | 2.2 (1.8-3.4) | Malebo-Nguomi (1,993 sq. km) | Reconnaissance and line transect methods | Inogwabini et al. 2007 | |||
Pan paniscus | 2005 | 1.2 | Mopulenge-Mbanzi (1,380,390 sq. km) | Reconnaissance and line transect methods | Inogwabini et al. 2007 | ||||
Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii | 2005 | 0.019 | Bosobele-Lubengo (4,047 sq. km) | Reconnaissance and line transect methods | Inogwabini et al. 2007 |
Threats
Poaching, habitat loss, and diseases are the main direct threats to bonobos in Lac Tumba (IUCN & ICCN 2012). Although logging has been considered moderately severe, the situation is considered reversible if sufficient efforts are made, such as closing of logging roads and rehabilitation of the natural vegetation (IUCN & ICCN 2012). Unmonitored fishing and bushmeat hunting are common at the site (Inogwabini et al. 2007). The Bateke people inhabiting the Malebo area believe that bonobos are their ancestors, and therefore a traditional taboo prevents them from hunting bonobos (Inogwabini et al. 2007).
Table 3. Threats to apes in Lac Tumba landscape
Category | Specific threats | Threat level | Quantified severity | Description | Year of threat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Residential & commercial development | Unknown | ||||
2. Agriculture & aquaculture | 2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | High | Unplanned and unsustainable subsistence agricultural practices (Inogwabini et al. 2007). | Ongoing (2007) | |
3. Energy production & mining | Unknown | ||||
4. Transportation & service corridors | 4.1 Roads & railroads | Low | Development of communications infrastructure (roads, railways) (IUCN & ICCN 2012). | Ongoing (2012) | |
5. Biological resource use | 5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | High | Poaching is facilitated by increasing availability of weapons and ammunition and the location of the area at the junction of major river routes (Inogwabini et al. 2007, IUCN & ICCN 2012). | Ongoing (2012) | |
5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | High | Legal and illegal industrial logging. Easy river access is used for transportation of timber to Kinshasa (IUCN & ICCN 2012). Logging for the wenge Mellitia laurenti (Inogwabini et al. 2007). | Ongoing (2012) | ||
6. Human intrusion & disturbance | Unknown | ||||
7. Natural system modifications | Unknown | ||||
8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | 8.4 Problematic species/diseases of unknown origin | Present, but threat severity unknown | Threat of disease (IUCN & ICCN 2012). | Ongoing (2012) | |
9. Pollution | Unknown | ||||
10. Geological Events | Absent | ||||
11. Climate change & severe weather | Unknown | ||||
12. Other options | Absent |
Conservation activities
The landscape is a priority conservation landscape funded by the Central African Regional Programme for the Environment of the US Agency for International Development through the International Congo Basin Forest Partnership. The site was selected as a priority conservation site in 2000 (Inogwabini et al. 2007).
Table 4. Conservation activities in Lac Tumba landscape
Category | Specific activity | Description | Year of activity |
---|---|---|---|
1. Residential & commercial development | Not reported | ||
2. Agriculture & aquaculture | Not reported | ||
3. Energy production & mining | Not reported | ||
4. Transportation & service corridors | Not reported | ||
5. Biological resource use | Not reported | ||
6. Human intrusion & disturbance | Not reported | ||
7. Natural system modifications | Not reported | ||
8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | Not reported | ||
9. Pollution | Not reported | ||
10. Education & Awareness | Not reported | ||
11. Habitat Protection | Not reported | ||
12. Species Management | Not reported | ||
13. Livelihood; Economic & Other Incentives | Not reported |
Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)
Challenges
Table 5. Challenges reported for Lac Tumba landscape
Challenge | Source |
---|---|
Lack of law enforcement | IUCN & ICCN 2012 |
Lack of government support | IUCN & ICCN 2012 |
Lack of understanding of conservation issues | IUCN & ICCN 2012 |
Insufficient subsistence alternatives | IUCN & ICCN 2012 |
Research activities
Preliminary bonobo and chimpanzee nesting by habitat type in the northern Lac Tumba Landscape, Democratic Republic of Congo
Bonobo Food Items, Food Availability and Bonobo Distribution in the Lake Tumba Swampy Forests, Democratic Republic of Congo
Documented behaviours
Table 6. Ape behaviors reported for Lac Tumba landscape
Behavior | Source |
---|---|
Not reported |
External links
Relevant datasets
References
WWF (n.d.). Lac Tumba. Online: https://www.wwfdrc.org/en/our_work/landscapes/lac_tumba_landscape/
Inogwabini, B. I., Matungila, B., Mbende, L., Abokome, M., & wa Tshimanga, T. (2007). Great apes in the Lake Tumba landscape, Democratic Republic of Congo: newly described populations. Oryx, 41(4), 532-538.
IUCN & ICCN (2012). Bonobo (Pan paniscus): Conservation Strategy 2012–2022. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Primate
Spécialist Group & Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature. 65 pp
Page completed by: A.P.E.S. Wiki team Date: 29/11/2021