Difference between revisions of "Sangaredi"
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
= Summary = | = Summary = | ||
− | <div style="float: right">{{#display_map: height=190px | width=300px | scrollzoom=off | zoom=5 | layers= OpenStreetMap, OpenTopoMap|11.10, -13.79~[[Sangaredi]]~Pan troglodytes verus}}</div> | + | <div style="float: right">{{#display_map: height=190px | width=300px | scrollzoom=off | zoom=5 | layers= OpenStreetMap, OpenTopoMap|11.10, -13.79~[[Sangaredi]]~'Pan troglodytes verus''}}</div> |
* Western chimpanzees (''Pan troglodytes verus'') are present in Sangaredi. | * Western chimpanzees (''Pan troglodytes verus'') are present in Sangaredi. | ||
* It has been estimated that more than 200 individuals occurred in two neighboring bauxite mining concessions prior to mining exploitations. | * It has been estimated that more than 200 individuals occurred in two neighboring bauxite mining concessions prior to mining exploitations. | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Site_characteristics-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Site_characteristics-table" | ||
|Species | |Species | ||
− | |Pan troglodytes verus | + | |'Pan troglodytes verus'' |
|- | |- | ||
|Area | |Area | ||
− | | | + | |1,542 km² |
|- | |- | ||
|Coordinates | |Coordinates | ||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
!Species | !Species | ||
!Year | !Year | ||
+ | !Occurrence | ||
+ | !Encounter or vistation rate (nests/km; ind/day) | ||
+ | !Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | ||
!Abundance estimate (95% CI) | !Abundance estimate (95% CI) | ||
− | ! | + | !Survey area |
− | ! | + | !Sampling method |
− | ! | + | !Analytical framework |
− | |||
!Source | !Source | ||
!Comments | !Comments | ||
Line 61: | Line 63: | ||
|''Pan troglodytes verus'' | |''Pan troglodytes verus'' | ||
|1988 | |1988 | ||
+ | |Present | ||
+ | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
|Boké prefecture | |Boké prefecture | ||
|Interviews | |Interviews | ||
+ | | | ||
|Sugiyama & Soumah 1988 | |Sugiyama & Soumah 1988 | ||
|Questionnaire survey | |Questionnaire survey | ||
Line 72: | Line 76: | ||
|''Pan troglodytes verus'' | |''Pan troglodytes verus'' | ||
|1997 | |1997 | ||
+ | |Present | ||
+ | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
|Boké prefecture | |Boké prefecture | ||
|Interviews | |Interviews | ||
+ | | | ||
|Ham 1998 | |Ham 1998 | ||
|Questionnaire survey | |Questionnaire survey | ||
Line 83: | Line 89: | ||
|''Pan troglodytes verus'' | |''Pan troglodytes verus'' | ||
|2005 | |2005 | ||
+ | |Present | ||
+ | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
|Boulléré | |Boulléré | ||
|Reconnaissance walk | |Reconnaissance walk | ||
+ | | | ||
|Eriksson & Kpoghomou 2006 | |Eriksson & Kpoghomou 2006 | ||
|Total survey effort: 37.8 km; walking existing trail system | |Total survey effort: 37.8 km; walking existing trail system | ||
Line 94: | Line 102: | ||
|''Pan troglodytes verus'' | |''Pan troglodytes verus'' | ||
|2009 | |2009 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |0.11 | ||
|119 | |119 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|GAC concession (685 km²) | |GAC concession (685 km²) | ||
|Line transects | |Line transects | ||
+ | | | ||
|WCF 2012 | |WCF 2012 | ||
|Total survey effort: 537 km | |Total survey effort: 537 km | ||
Line 105: | Line 115: | ||
|''Pan troglodytes verus'' | |''Pan troglodytes verus'' | ||
|2010 | |2010 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |0.18 | ||
|190 | |190 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|GAC concession | |GAC concession | ||
|Line transects | |Line transects | ||
+ | | | ||
|WCF 2012 | |WCF 2012 | ||
|Total survey effort: 347 km | |Total survey effort: 347 km | ||
Line 116: | Line 128: | ||
|''Pan troglodytes verus'' | |''Pan troglodytes verus'' | ||
|2011 | |2011 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |0.25 | ||
|266 | |266 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|GAC concession | |GAC concession | ||
|Line transects | |Line transects | ||
+ | | | ||
|WCF 2012 | |WCF 2012 | ||
|Total survey effort: 339 km | |Total survey effort: 339 km | ||
Line 127: | Line 141: | ||
|''Pan troglodytes verus'' | |''Pan troglodytes verus'' | ||
|2012 | |2012 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |0.14 | ||
|142 | |142 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|GAC concession | |GAC concession | ||
|Line transects | |Line transects | ||
+ | | | ||
|WCF 2012 | |WCF 2012 | ||
|Total survey effort: 348 km | |Total survey effort: 348 km | ||
Line 138: | Line 154: | ||
|''Pan troglodytes verus'' | |''Pan troglodytes verus'' | ||
|2014 | |2014 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |0.25 | ||
|174 | |174 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|GAC concession | |GAC concession | ||
|Line transects | |Line transects | ||
+ | | | ||
|WCF 2014 | |WCF 2014 | ||
|Total survey effort: 254 km | |Total survey effort: 254 km | ||
Line 149: | Line 167: | ||
|''Pan troglodytes verus'' | |''Pan troglodytes verus'' | ||
|2015 | |2015 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |0.33 | ||
|252 (147-423) | |252 (147-423) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|GAC concession | |GAC concession | ||
|Line transects | |Line transects | ||
+ | | | ||
|WCF 2015 | |WCF 2015 | ||
|Total survey effort: 254 km | |Total survey effort: 254 km | ||
Line 160: | Line 180: | ||
|''Pan troglodytes verus'' | |''Pan troglodytes verus'' | ||
|2015 | |2015 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |0.1 | ||
|62 (33-118) | |62 (33-118) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|CBG Halco concession (530 km²) | |CBG Halco concession (530 km²) | ||
|Line transects | |Line transects | ||
+ | | | ||
|WCF 2015 | |WCF 2015 | ||
|Total survey effort: 139 km | |Total survey effort: 139 km | ||
Line 182: | Line 204: | ||
!Year of threat | !Year of threat | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |6 Human intrusions & disturbance |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | |Present (unknown severity) |
− | |Mining | + | |Fire are set for clearing areas for agricultural use (WCF 2014, Wright et al. 2006). |
− | | | + | |Ongoing (2014) |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |10 Geological events | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |Absent | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |12 Other threat | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |Absent | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |3 Energy production & mining | ||
+ | |3.2 Mining & quarrying | ||
+ | |High (more than 70% of population affected) | ||
+ | |Mining exploitation since 1973 (Environmental Justice Atlas 2019). | ||
+ | |1973-Ongoing (2019) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |5 Biological resource use |
− | | | + | |5.3 Logging & wood harvesting |
− | | | + | |High (more than 70% of population affected) |
− | | | + | |Wood-cutting mainly for charcoal (WCF 2015). |
|Ongoing (2015) | |Ongoing (2015) | ||
|- | |- | ||
|2 Agriculture & aquaculture | |2 Agriculture & aquaculture | ||
|2.3 Livestock farming & ranching | |2.3 Livestock farming & ranching | ||
− | |Low | + | |Low (up to 30% of population affected) |
− | |Detection of livestock on camera traps (WCF 2015) | + | |Detection of livestock on camera traps (WCF 2015). |
|Ongoing (2015) | |Ongoing (2015) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |1 Residential & commercial development |
− | | | + | |1.1 Residential areas |
− | | | + | |Medium (30-70% of population affected) |
− | |Mining | + | |Mining town of Sangaredi newly established (Environmental Justice Atlas 2019). |
|Since 1960s | |Since 1960s | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |2 Agriculture & aquaculture | ||
+ | |2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | ||
+ | |Medium (30-70% of population affected) | ||
+ | |Slash and burn agriculture and rice fields (WCF 2015, Wright et al. 2006). | ||
+ | |Ongoing (2015) | ||
|- | |- | ||
|4 Transportation & service corridors | |4 Transportation & service corridors | ||
|4.1 Roads & railroads | |4.1 Roads & railroads | ||
− | |Medium | + | |Medium (30-70% of population affected) |
− | |Road development for mining activities (Environmental Justice Atlas 2019) | + | |Road development for mining activities (Environmental Justice Atlas 2019). |
|Since 1960s | |Since 1960s | ||
|- | |- | ||
|5 Biological resource use | |5 Biological resource use | ||
|5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | |5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | ||
− | |Medium | + | |Medium (30-70% of population affected) |
− | | | + | |Bushmeat study confirmed hunting of primates (WCF 2014). |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|Ongoing (2014) | |Ongoing (2014) | ||
|- | |- | ||
|7 Natural system modifications | |7 Natural system modifications | ||
|7.1 Fire & fire suppression | |7.1 Fire & fire suppression | ||
− | |Medium | + | |Medium (30-70% of population affected) |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 244: | Line 272: | ||
|9 Pollution | |9 Pollution | ||
|9.2 Industrial & military effluents | |9.2 Industrial & military effluents | ||
− | |Medium | + | |Medium (30-70% of population affected) |
− | |Contamination of air, water and soil (Environmental Justice Atlas 2019) | + | |Contamination of air, water and soil (Environmental Justice Atlas 2019). |
|Since 1960s | |Since 1960s | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |8 Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases |
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 257: | Line 285: | ||
| | | | ||
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | |
Latest revision as of 09:57, 18 March 2025
West Africa > Republic of Guinea > Sangaredi
Français | Português | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | Melayu
Summary
- Western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) are present in Sangaredi.
- It has been estimated that more than 200 individuals occurred in two neighboring bauxite mining concessions prior to mining exploitations.
- The chimpanzee population trend is very likely declining due to mining activities.
- This site has a total size of 1542 km².
- Key threats to chimpanzees are mining and logging.
- The following conservation activities were implemented by the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation (WCF): environmental education (Club P.A.N. and theater plays) and forest regeneration.
- Sangaredi is a mining town and mining operations have been ongoing for several decades.
Site characteristics
Sangaredi is a mining town in the prefecture Boké in Guinea. Mining exploitation for bauxite began in 1973 and a railway connects the mining site to the port of Kamsar for the ore to be shipped overseas. Mining concessions around Sangaredi are owned by different mining companies, including the Bauxite Company of Guinea (CBG, owned by the Government of Guinea), Guinea Alumina Corporation (GAC) and Halco, with the latter two being consortia owned by transnational mining companies with changing ownership over the years.
Table 1. Basic site information for Sangaredi
Species | 'Pan troglodytes verus |
Area | 1,542 km² |
Coordinates | Lat: 11.10 , Lon: -13.79 |
Type of site | Non-protected area |
Habitat types | Subtropical/tropical heavily degraded former forest, Agricultural land, Savanna, Subtropical/tropical moist lowland forest, Wetlands (lakes, rivers, streams, bogs, marshes) |
Type of governance |
IUCN habitat categories Site designations
Ape status
Sugiyama and Soumah (1988) and Ham (1998) confirmed the presence of western chimpanzees throughout Boké prefecture. As part of a rapid biological assessment in 2005 in Boulléré just to the west of Sangaredi the presence of western chimpanzees was established by Eriksson and Kpoghomou (2006). The Wild Chimpanzee Foundation corporates with Guinea Alumina Corporation (GAC) since 2008 to assess the impact of mining on chimpanzees in their mining concession, and suggested mitigation measures (offset) as part of a comprehensive management plan (WCF 2011, WCF 2015). In 2015 WCF started working with the Bauxite Company of Guinea (CBG) on a concession neighboring the GAC concession (CBG Halco concession). As part of these collaborations, the WCF monitored the local chimpanzee population across several years and estimated a total chimpanzee abundance of more than 200 individuals around Sangaredi. A population trend assessment showed stable population from 2008 until 2014 in the GAC concession (Kühl et al. 2017). Nevertheless, with starting mining exploitation in these concessions and the ensuing habitat destruction and increase in anthropogenic pressures, the chimpanzee population is now very likely declining (WCF 2015).
Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Sangaredi
Species | Year | Occurrence | Encounter or vistation rate (nests/km; ind/day) | Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | Abundance estimate (95% CI) | Survey area | Sampling method | Analytical framework | Source | Comments | A.P.E.S. database ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pan troglodytes verus | 1988 | Present | Boké prefecture | Interviews | Sugiyama & Soumah 1988 | Questionnaire survey | |||||
Pan troglodytes verus | 1997 | Present | Boké prefecture | Interviews | Ham 1998 | Questionnaire survey | |||||
Pan troglodytes verus | 2005 | Present | Boulléré | Reconnaissance walk | Eriksson & Kpoghomou 2006 | Total survey effort: 37.8 km; walking existing trail system | |||||
Pan troglodytes verus | 2009 | 0.11 | 119 | GAC concession (685 km²) | Line transects | WCF 2012 | Total survey effort: 537 km | ||||
Pan troglodytes verus | 2010 | 0.18 | 190 | GAC concession | Line transects | WCF 2012 | Total survey effort: 347 km | ||||
Pan troglodytes verus | 2011 | 0.25 | 266 | GAC concession | Line transects | WCF 2012 | Total survey effort: 339 km | ||||
Pan troglodytes verus | 2012 | 0.14 | 142 | GAC concession | Line transects | WCF 2012 | Total survey effort: 348 km | ||||
Pan troglodytes verus | 2014 | 0.25 | 174 | GAC concession | Line transects | WCF 2014 | Total survey effort: 254 km | ||||
Pan troglodytes verus | 2015 | 0.33 | 252 (147-423) | GAC concession | Line transects | WCF 2015 | Total survey effort: 254 km | ||||
Pan troglodytes verus | 2015 | 0.1 | 62 (33-118) | CBG Halco concession (530 km²) | Line transects | WCF 2015 | Total survey effort: 139 km |
Threats
As mining operations have been ongoing since 1973 the ecosystem is strongly impacted by anthropogenic pressures, especially logging and charring, agriculture, mining, the construction of roads, the presence of settlements, as well as hunting and fishing, and livestock keeping (WCF 2014, WCF 2015). Mining exploitation was planned to start by 2016 in the GAC concession, but the current status is unclear. However, chimpanzee habitat has already been destroyed in the mining concession (WCF 2015). In connection with the mining project, concerns have been raised in relation to social issues (e.g., work insecurity, loss of livelihoods, displacement, and corruption), environmental damage by pollution (air, soil, and water), crop damage and changes in the hydrology (Environmental Justice Atlas 2019).
Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Sangaredi
Category | Specific threats | Threat level | Description | Year of threat |
---|---|---|---|---|
6 Human intrusions & disturbance | Present (unknown severity) | Fire are set for clearing areas for agricultural use (WCF 2014, Wright et al. 2006). | Ongoing (2014) | |
10 Geological events | Absent | |||
12 Other threat | Absent | |||
3 Energy production & mining | 3.2 Mining & quarrying | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Mining exploitation since 1973 (Environmental Justice Atlas 2019). | 1973-Ongoing (2019) |
5 Biological resource use | 5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Wood-cutting mainly for charcoal (WCF 2015). | Ongoing (2015) |
2 Agriculture & aquaculture | 2.3 Livestock farming & ranching | Low (up to 30% of population affected) | Detection of livestock on camera traps (WCF 2015). | Ongoing (2015) |
1 Residential & commercial development | 1.1 Residential areas | Medium (30-70% of population affected) | Mining town of Sangaredi newly established (Environmental Justice Atlas 2019). | Since 1960s |
2 Agriculture & aquaculture | 2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | Medium (30-70% of population affected) | Slash and burn agriculture and rice fields (WCF 2015, Wright et al. 2006). | Ongoing (2015) |
4 Transportation & service corridors | 4.1 Roads & railroads | Medium (30-70% of population affected) | Road development for mining activities (Environmental Justice Atlas 2019). | Since 1960s |
5 Biological resource use | 5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | Medium (30-70% of population affected) | Bushmeat study confirmed hunting of primates (WCF 2014). | Ongoing (2014) |
7 Natural system modifications | 7.1 Fire & fire suppression | Medium (30-70% of population affected) | ||
9 Pollution | 9.2 Industrial & military effluents | Medium (30-70% of population affected) | Contamination of air, water and soil (Environmental Justice Atlas 2019). | Since 1960s |
8 Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases | Unknown | |||
11 Climate change & severe weather | Unknown |
Conservation activities
Since 2008, the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation collaborates with the Guinea Alumina Project (GAP) to develop and implement a management plan to first minimize negative impacts on chimpanzees and offset any damage (WCF 2011). In 2011, the WCF proposed a management plan that was informed by the annual monitoring surveys that WCF conducted since 2009 (see above). When the ownership of the mining company changed, the area proposed for exploitation changed to the southwestern part of the concession and a new management plan was proposed by the WCF (WCF 2015). It is not clear which part of the management plan is or was implemented. As part of their engagement, the WCF conducted different environmental education activities: an extracurricular environmental education program at schools (Club P.A.N. program), theater tour, environmental newsletter, and chimpanzee film screenings (WCF 2011, WCF 2012, WCF 2014, WCF 2015). Community consultations revealed that water is key for local agricultural activities, and in collaboration with local communities the WCF started a program to protect three water sources in the area by protecting the habitat around the water sources – but it is not clear whether protection was implemented (WCF 2014, 2015). In 2015, the WCF established a plant nursery with 25,000 plants to be replanted around three water sources (WCF 2015).
Table 4. Conservation activities reported for Sangaredi
Category | Specific activity | Description | Implementing organization(s) | Year of activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
4 Education & awareness | 4.1 Educate local communities about apes and sustainable use | Activities at schools (Club P.A.N. program) and villages (theater, film) (WCF 2011, 2012, 2014, 2015) | 2010-2015 | |
4 Education & awareness | 4.5 Implement multimedia campaigns using theatre, film, print media, discussions | Environmental awareness raising activities include theater, film and newsletters (WCF 2011, 2012, 2014, 2015) | 2010-2015 | |
5 Protection & restoration | 5.6 Habitat restoration | Plant nursery with 25,000 plants (WCF 2015) | 2015 |
Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)
Challenges
Changing ownership of mining companies and volatility of markets for minerals impedes continuous implementation of management plan to mitigate negative impacts of mining operations on chimpanzees (WCF 2015).
Table 5. Challenges reported for Sangaredi
Challenges | Specific challenges | Source | Year(s) |
---|---|---|---|
2 Resources and capacity | 2.3 General lack of funding | WCF 2015 |
Enablers
Table 6. Enablers reported for Sangaredi
Enablers | Specific enablers | Source | Year(s) |
---|---|---|---|
1 Site management | |||
2 Resources and capacity | |||
3 Engaged community | |||
4 Institutional support | |||
5 Ecological context | |||
6 Safety and stability |
Research activities
As detailed above several surveys on chimpanzees have been implemented in Sangaredi (Eriksson & Kpoghomou 2006, Wright et al. 2006, WCF 2012, WCF 2014, WCF 2015). The Pan African Programme (PanAf) ‘The Cultured Chimpanzee’ established a temporary research site in Sangaredi with the aim to record ecological conditions of chimpanzees living in the area and to document chimpanzee behavior (Kühl et al. 2016, Kühl et al. 2019).
Documented behaviours
Table 7. Behaviours documented for Sangaredi
Behavior | Source |
---|---|
Accumulative stone throwing | Kühl et al. 2016 |
Algae fishing | Kühl et al. 2019 |
Ant dipping | Kühl et al. 2019 |
Ant eating | Kühl et al. 2019 |
Making ground nests | Kühl et al. 2019 |
Exposure to climate change impacts
External links
Relevant datasets
References
Environmental Justice Atlas. 2019. Iron Mine on Simandou Mountain Range, Mine de Fer, Guinée, ejatlas.org
Eriksson J, Kpoghomou E. 2006. A rapid survey of the primates of Boké Préfecture, northwestern Guinea. (ed) A Rapid Biological Assessment of Boké Préfecture, Northwestern Guinea. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 41. Conservation International, Washington, DC.
Ham R. 1998 Nationwide chimpanzee census and large mammal survey Republic of Guinea. Projet de conservation des chimpanzés en Guineée. Report to the European Union.
Kühl HS. 2016. Chimpanzee accumulative stone throwing. Scientific Reports 6:22219
Kühl HS et al. 2017. The Critically Endangered western chimpanzee declines by 80%, American Journal of Primatology, 79(9): e22681.
Kühl HS et al. 2019. Human impact erodes chimpanzee behavioral diversity, Science 363, 1453–1455
Sugiyama Y, Soumah AG 1988. Preliminary Survey of the Distribution and Population of Chimpanzees in the Republic of Guinea. Primates, 29(4):569-574
WCF. 2011. Annual report of the activities undertaken by the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation to improve the protection of wild chimpanzees and their habitat in West Africa – Year 2011. Online: Wild Chimpanzee Foundation
WCF. 2012. Annual report 2012 – activities of the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation for improved conservation of chimpanzees and their habitat in West Africa. Online: Wild Chimpanzee Foundation
WCF. 2014. Annual report 2014 – activities of the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation for improved conservation of chimpanzees and their habitat in West Africa. Online: Wild Chimpanzee Foundation
WCF. 2015. Annual report 2015 – activities of the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation for improved conservation of chimpanzees and their habitat in West Africa. Online: Wild Chimpanzee Foundation
Wright HE et al. 2006. A Rapid Biological Assessment of Boké Préfecture, Northwestern Guinea. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 41. Conservation International, Washington, DC.
Page created by: A.P.E.S. Wiki Team & Julia Riedel Date: NA