Difference between revisions of "Ulu Segama-Malua"
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
[[Asia]] > [[Malaysia]] > [[Ulu Segama-Malua]] | [[Asia]] > [[Malaysia]] > [[Ulu Segama-Malua]] | ||
− | = Summary = < | + | '''[https://wiki-iucnapesportal-org.translate.goog/index.php/Ulu_Segama-Malua?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp Français]''' | '''[https://wiki-iucnapesportal-org.translate.goog/index.php/Ulu_Segama-Malua?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=pt&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp Português]''' | '''[https://wiki-iucnapesportal-org.translate.goog/index.php/Ulu_Segama-Malua?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=es&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp Español]''' | '''[https://wiki-iucnapesportal-org.translate.goog/index.php/Ulu_Segama-Malua?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=id&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp Bahasa Indonesia]''' | '''[https://wiki-iucnapesportal-org.translate.goog/index.php/Ulu_Segama-Malua?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=ms&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp Melayu]''' |
+ | |||
+ | __TOC__ | ||
+ | = Summary = | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div style="float: right">{{#display_map: height=190px | width=300px | scrollzoom=off | zoom=5 | layers= OpenStreetMap, OpenTopoMap|4.956727, 117.878134~[[Ulu Segama-Malua]]~'Pongo pygmaeus morio''}}</div> | ||
* Northeast Bornean orangutans (''Pongo pygmaeus morio'') are present in the Ulu Segama-Malua landscape. | * Northeast Bornean orangutans (''Pongo pygmaeus morio'') are present in the Ulu Segama-Malua landscape. | ||
* It has been estimated that 2,580 (CI: 1,295-5,866) individuals occur in the site. | * It has been estimated that 2,580 (CI: 1,295-5,866) individuals occur in the site. | ||
Line 17: | Line 14: | ||
* Conservation activities have focused on habitat restoration. | * Conservation activities have focused on habitat restoration. | ||
− | = Site characteristics = | + | |
+ | = Site characteristics = | ||
The Ulu Segama-Malua (USM) landscape is located in the Malaysian state of Sabah between 116°28′E and 4°14′N and comprises approximately 240,000 hectares of lowland forest (WWF 2020, Ancrenaz et al. 2010). The site sustains one of the largest orangutan populations in Sabah (WWF 2020). To the north of USM, Bukit Piton Forest Reserve (12,000 ha) is found, which is an area of high conservation value (WWF 2020). The USM landscape consists of a variably steep terrain, with many hills and ridges, although Malua's topography is predominantly flat and low (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). | The Ulu Segama-Malua (USM) landscape is located in the Malaysian state of Sabah between 116°28′E and 4°14′N and comprises approximately 240,000 hectares of lowland forest (WWF 2020, Ancrenaz et al. 2010). The site sustains one of the largest orangutan populations in Sabah (WWF 2020). To the north of USM, Bukit Piton Forest Reserve (12,000 ha) is found, which is an area of high conservation value (WWF 2020). The USM landscape consists of a variably steep terrain, with many hills and ridges, although Malua's topography is predominantly flat and low (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). | ||
'''Table 1. Basic site information for Ulu Segama-Malua''' | '''Table 1. Basic site information for Ulu Segama-Malua''' | ||
− | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class=" | + | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Site_characteristics-table" |
− | | Area | + | |Species |
+ | |'Pongo pygmaeus morio'' | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Area | ||
|2,400 km² | |2,400 km² | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Coordinates | |Coordinates | ||
− | |4.956727, 117.878134 | + | |Lat: 4.956727 , Lon: 117.878134 |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Type of site | ||
+ | |Non-protected area | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |Habitat types |
− | | | + | |Subtropical/tropical moist lowland forest, Subtropical/tropical heavily degraded former forest |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |Type of governance |
− | | | + | | |
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
− | = Ape status = | + | [https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/habitat-classification-scheme IUCN habitat categories] [[Site designations]] |
+ | = Ape status = | ||
Surveys in 2002 and 2007 show that orangutan populations can be maintained in forests that have been lightly and sustainably logged (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). However, in heavily logged forests there was a decline in orangutan numbers (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). Nest distribution in the forests of Ulu Segama Malua indicates that orangutans leave areas undergoing active disturbance, reaching forests that are located up to 500 meters above sea level (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). | Surveys in 2002 and 2007 show that orangutan populations can be maintained in forests that have been lightly and sustainably logged (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). However, in heavily logged forests there was a decline in orangutan numbers (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). Nest distribution in the forests of Ulu Segama Malua indicates that orangutans leave areas undergoing active disturbance, reaching forests that are located up to 500 meters above sea level (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). | ||
− | '''Table 2. Ape population estimates | + | '''Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Ulu Segama-Malua''' |
− | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class=" | + | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Ape_status-table" |
− | ! Species | + | !Species |
− | ! Year | + | !Year |
− | ! | + | !Occurrence |
− | ! Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | + | !Encounter or vistation rate (nests/km; ind/day) |
− | ! | + | !Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) |
− | ! | + | !Abundance estimate (95% CI) |
− | ! | + | !Survey area |
− | ! Source | + | !Sampling method |
− | ! Comments | + | !Analytical framework |
− | ! A.P.E.S. database ID | + | !Source |
+ | !Comments | ||
+ | !A.P.E.S. database ID | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''Pongo pygmaeus morio'' | |''Pongo pygmaeus morio'' | ||
|2002 | |2002 | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |4,584 (2,064-11,064) | ||
|Segama forests | |Segama forests | ||
− | |Aerial | + | |Aerial (drones/plane/helicopter) |
+ | | | ||
|Ancrenaz et al. 2005 | |Ancrenaz et al. 2005 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 67: | Line 75: | ||
|''Pongo pygmaeus morio'' | |''Pongo pygmaeus morio'' | ||
|2007 | |2007 | ||
+ | | | ||
| | | | ||
|1.52 (0.5-4.1) | |1.52 (0.5-4.1) | ||
| | | | ||
|North Ulu Segama | |North Ulu Segama | ||
− | |Aerial | + | |Aerial (drones/plane/helicopter) |
+ | | | ||
|Ancrenaz et al. 2010 | |Ancrenaz et al. 2010 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 78: | Line 88: | ||
|''Pongo pygmaeus morio'' | |''Pongo pygmaeus morio'' | ||
|2007 | |2007 | ||
+ | | | ||
| | | | ||
|0.13 (0.04-0.39) | |0.13 (0.04-0.39) | ||
| | | | ||
|Segama East | |Segama East | ||
− | |Aerial | + | |Aerial (drones/plane/helicopter) |
+ | | | ||
|Ancrenaz et al. 2010 | |Ancrenaz et al. 2010 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 90: | Line 102: | ||
|2007 | |2007 | ||
| | | | ||
− | |0.79 (0.29-2.16) | + | | |
+ | |0.79 (0.29-2.16) | ||
| | | | ||
|Segama Central | |Segama Central | ||
− | |Aerial | + | |Aerial (drones/plane/helicopter) |
+ | | | ||
|Ancrenaz et al. 2010 | |Ancrenaz et al. 2010 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 100: | Line 114: | ||
|''Pongo pygmaeus morio'' | |''Pongo pygmaeus morio'' | ||
|2007 | |2007 | ||
+ | | | ||
| | | | ||
|1.76 (0.64-4.80) | |1.76 (0.64-4.80) | ||
| | | | ||
|Segama South West | |Segama South West | ||
− | |Aerial | + | |Aerial (drones/plane/helicopter) |
+ | | | ||
|Ancrenaz et al. 2010 | |Ancrenaz et al. 2010 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 111: | Line 127: | ||
|''Pongo pygmaeus morio'' | |''Pongo pygmaeus morio'' | ||
|2007 | |2007 | ||
+ | | | ||
| | | | ||
|1.64 (0.58-4.52) | |1.64 (0.58-4.52) | ||
| | | | ||
|Malua | |Malua | ||
− | |Aerial | + | |Aerial (drones/plane/helicopter) |
+ | | | ||
|Ancrenaz et al. 2010 | |Ancrenaz et al. 2010 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 122: | Line 140: | ||
|''Pongo pygmaeus morio'' | |''Pongo pygmaeus morio'' | ||
|2007 | |2007 | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |2,580 (1,295-5,866) | ||
|USM forests, total | |USM forests, total | ||
− | |Aerial | + | |Aerial (drones/plane/helicopter) |
+ | | | ||
|Ancrenaz et al. 2010 | |Ancrenaz et al. 2010 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 132: | Line 152: | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | = Threats = | + | = Threats = |
Surveys in 2002 and 2007 show that orangutan populations can be maintained in forests that have been lightly and sustainably logged (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). However, in heavily logged forests there was a decline in orangutan numbers (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). Nest distribution in the forests of Ulu Segama Malua indicates that orangutans leave areas undergoing active disturbance, reaching forests that are located up to 500 meters above sea level (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). | Surveys in 2002 and 2007 show that orangutan populations can be maintained in forests that have been lightly and sustainably logged (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). However, in heavily logged forests there was a decline in orangutan numbers (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). Nest distribution in the forests of Ulu Segama Malua indicates that orangutans leave areas undergoing active disturbance, reaching forests that are located up to 500 meters above sea level (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). | ||
− | '''Table 3. Threats to apes | + | '''Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Ulu Segama-Malua''' |
− | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class=" | + | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Threats-table" |
− | ! | + | !Category |
− | !Specific threats | + | !Specific threats |
− | !Threat level | + | !Threat level |
− | + | !Description | |
− | !Description | + | !Year of threat |
− | !Year of threat | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |10 Geological events |
+ | | | ||
+ | |Absent | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |12 Other threat | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |Absent | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |2 | + | |2 Agriculture & aquaculture |
|2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | |2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | ||
− | |High | + | |High (more than 70% of population affected) |
− | |||
|Oil palm plantations surround the landscape, especially along the eastern and northern borders (Ancrenaz et al. 2010, WWF 2020). | |Oil palm plantations surround the landscape, especially along the eastern and northern borders (Ancrenaz et al. 2010, WWF 2020). | ||
− | |Ongoing (2020) | + | |2010-Ongoing (2020) |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | |4 | + | |4 Transportation & service corridors |
|4.1 Roads & railroads | |4.1 Roads & railroads | ||
− | |High | + | |High (more than 70% of population affected) |
− | |||
|Logging roads that are present in higher frequency in overdegraded forests (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). | |Logging roads that are present in higher frequency in overdegraded forests (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). | ||
|Ongoing (2010) | |Ongoing (2010) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |5 | + | |5 Biological resource use |
|5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | |5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | ||
− | |High | + | |High (more than 70% of population affected) |
− | |||
|Heavy logging has led to decreased orangutan abundance at the site, as well as forest fragmentation (Ancrenaz et al 2010). | |Heavy logging has led to decreased orangutan abundance at the site, as well as forest fragmentation (Ancrenaz et al 2010). | ||
|Ongoing (2010) | |Ongoing (2010) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |7 Natural system modifications |
+ | |7.1 Fire & fire suppression | ||
+ | |Present (unknown severity) | ||
+ | |Fires to clear land, but also due to severe droughts (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). | ||
+ | |Ongoing (2010) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |1 Residential & commercial development | ||
| | | | ||
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |3 Energy production & mining |
| | | | ||
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |6 Human intrusions & disturbance |
| | | | ||
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |8 Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases |
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
+ | |Unknown | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |9 Pollution |
| | | | ||
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |11 Climate change & severe weather |
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
− | = Conservation activities = | + | [https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/threat-classification-scheme IUCN Threats list] |
+ | = Conservation activities = | ||
Conventional logging practices and heavy extraction rates, coupled with high road densities and indiscriminate felling, has resulted in a mosaic of highly degraded forests bordering hilltops and isolated patches of moderate habitat; in other words, habitat in the USM landscape is very heterogeneous (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). Multiple logging cycles that began in 1957 and ended in 2007 led to drastic alterations in the original forest structure and integrity (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). Forest fragmentation has forced the orangutan population to spread into less suitable habitats (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). | Conventional logging practices and heavy extraction rates, coupled with high road densities and indiscriminate felling, has resulted in a mosaic of highly degraded forests bordering hilltops and isolated patches of moderate habitat; in other words, habitat in the USM landscape is very heterogeneous (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). Multiple logging cycles that began in 1957 and ended in 2007 led to drastic alterations in the original forest structure and integrity (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). Forest fragmentation has forced the orangutan population to spread into less suitable habitats (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). | ||
− | '''Table 4. Conservation activities | + | '''Table 4. Conservation activities reported for Ulu Segama-Malua''' |
− | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class=" | + | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Conservation_activities-table" |
− | ! | + | !Category |
− | !Specific activity | + | !Specific activity |
− | !Description | + | !Description |
− | !Year of activity | + | !Implementing organization(s) |
+ | !Year of activity | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |5 Protection & restoration |
− | | | + | |5.6 Habitat restoration |
+ | |Restoration in the Bukit Piton forest is intended to have a positive impact on the rest of the landscape by connecting key patches of forest (WWF 2020). | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |Ongoing (2020) | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)]] | ||
+ | = Challenges = | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Table 5. Challenges reported for Ulu Segama-Malua''' | ||
+ | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Challenges-table" | ||
+ | !Challenges | ||
+ | !Specific challenges | ||
+ | !Source | ||
+ | !Year(s) | ||
+ | |- | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|Not reported | |Not reported | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | = Enablers = | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Table 6. Enablers reported for Ulu Segama-Malua''' | ||
+ | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="enabler-table" | ||
+ | !Enablers | ||
+ | !Specific enablers | ||
+ | !Source | ||
+ | !Year(s) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |1 Site management |
− | | | + | | |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |2 Resources and capacity |
− | | | + | | |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |3 Engaged community |
− | |||
| | | | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |4 Institutional support |
− | |||
| | | | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |5 Ecological context |
− | |||
| | | | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |6 Safety and stability |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
− | = | + | = Research activities = |
+ | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | = | + | = Documented behaviours = |
+ | |||
− | |||
− | '''Table | + | '''Table 7. Behaviours documented for Ulu Segama-Malua''' |
− | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class=" | + | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="behaviours-table" |
− | ! | + | !Behavior |
!Source | !Source | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Not reported | |Not reported | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
|} | |} | ||
− | =External links= | + | = Exposure to climate change impacts = |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | = External links = | ||
+ | |||
[http://www.forest.sabah.gov.my/usm/ Ulu Segama Malua - Sabah Forestry Department] | [http://www.forest.sabah.gov.my/usm/ Ulu Segama Malua - Sabah Forestry Department] | ||
− | + | = Relevant datasets = | |
− | + | ||
+ | |||
= References = | = References = | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | Ancrenaz, M., Ambu, L., Sunjoto, I., Ahmad, E., Manokaran, K., Meijaard, E., & Lackman, I. (2010). Recent surveys in the forests of Ulu Segama Malua, Sabah, Malaysia, show that orang-utans (P. p. morio) can be maintained in slightly logged forests. PLoS One, 5(7), e11510. | |
− | '''Page | + | |
+ | Ancrenaz, M., Gimenez, O., Ambu, L., Ancrenaz, K., Andau, P., Goossens, B., ... & Lackman-Ancrenaz, I. (2005). Aerial surveys give new estimates for orangutans in Sabah, Malaysia. PLoS Biology, 3(1), e3. | ||
+ | |||
+ | WWF (2020). Lessons Learnt from 12 Years Restoring the Orangutan’s Habitat: the Bukit Piton Forest Reserve in the Malaysian State of Sabah. Online: https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?364737/WWF-field-series-Lessons-learnt-from-restoring-the-orangutan-habitat-in-the-Malaysian-State-of-Sabah | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Page created by: '''A.P.E.S. Wiki team''' Date:''' NA |
Latest revision as of 09:13, 18 March 2025
Asia > Malaysia > Ulu Segama-Malua
Français | Português | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | Melayu
Summary
- Northeast Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus morio) are present in the Ulu Segama-Malua landscape.
- It has been estimated that 2,580 (CI: 1,295-5,866) individuals occur in the site.
- The orangutan population trend is unknown.
- The site has a total size of 2,400 km².
- Key threats to orangutans include logging, forest degradation and fragmentation.
- Conservation activities have focused on habitat restoration.
Site characteristics
The Ulu Segama-Malua (USM) landscape is located in the Malaysian state of Sabah between 116°28′E and 4°14′N and comprises approximately 240,000 hectares of lowland forest (WWF 2020, Ancrenaz et al. 2010). The site sustains one of the largest orangutan populations in Sabah (WWF 2020). To the north of USM, Bukit Piton Forest Reserve (12,000 ha) is found, which is an area of high conservation value (WWF 2020). The USM landscape consists of a variably steep terrain, with many hills and ridges, although Malua's topography is predominantly flat and low (Ancrenaz et al. 2010).
Table 1. Basic site information for Ulu Segama-Malua
Species | 'Pongo pygmaeus morio |
Area | 2,400 km² |
Coordinates | Lat: 4.956727 , Lon: 117.878134 |
Type of site | Non-protected area |
Habitat types | Subtropical/tropical moist lowland forest, Subtropical/tropical heavily degraded former forest |
Type of governance |
IUCN habitat categories Site designations
Ape status
Surveys in 2002 and 2007 show that orangutan populations can be maintained in forests that have been lightly and sustainably logged (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). However, in heavily logged forests there was a decline in orangutan numbers (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). Nest distribution in the forests of Ulu Segama Malua indicates that orangutans leave areas undergoing active disturbance, reaching forests that are located up to 500 meters above sea level (Ancrenaz et al. 2010).
Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Ulu Segama-Malua
Species | Year | Occurrence | Encounter or vistation rate (nests/km; ind/day) | Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | Abundance estimate (95% CI) | Survey area | Sampling method | Analytical framework | Source | Comments | A.P.E.S. database ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pongo pygmaeus morio | 2002 | 4,584 (2,064-11,064) | Segama forests | Aerial (drones/plane/helicopter) | Ancrenaz et al. 2005 | ||||||
Pongo pygmaeus morio | 2007 | 1.52 (0.5-4.1) | North Ulu Segama | Aerial (drones/plane/helicopter) | Ancrenaz et al. 2010 | ||||||
Pongo pygmaeus morio | 2007 | 0.13 (0.04-0.39) | Segama East | Aerial (drones/plane/helicopter) | Ancrenaz et al. 2010 | ||||||
Pongo pygmaeus morio | 2007 | 0.79 (0.29-2.16) | Segama Central | Aerial (drones/plane/helicopter) | Ancrenaz et al. 2010 | ||||||
Pongo pygmaeus morio | 2007 | 1.76 (0.64-4.80) | Segama South West | Aerial (drones/plane/helicopter) | Ancrenaz et al. 2010 | ||||||
Pongo pygmaeus morio | 2007 | 1.64 (0.58-4.52) | Malua | Aerial (drones/plane/helicopter) | Ancrenaz et al. 2010 | ||||||
Pongo pygmaeus morio | 2007 | 2,580 (1,295-5,866) | USM forests, total | Aerial (drones/plane/helicopter) | Ancrenaz et al. 2010 |
Threats
Surveys in 2002 and 2007 show that orangutan populations can be maintained in forests that have been lightly and sustainably logged (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). However, in heavily logged forests there was a decline in orangutan numbers (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). Nest distribution in the forests of Ulu Segama Malua indicates that orangutans leave areas undergoing active disturbance, reaching forests that are located up to 500 meters above sea level (Ancrenaz et al. 2010).
Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Ulu Segama-Malua
Category | Specific threats | Threat level | Description | Year of threat |
---|---|---|---|---|
10 Geological events | Absent | |||
12 Other threat | Absent | |||
2 Agriculture & aquaculture | 2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Oil palm plantations surround the landscape, especially along the eastern and northern borders (Ancrenaz et al. 2010, WWF 2020). | 2010-Ongoing (2020) |
4 Transportation & service corridors | 4.1 Roads & railroads | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Logging roads that are present in higher frequency in overdegraded forests (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). | Ongoing (2010) |
5 Biological resource use | 5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Heavy logging has led to decreased orangutan abundance at the site, as well as forest fragmentation (Ancrenaz et al 2010). | Ongoing (2010) |
7 Natural system modifications | 7.1 Fire & fire suppression | Present (unknown severity) | Fires to clear land, but also due to severe droughts (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). | Ongoing (2010) |
1 Residential & commercial development | Unknown | |||
3 Energy production & mining | Unknown | |||
6 Human intrusions & disturbance | Unknown | |||
8 Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases | Unknown | |||
9 Pollution | Unknown | |||
11 Climate change & severe weather | Unknown |
Conservation activities
Conventional logging practices and heavy extraction rates, coupled with high road densities and indiscriminate felling, has resulted in a mosaic of highly degraded forests bordering hilltops and isolated patches of moderate habitat; in other words, habitat in the USM landscape is very heterogeneous (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). Multiple logging cycles that began in 1957 and ended in 2007 led to drastic alterations in the original forest structure and integrity (Ancrenaz et al. 2010). Forest fragmentation has forced the orangutan population to spread into less suitable habitats (Ancrenaz et al. 2010).
Table 4. Conservation activities reported for Ulu Segama-Malua
Category | Specific activity | Description | Implementing organization(s) | Year of activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
5 Protection & restoration | 5.6 Habitat restoration | Restoration in the Bukit Piton forest is intended to have a positive impact on the rest of the landscape by connecting key patches of forest (WWF 2020). | Ongoing (2020) |
Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)
Challenges
Table 5. Challenges reported for Ulu Segama-Malua
Challenges | Specific challenges | Source | Year(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Not reported |
Enablers
Table 6. Enablers reported for Ulu Segama-Malua
Enablers | Specific enablers | Source | Year(s) |
---|---|---|---|
1 Site management | |||
2 Resources and capacity | |||
3 Engaged community | |||
4 Institutional support | |||
5 Ecological context | |||
6 Safety and stability |
Research activities
Documented behaviours
Table 7. Behaviours documented for Ulu Segama-Malua
Behavior | Source |
---|---|
Not reported |
Exposure to climate change impacts
External links
Ulu Segama Malua - Sabah Forestry Department
Relevant datasets
References
Ancrenaz, M., Ambu, L., Sunjoto, I., Ahmad, E., Manokaran, K., Meijaard, E., & Lackman, I. (2010). Recent surveys in the forests of Ulu Segama Malua, Sabah, Malaysia, show that orang-utans (P. p. morio) can be maintained in slightly logged forests. PLoS One, 5(7), e11510.
Ancrenaz, M., Gimenez, O., Ambu, L., Ancrenaz, K., Andau, P., Goossens, B., ... & Lackman-Ancrenaz, I. (2005). Aerial surveys give new estimates for orangutans in Sabah, Malaysia. PLoS Biology, 3(1), e3.
WWF (2020). Lessons Learnt from 12 Years Restoring the Orangutan’s Habitat: the Bukit Piton Forest Reserve in the Malaysian State of Sabah. Online: https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?364737/WWF-field-series-Lessons-learnt-from-restoring-the-orangutan-habitat-in-the-Malaysian-State-of-Sabah
Page created by: A.P.E.S. Wiki team Date: NA