Difference between revisions of "West Nimba Community Forest"

From A.P.E.S. wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "<!-- INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING Site INFORMATION - Wiki site pages contain information in paragraphs of text, tables, keyword lists, and images - Text paragraphs and images a...")
 
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
     to the relevant table or keyword list. This ensures that the same keyword always refers to the same concept, e.g. Everybody uses "Industrial mining",  
 
     to the relevant table or keyword list. This ensures that the same keyword always refers to the same concept, e.g. Everybody uses "Industrial mining",  
 
     rather than several keywords such as "Industrial mining", "Large-scale mining", and "Mining".  
 
     rather than several keywords such as "Industrial mining", "Large-scale mining", and "Mining".  
 +
[[File: Map_LBR_WestNimba_PPA_WGS84.png | 400px | thumb| right | West Nimba Community Forest (Liberia) © A.P.E.S. Wiki Team]]
 
-->
 
-->
 
<!-- Please add information for this site -->
 
<!-- Please add information for this site -->
Line 13: Line 14:
  
 
= Summary =  <!-- An overview of the site, with a one sentence overview of each of the following sections. can include a site map -->
 
= Summary =  <!-- An overview of the site, with a one sentence overview of each of the following sections. can include a site map -->
 
+
<div style="float: right">
* Western chimpanzees ([https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/15935/17989872 ''Pan troglodytes verus'']) are present in West Nimba Community Forest.  
+
{{#display_map: height=200px | width=290px | scrollzoom=off | zoom=5 | layers= OpenStreetMap, OpenTopoMap
 +
|7.48, -8.71~[[West Nimba Community Forest]]~Western Chimpanzee
 +
}}
 +
</div>
 +
* Western chimpanzees (''Pan troglodytes verus'') are present in West Nimba Community Forest.  
 
* The population size is 26 individuals.  
 
* The population size is 26 individuals.  
 
* The chimpanzee population trend is unknown.  
 
* The chimpanzee population trend is unknown.  
Line 25: Line 30:
 
Nimba County is located in the western part of the Upper Guinea Ecoregion, which extends from Sierra Leone to the Sassandra River in Côte d’Ivoire. The West Upper Guinea forest ecosystem is characterized by exceptional biological richness and the endemism of its flora and fauna (CI 2012). West Nimba Community Forest is part of the Northern Nimba Conservation Area (NNCA), which is located in northeastern Liberia. The latter forms an integral part of the northeastern forest block of the country. The NNCA is comprised of the East Nimba Nature Reserve (ENNR), West Nimba Community Forest, ArcelorMittal Liberia (AML) concessions, and several towns. The area spans two districts of Nimba County: Yarmein and Gbelegay (CI 2012). Mount Nimba, which spans three countries, is one of the most famous sites for biodiversity conservation in West Africa and has been identified as a priority biodiversity hotspot for conservation (CI 2012). West Nimba was once designated a proposed protected area (Junker et al. 2015), but its protected status was modified later on (Johnson 2015). The following species were recorded in West Nimba Community Forest: western lesser spot-nosed monkey ''Cercopithecus petaurista buettikoferi'', Campbell’s monkey ''Cercopithecus campbelli'', sooty mangabey ''Cercocebus atys'' and the vulnerable king colobus ''Colobus polykomos'', the near threatened bay duiker ''Cephalophus dorsalis'' and African buffalo ''Syncerus caffer'', bush buck ''Tragelaphus scriptus'', leopard ''Panthera pardus'' and African civet ''Civettictis civetta'' (CI 2012).
 
Nimba County is located in the western part of the Upper Guinea Ecoregion, which extends from Sierra Leone to the Sassandra River in Côte d’Ivoire. The West Upper Guinea forest ecosystem is characterized by exceptional biological richness and the endemism of its flora and fauna (CI 2012). West Nimba Community Forest is part of the Northern Nimba Conservation Area (NNCA), which is located in northeastern Liberia. The latter forms an integral part of the northeastern forest block of the country. The NNCA is comprised of the East Nimba Nature Reserve (ENNR), West Nimba Community Forest, ArcelorMittal Liberia (AML) concessions, and several towns. The area spans two districts of Nimba County: Yarmein and Gbelegay (CI 2012). Mount Nimba, which spans three countries, is one of the most famous sites for biodiversity conservation in West Africa and has been identified as a priority biodiversity hotspot for conservation (CI 2012). West Nimba was once designated a proposed protected area (Junker et al. 2015), but its protected status was modified later on (Johnson 2015). The following species were recorded in West Nimba Community Forest: western lesser spot-nosed monkey ''Cercopithecus petaurista buettikoferi'', Campbell’s monkey ''Cercopithecus campbelli'', sooty mangabey ''Cercocebus atys'' and the vulnerable king colobus ''Colobus polykomos'', the near threatened bay duiker ''Cephalophus dorsalis'' and African buffalo ''Syncerus caffer'', bush buck ''Tragelaphus scriptus'', leopard ''Panthera pardus'' and African civet ''Civettictis civetta'' (CI 2012).
  
 
+
'''Table 1. Basic site information for West Nimba Community Forest'''
'''Table 1: Basic site information for West Nimba Community Forest'''
 
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="basic-information"
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="basic-information"
 
|Area            <!-- Please include units: km2/ha e.g 200ha    -->
 
|Area            <!-- Please include units: km2/ha e.g 200ha    -->
Line 32: Line 36:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Coordinates
 
|Coordinates
|7.55 N, -8.63 W
+
|7.48, -8.71
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Designation      <!-- National Park, Nature Reserve, etc.  -->
 
|Designation      <!-- National Park, Nature Reserve, etc.  -->
Line 41: Line 45:
 
|}
 
|}
 
[http://www.unitar.org/hiroshima/sites/unitar.org.hiroshima/files/Annex%201%20-%20IUCN%20Classification%20Schemes.pdf IUCN habitat categories]  [[Site designations]]
 
[http://www.unitar.org/hiroshima/sites/unitar.org.hiroshima/files/Annex%201%20-%20IUCN%20Classification%20Schemes.pdf IUCN habitat categories]  [[Site designations]]
<br>
 
  
 
= Ape status =  <!-- a text overview of ape status (population sizes, trends etc), followed by a table of specific surveys and results -->
 
= Ape status =  <!-- a text overview of ape status (population sizes, trends etc), followed by a table of specific surveys and results -->
Line 48: Line 51:
 
from 2010-2011, the study area was divided into three different sites: the Gangra-Yuelliton site (21.26 km²) where mining will be carried out, the Tokadeh site (19.88 km², under exploitation since May 2011) and the West Nimba site (79.97 km², the remaining West Nimba forest). The chimpanzee population was estimated at 26 individuals with a density of 0.21 chimpanzees/ km².  
 
from 2010-2011, the study area was divided into three different sites: the Gangra-Yuelliton site (21.26 km²) where mining will be carried out, the Tokadeh site (19.88 km², under exploitation since May 2011) and the West Nimba site (79.97 km², the remaining West Nimba forest). The chimpanzee population was estimated at 26 individuals with a density of 0.21 chimpanzees/ km².  
  
 
+
'''Table 2. Great ape population estimates in West Nimba Community Forest'''
'''Table 2: Great ape population estimates in West Nimba Community Forest'''
 
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="population-estimate-table"
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="population-estimate-table"
 
! Species
 
! Species
 
! Year
 
! Year
! Abundance estimate (95% confidence interval)
+
! Abundance estimate (95% CI)
! Density estimate (per km²)
+
! Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI)
 
! Encounter rate (nests/km)
 
! Encounter rate (nests/km)
 
! Area
 
! Area
Line 87: Line 89:
 
= Threats =    <!-- a text overview of threats, followed by a table of key threats -->
 
= Threats =    <!-- a text overview of threats, followed by a table of key threats -->
  
Mount Nimba was exploited for iron ore by LAMCO from the 1960s until the early 1990s. A large part of West Nimba’s forest comprising the Gangra Mountain, the Yuelliton Mountain and the Tokadeh Mountain has been granted for iron ore mining to AML (CI 2012). AML holds a Class A mining license, which entails that mining is permitted in the proposed production area (no size limit) for at least 25 years (Wilson et al. 2017). The 2010-2011 survey results showed that the chimpanzee distribution range overlaps largely with the mining sites (CI 2012). The bushmeat study that was conducted by CI (2012) in West Nimba Community Forest showed that hunting had a huge impact on wildlife in the area (CI 2012). Ancestral hunting methods had all but disappeared and been replaced by cable snares and shotguns year-round without regard for legislation. Traps accounted for 41% of the off-takes and catch both small and big game, guns, most of which were locally built, accounted for 58% of the off-takes and were used both day and night (CI 2012). The sources of water pollution are erosion at the mine site, waste dumps and stockpiles, oil and grease, discharge from settlement and attenuation ponds, and ore handling and loading. However, ore will not be processed for DSO Phase 1, which will eliminate some potential sources of pollution, but investigations revealed that the head of streams and downstream larger rivers would be affected (CI 2012).
+
Mount Nimba was exploited for iron ore by LAMCO from the 1960s until the early 1990s. A large part of West Nimba’s forest comprising the Gangra Mountain, the Yuelliton Mountain and the Tokadeh Mountain has been granted for iron ore mining to AML (CI 2012). AML holds a Class A mining licence, which entails that mining is permitted in the proposed production area (no size limit) for at least 25 years (Wilson et al. 2017). The 2010-2011 survey results showed that the chimpanzee distribution range overlaps largely with the mining sites (CI 2012). The bushmeat study that was conducted by CI (2012) in West Nimba Community Forest showed that hunting had a huge impact on wildlife in the area (CI 2012). Ancestral hunting methods had all but disappeared and been replaced by cable snares and shotguns year-round without regard for legislation. Traps accounted for 41% of the off-takes and caught both small and big game; guns, most of which were locally built, accounted for 58% of the off-takes and were used both day and night (CI 2012). The sources of water pollution are erosion at the mine site, waste dumps and stockpiles, oil and grease, discharge from settlement and attenuation ponds, and ore handling and loading. However, ore will not be processed for DSO Phase 1, which will eliminate some potential sources of pollution, but investigations revealed that the head of streams and downstream larger rivers would be affected (CI 2012).
 
 
  
'''Table 3: Threats to great apes in West Nimba Community Forest'''
+
'''Table 3. Threats to great apes in West Nimba Community Forest'''
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="threats-table"
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="threats-table"
 
!align="left"|Category  <!-- Do not change threat categories -->
 
!align="left"|Category  <!-- Do not change threat categories -->
Line 107: Line 108:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2. Agriculture & aquaculture
 
|2. Agriculture & aquaculture
|2.1 Annual & Perennial Non-Timber Crops
+
|2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops
 
|Medium
 
|Medium
 
|Encounter rate: 0.58 farms/ km surveyed
 
|Encounter rate: 0.58 farms/ km surveyed
Line 114: Line 115:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|3. Energy production & mining
 
|3. Energy production & mining
|3.2 Mining & Quarrying
+
|3.2 Mining & quarrying
 
|High
 
|High
 
|Encounter rate: 0.68 mining signs/ km surveyed
 
|Encounter rate: 0.68 mining signs/ km surveyed
Line 128: Line 129:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|5. Biological resource use
 
|5. Biological resource use
|5.1 Hunting & Collecting Terrestrial Animals
+
|5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals
 
|High
 
|High
 
|Hunting sign encounter rates: 0.02 hunting camps-, 3.2 hunting trails-, and 0.08 gun shots heard/ km surveyed
 
|Hunting sign encounter rates: 0.02 hunting camps-, 3.2 hunting trails-, and 0.08 gun shots heard/ km surveyed
Line 135: Line 136:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
|5.3 Logging & Wood Harvesting
+
|5.3 Logging & wood harvesting
 
|Medium
 
|Medium
 
|Encounter rate: 0.5 logging signs/ km surveyed
 
|Encounter rate: 0.5 logging signs/ km surveyed
Line 163: Line 164:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|9. Pollution
 
|9. Pollution
|9.2 Industrial & Military Effluents
+
|9.2 Industrial & military effluents
 
|High
 
|High
 
|
 
|
Line 170: Line 171:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|
 
|
|9.6 Excess Energy
+
|9.6 Excess energy
 
|High
 
|High
 
|
 
|
Line 202: Line 203:
 
= Conservation activities =      <!-- a text overview of conservation activities, followed by a table of key activities -->
 
= Conservation activities =      <!-- a text overview of conservation activities, followed by a table of key activities -->
  
No conservation activities could be found for the site.
+
'''Table 4. Conservation activities in West Nimba Community Forest'''
 
 
 
 
'''Table 4: Conservation activities in West Nimba Community Forest'''
 
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="conservation-actions-table"
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="conservation-actions-table"
 
!align="left"|Category  <!-- Do not change threat categories -->
 
!align="left"|Category  <!-- Do not change threat categories -->
Line 280: Line 278:
 
[[Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)]]
 
[[Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)]]
  
= Impediments = <!-- Overview of impediments to ape conservation -->
+
= Challenges = <!-- Overview of impediments to ape conservation -->
 
 
No information on impediments has been documented.
 
  
 
+
'''Table 5. Challenges reported for West Nimba Community Forest'''
'''Table 5: Impediments reported for West Nimba Community Forest'''
+
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="challenges-table"
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="impediments-table"
+
!align="left"|Challenge <!-- Do not change categories -->
!align="left"|Impediment <!-- Do not change categories -->
 
 
!Source  <!-- source for impediment mentioned -->
 
!Source  <!-- source for impediment mentioned -->
 
|-
 
|-
Line 295: Line 290:
  
 
= Research activities = <!-- Overview of research activities -->
 
= Research activities = <!-- Overview of research activities -->
 
No information on research activities has been documented.
 
  
  
 
===Documented behaviours===  <!-- List of any behaviours observed at the site, including citations -->
 
===Documented behaviours===  <!-- List of any behaviours observed at the site, including citations -->
  
 
+
'''Table 6. Great ape behaviors reported for West Nimba Community Forest'''
'''Table 6: Great ape behaviors reported for West Nimba Community Forest'''
 
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="behaviors-table"
 
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="behaviors-table"
 
!align="left"|Behavior  <!-- Do not change categories -->
 
!align="left"|Behavior  <!-- Do not change categories -->
Line 311: Line 303:
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
===Relevant datasets===
 
[http://apesportal.eva.mpg.de/database/archiveMap A.P.E.S Portal]
 
 
<br>
 
  
 
= References =
 
= References =
Line 321: Line 308:
 
Johnson S. 2015. Aggregated Biodiversity Offsets: A Roadmap for Liberia’s Mining Sector. Unpublished report by the World Bank Group (WBG) and Program On Forests (PROFOR).<br>
 
Johnson S. 2015. Aggregated Biodiversity Offsets: A Roadmap for Liberia’s Mining Sector. Unpublished report by the World Bank Group (WBG) and Program On Forests (PROFOR).<br>
 
Junker J, Boesch C, Freeman T, Mundry R, Stephens C, Kühl HS. 2015. Integrating wildlife conservation with conflicting economic land-use goals in a West African biodiversity hotspot. Basic and Applied Ecology: doi:10.1016/j.baae.2015.07.002.<br>
 
Junker J, Boesch C, Freeman T, Mundry R, Stephens C, Kühl HS. 2015. Integrating wildlife conservation with conflicting economic land-use goals in a West African biodiversity hotspot. Basic and Applied Ecology: doi:10.1016/j.baae.2015.07.002.<br>
Wilson STK, Wang H, Kabenge M, Qi X. 2017. The mining sector of Liberia: current practices and environmental challenges. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24: 18711–18720.<br>
+
Wilson STK, Wang H, Kabenge M, Qi X. 2017. The mining sector of Liberia: current practices and environmental challenges. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24: 18711–18720.<br>
  
  
<br>
 
 
'''Page completed by:''' A.P.E.S. Wiki Team '''Date:''' 11/11/2019  <!-- If you don't want to add your name, you can add "A.P.E.S. Wiki team" -->
 
'''Page completed by:''' A.P.E.S. Wiki Team '''Date:''' 11/11/2019  <!-- If you don't want to add your name, you can add "A.P.E.S. Wiki team" -->
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>

Latest revision as of 13:46, 29 July 2023

West Africa > Liberia > West Nimba Community Forest

Summary

Loading map...
  • Western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) are present in West Nimba Community Forest.
  • The population size is 26 individuals.
  • The chimpanzee population trend is unknown.
  • This site has a total size of 105 km².
  • Key threats to chimpanzees are large-scale mining and poaching.
  • West Nimba has been removed from the list of proposed protected areas and become a community forest (Johnson 2015). At least one of three chimpanzee communities in West Nimba Community Forest lives directly west of one of the mining sites. The Nimba Mountains are an Alliance Zero Extinction (AZE) site.

Site characteristics

Nimba County is located in the western part of the Upper Guinea Ecoregion, which extends from Sierra Leone to the Sassandra River in Côte d’Ivoire. The West Upper Guinea forest ecosystem is characterized by exceptional biological richness and the endemism of its flora and fauna (CI 2012). West Nimba Community Forest is part of the Northern Nimba Conservation Area (NNCA), which is located in northeastern Liberia. The latter forms an integral part of the northeastern forest block of the country. The NNCA is comprised of the East Nimba Nature Reserve (ENNR), West Nimba Community Forest, ArcelorMittal Liberia (AML) concessions, and several towns. The area spans two districts of Nimba County: Yarmein and Gbelegay (CI 2012). Mount Nimba, which spans three countries, is one of the most famous sites for biodiversity conservation in West Africa and has been identified as a priority biodiversity hotspot for conservation (CI 2012). West Nimba was once designated a proposed protected area (Junker et al. 2015), but its protected status was modified later on (Johnson 2015). The following species were recorded in West Nimba Community Forest: western lesser spot-nosed monkey Cercopithecus petaurista buettikoferi, Campbell’s monkey Cercopithecus campbelli, sooty mangabey Cercocebus atys and the vulnerable king colobus Colobus polykomos, the near threatened bay duiker Cephalophus dorsalis and African buffalo Syncerus caffer, bush buck Tragelaphus scriptus, leopard Panthera pardus and African civet Civettictis civetta (CI 2012).

Table 1. Basic site information for West Nimba Community Forest

Area 105 km²
Coordinates 7.48, -8.71
Designation Community Forest
Habitat types Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane Forest, Subtropical/Tropical Swamp Forest, Subtropical/Tropical Heavily Degraded Former Forest, Rural Gardens

IUCN habitat categories Site designations

Ape status

According to the literature, the area was first surveyed in 2005 by Fauna & Flora International (FFI), in collaboration with the Forestry Development Authority (FDA), the Environmental Protection Agency of Liberia (EPA), and the Ministry of Planning and Economic Affairs (MPEA). While chimpanzees were apparently recorded during this survey (CI 2012), no further details on the survey results could be found. During another survey conducted by Conservation International (CI), in collaboration with the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation (WCF), Actions pour la Conservation de la Biodiversité (ACB-CI), and AML from 2010-2011, the study area was divided into three different sites: the Gangra-Yuelliton site (21.26 km²) where mining will be carried out, the Tokadeh site (19.88 km², under exploitation since May 2011) and the West Nimba site (79.97 km², the remaining West Nimba forest). The chimpanzee population was estimated at 26 individuals with a density of 0.21 chimpanzees/ km².

Table 2. Great ape population estimates in West Nimba Community Forest

Species Year Abundance estimate (95% CI) Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) Encounter rate (nests/km) Area Method Source Comments A.P.E.S. database ID
Pan troglodytes verus 2005 Present West Nimba Community Forest Index survey FFI 2005 in Johnson 2015 ‘BIOPA’ in CI 2012, Johnson 2015; ‘reconnaissance walk’; collaborative effort of FFI, FDA, EPA, MPEA (Johnson 2015)
Pan troglodytes verus 2010-2011 26 (10-67) 0.21 (0.05-0.55) Gangra-Yuelliton:1.97; Tokadeh 0.4; West Nimba 0.74 West Nimba Community Forest Line transects (Distance) CI 2012 (in collaboration with the WCF, ACB-CI, AML) Survey effort: 122 km, study area: 121 km²

Threats

Mount Nimba was exploited for iron ore by LAMCO from the 1960s until the early 1990s. A large part of West Nimba’s forest comprising the Gangra Mountain, the Yuelliton Mountain and the Tokadeh Mountain has been granted for iron ore mining to AML (CI 2012). AML holds a Class A mining licence, which entails that mining is permitted in the proposed production area (no size limit) for at least 25 years (Wilson et al. 2017). The 2010-2011 survey results showed that the chimpanzee distribution range overlaps largely with the mining sites (CI 2012). The bushmeat study that was conducted by CI (2012) in West Nimba Community Forest showed that hunting had a huge impact on wildlife in the area (CI 2012). Ancestral hunting methods had all but disappeared and been replaced by cable snares and shotguns year-round without regard for legislation. Traps accounted for 41% of the off-takes and caught both small and big game; guns, most of which were locally built, accounted for 58% of the off-takes and were used both day and night (CI 2012). The sources of water pollution are erosion at the mine site, waste dumps and stockpiles, oil and grease, discharge from settlement and attenuation ponds, and ore handling and loading. However, ore will not be processed for DSO Phase 1, which will eliminate some potential sources of pollution, but investigations revealed that the head of streams and downstream larger rivers would be affected (CI 2012).

Table 3. Threats to great apes in West Nimba Community Forest

Category Specific threats Threat level Quantified severity Description Year of threat
1. Residential & commercial development Unknown
2. Agriculture & aquaculture 2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops Medium Encounter rate: 0.58 farms/ km surveyed Cassava farms, cocoa farms, coffee farms, plantain farms, rice farms, new forest cutting and old farms (CI 2012) Ongoing (2012)
3. Energy production & mining 3.2 Mining & quarrying High Encounter rate: 0.68 mining signs/ km surveyed Open-pit mining for iron ore (CI 2012) Ongoing (2012)
4. Transportation & service corridors Unknown
5. Biological resource use 5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals High Hunting sign encounter rates: 0.02 hunting camps-, 3.2 hunting trails-, and 0.08 gun shots heard/ km surveyed Hunting signs recorded during line transect survey (CI 2012) Ongoing (2012)
5.3 Logging & wood harvesting Medium Encounter rate: 0.5 logging signs/ km surveyed Logging signs recorded during line transect survey (CI 2012) Ongoing (2012)
6. Human intrusions & disturbance Unknown
7. Natural system modifications Unknown
8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases Unknown
9. Pollution 9.2 Industrial & military effluents High Water-, and air pollution caused by open-pit mining operations at this site (CI 2012) Ongoing (2012)
9.6 Excess energy High Noise from mining activities (CI 2012) Ongoing (2012)
10. Geological Events Absent
11. Climate change & severe weather Unknown
12. Other options Absent

IUCN Threats list

Conservation activities

Table 4. Conservation activities in West Nimba Community Forest

Category Specific activity Description Year of activity
1. Residential & commercial development Not reported
2. Agriculture & aquaculture Not reported
3. Energy production & mining Not reported
4. Transportation & service corridors Not reported
5. Biological resource use Not reported
6. Human intrusions & disturbance Not reported
7. Natural system modifications Not reported
8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases Not reported
9. Pollution Not reported
10. Education & Awareness Not reported
11. Habitat Protection Not reported
12. Species Management Not reported
13. Livelihood; Economic & Other Incentives Not reported

Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)

Challenges

Table 5. Challenges reported for West Nimba Community Forest

Challenge Source
Not reported

Research activities

Documented behaviours

Table 6. Great ape behaviors reported for West Nimba Community Forest

Behavior Source
Not reported


References

Conservation International (CI) 2012. Further Ecological Studies as Part of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for Arcelormittal Liberia: Bushmeat and Biomonitoring Studies in the Northern Nimba Conservation Area. Unpublished report. Conservation International and ArcelorMittal, Liberia.
Johnson S. 2015. Aggregated Biodiversity Offsets: A Roadmap for Liberia’s Mining Sector. Unpublished report by the World Bank Group (WBG) and Program On Forests (PROFOR).
Junker J, Boesch C, Freeman T, Mundry R, Stephens C, Kühl HS. 2015. Integrating wildlife conservation with conflicting economic land-use goals in a West African biodiversity hotspot. Basic and Applied Ecology: doi:10.1016/j.baae.2015.07.002.
Wilson STK, Wang H, Kabenge M, Qi X. 2017. The mining sector of Liberia: current practices and environmental challenges. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24: 18711–18720.


Page completed by: A.P.E.S. Wiki Team Date: 11/11/2019