Difference between revisions of "Malebo"
(Created page with "<!-- INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING SITE INFORMATION - Please consider whether any information you would like to add is sensitive and could be misused to harm apes. Please do no...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | <!-- INSTRUCTIONS FOR | + | <!-- INSTRUCTIONS FOR UPLOADING SITE INFORMATION |
− | + | - Wiki pages contain information in paragraphs, tables, lists, and images. | |
− | - | + | - Text and images are not restricted, and their formats can be chosen as desired. |
− | + | - Tables and lists are extracted as data, so the following restrictions apply to them: | |
− | + | 1) Table structure cannot be changed. | |
− | - Text | + | 2) List format should not change, i.e. they are comma separated lists, not bullet points or numbered lists. |
− | - Tables and | + | 3) To make information comparable across wiki pages, keywords must be taken from the list of permitted words, or added to the list of permitted keywords. This is why we use official lists, e.g., IUCN classification lists, in our tables. |
− | 1) Table structure cannot be changed | ||
− | 2) | ||
− | 3) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
--> | --> | ||
+ | [[Central Africa]] > [[Democratic Republic of the Congo]] > [[Malebo]] | ||
− | + | = Summary = <!-- An overview of the site, with one sentence for each section. May include a site map --> | |
− | + | * Bonobos (''Pan paniscus'') are present in Malebo. | |
− | = Summary = | + | * It has been estimated that 39 (CI: 30-53) individuals occur in the site. |
+ | * The bonobo population trend is unknown. | ||
+ | * The site has a total size of 1044 km². | ||
+ | * Key threats to bonobos are hunting and habitat encroachment. | ||
+ | * Conservation activities have focused on habituation of bonobos for ecotourism, enforcing local taboos about bushmeat, and employing local villagers as bonobo trackers. | ||
− | + | = Site characteristics = <!-- A paragraph summary of physical and geographic aspects of the site, and a table of key information --> | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | The site is located in the Lake Tumba landscape in western Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The region is characterized as a forest-savanna ecosystem, with altitudes ranging from 300 to 700 m (Serckx et al. 2014). The types of forests found at the site include re-colonizing Uapaca sp., old secondary, mixed mature, old growth mono-dominant, riverine gallery and Marantaceae forests (Serckx et al. 2014).The region is also characterized by flood episodes during which water covers ca. 65% of the forest (Inogwabini et al. 2013). | ||
− | + | '''Table 1. Basic site information for Malebo''' | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | '''Table 1 | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="basic-information" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="basic-information" | ||
− | | Area | + | | Area <!-- Please include units: km2/ha e.g 200ha --> |
− | | | + | |1044 km² |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Coordinates | + | |Coordinates |
− | | | + | | -2.588389 S, 16.469250 E |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Designation | + | |Designation |
− | | | + | |Unclassified |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Habitat types | + | |Habitat types <!-- List IUCN Habitat Classification 3.0 categories present (without number), see link below --> |
− | | | + | |Subtropical/tropical moist lowland forest, subtropical/tropical swamp forest, savanna, subtropical/tropical heavily degraded former forest |
|} | |} | ||
− | [ | + | [https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/habitat-classification-scheme IUCN habitat categories] [[Site designations]] |
− | |||
+ | = Ape status = <!--An overview of ape population status (population sizes, trends, etc.), followed by a table of specific surveys and results --> | ||
+ | In 2005, the presence of a bonobo population in the region was documented by the local NGO Mbou-Mon-Tour and by an extensive survey conducted by the WWF (Serckx et al. 2014). In 2007, a habituation program started. The bonobo population seems to be made up of two communities, inhabiting the Nkala and Mpelu forests (Serckx et al. 2014). | ||
− | + | '''Table 2. Ape population estimates in Malebo''' | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | '''Table 2 | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="population-estimate-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="population-estimate-table" | ||
! Species | ! Species | ||
! Year | ! Year | ||
− | ! Abundance estimate (95% | + | ! Abundance estimate (95% CI) |
− | ! Density estimate ( | + | ! Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) |
! Encounter rate (nests/km) | ! Encounter rate (nests/km) | ||
! Area | ! Area | ||
Line 72: | Line 54: | ||
! A.P.E.S. database ID | ! A.P.E.S. database ID | ||
|- | |- | ||
+ | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
+ | |2011-2013 | ||
+ | |39 (30-53) | ||
+ | |0.41 (0.32-0.56) | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |Malebo region (93.84 sq. km) | ||
+ | |Line transects (Distance) | ||
+ | |Sercx et al. 2014 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
+ | |2011 | ||
+ | |31 (15-61) | ||
+ | |0.56 (0.27-1.13) | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |Mpelu forest in Malebo (54.26 sq.km) | ||
+ | |Line transects (Distance) | ||
+ | |Sercx et al. 2014 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
+ | |2012 | ||
+ | |11 (7-19) | ||
+ | |0.21 (0.12-0.35) | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |Mpelu forest in Malebo (54.26 sq.km) | ||
+ | |Line transects (Distance) | ||
+ | |Sercx et al. 2014 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
+ | |2013 | ||
+ | |17 (11-28) | ||
+ | |0.32 (0.19-0.53) | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |Mpelu forest in Malebo (54.26 sq.km) | ||
+ | |Line transects (Distance) | ||
+ | |Sercx et al. 2014 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
+ | |2011 | ||
+ | |20 (12-36) | ||
+ | |0.63 (0.36-1.12) | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |Nkala forest in Malebo (32.45 sq.km) | ||
+ | |Line transects (Distance) | ||
+ | |Sercx et al. 2014 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
+ | |2012 | ||
+ | |16 (11-25) | ||
+ | |0.51 (0.32-0.79) | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |Nkala forest in Malebo (32.45 sq.km) | ||
+ | |Line transects (Distance) | ||
+ | |Sercx et al. 2014 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
+ | |2013 | ||
+ | |17 (9-35) | ||
+ | |0.55 (0.28-1.07) | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |Nkala forest in Malebo (32.45 sq.km) | ||
+ | |Line transects (Distance) | ||
+ | |Sercx et al. 2014 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 86: | Line 134: | ||
= Threats = <!-- a text overview of threats, followed by a table of key threats --> | = Threats = <!-- a text overview of threats, followed by a table of key threats --> | ||
+ | Bonobos are largely respected in the area, and local communities refrain from hunting or eating them, as they believe them to be their ancestors (Inogwabini et al. 2007). However, as other groups and logging companies have moved into the area, this taboo has become degraded; thus, hunting and agricultural expansion now threatens bonobos and other wildlife ([https://www.synchronicityearth.org/partner/mbou-mon-tour/ SynchronicityEarth]). | ||
− | + | '''Table 3. Threats to apes in Malebo''' | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | '''Table 3 | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="threats-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="threats-table" | ||
− | !align="left"|Category | + | !align="left"|Category <!-- PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE THE THREAT CATEGORIES --> |
− | !Specific threats | + | !Specific threats <!-- For specific threats, please use list of comma separated keywords from the IUCN list linked below --> |
− | !Threat level | + | !Threat level <!-- For threat level, please use keywords: low, medium, high, present, absent, unknown--> |
− | !Quantified severity <!-- e.g., encounter | + | !Quantified severity <!-- Enter any available quantification of the threat, e.g., the proportion of the area affected by the threat, hunting sign encounter rates--> |
− | !Description | + | !Description <!-- Add descriptive information --> |
− | !Year of threat | + | !Year of threat <!-- Enter specific year(s), “ongoing”, or “unknown”. If the threat is ongoing, please add the year of reference in parentheses --> |
|- | |- | ||
|1. Residential & commercial development | |1. Residential & commercial development | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 107: | Line 153: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|2. Agriculture & aquaculture | |2. Agriculture & aquaculture | ||
+ | |2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | ||
+ | |Present, but threat severity unknown | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |During a survey conducted between 2011-2013, six villages and twelve farms were directly adjacent to the forest and plantations were located inside the forest (Serckx et al. 2014). | ||
+ | |Ongoing (2014) | ||
+ | |- | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |2.3 Livestock farming & ranching | ||
+ | |Present, but threat severity unknown | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Cattle ranching in parts of the savanna patches (Serckx et al. 2014). |
− | | | + | |Ongoing (2014) |
|- | |- | ||
|3. Energy production & mining | |3. Energy production & mining | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 122: | Line 175: | ||
|4. Transportation & service corridors | |4. Transportation & service corridors | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 128: | Line 181: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|5. Biological resource use | |5. Biological resource use | ||
+ | |5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | ||
+ | |Present, but threat severity unknown | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Hunting has grown since new people and logging companies have moved into the area ([https://www.synchronicityearth.org/partner/mbou-mon-tour/ SynchronicityEarth]). |
− | | | + | |Ongoing |
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | |6. Human | + | |6. Human intrusion & disturbance |
− | |||
| | | | ||
+ | |Unknown | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 143: | Line 196: | ||
|7. Natural system modifications | |7. Natural system modifications | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 150: | Line 203: | ||
|8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | |8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 157: | Line 210: | ||
|9. Pollution | |9. Pollution | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 164: | Line 217: | ||
|10. Geological Events | |10. Geological Events | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Absent |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |11. Climate change & severe weather | + | | 11. Climate change & severe weather |
− | |||
| | | | ||
+ | |Unknown | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 178: | Line 231: | ||
|12. Other options | |12. Other options | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Absent |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 186: | Line 239: | ||
[https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/threat-classification-scheme IUCN Threats list] | [https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/threat-classification-scheme IUCN Threats list] | ||
+ | = Conservation activities = <!-- A summary of the conservation activities, followed by a table of key activities --> | ||
+ | WWF began working on bonobo conservation in the western part of the country in 2005. To protect the bonobos in this natural reserve, WWF has developed an ecotourism initiative called Picbou (Projet Intégré de Conservation des bonobos de l’ouest) since 2006. The project is implemented in collaboration with the local NGO Mbou-Mon-Tour ([https://www.synchronicityearth.org/partner/mbou-mon-tour/ MMT]). Three groups of bonobos have been habituated in the region to learn more about their socio-ecology and develop more effective conservation strategies. Simultaneously, the ecotourism project aims to bring income to the villagers in order to encourage them preserve their natural heritage (WWF 2017). | ||
− | + | '''Table 4. Conservation activities in Malebo''' | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | '''Table 4 | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="conservation-actions-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="conservation-actions-table" | ||
− | !align="left"|Category | + | !align="left"|Category <!-- PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE THE CATEGORIES --> |
− | !Specific activity | + | !Specific activity <!-- For specific threats, please use list from the list linked below, OR enter “Not reported” --> |
− | !Description | + | !Description <!-- Add descriptive information --> |
− | !Year of activity | + | !Year of activity <!-- Add descriptive information --> |
|- | |- | ||
|1. Residential & commercial development | |1. Residential & commercial development | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|2. Agriculture & aquaculture | |2. Agriculture & aquaculture | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|3. Energy production & mining | |3. Energy production & mining | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|4. Transportation & service corridors | |4. Transportation & service corridors | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|5. Biological resource use | |5. Biological resource use | ||
− | | | + | |5.13. Strengthen/support/re-install traditions/taboos that forbid the killing of primates |
− | | | + | |To protect the bonobos, the NGO Mbou-Mon-Tour (MMT) has established an awareness raising programme in local villages to revive the bushmeat taboo ([https://www.synchronicityearth.org/partner/mbou-mon-tour/ SynchronicityEarth]). |
− | | | + | |Ongoing |
|- | |- | ||
− | |6. Human | + | |6. Human intrusion & disturbance |
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|7. Natural system modifications | |7. Natural system modifications | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | |8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|9. Pollution | |9. Pollution | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|10. Education & Awareness | |10. Education & Awareness | ||
− | | | + | |10.2. Involve local community in primate research and conservation management |
− | | | + | |MMT employed local villagers as bonobo trackers ([https://www.synchronicityearth.org/partner/mbou-mon-tour/ SynchronicityEarth]). |
− | | | + | |Ongoing |
|- | |- | ||
|11. Habitat Protection | |11. Habitat Protection | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|12. Species Management | |12. Species Management | ||
− | | | + | |12.1. Habituate primates to human presence to reduce stress from tourists/researchers etc. |
− | | | + | |Three groups of bonobos have been habituated in the region to learn more about their socio-ecology to develop more effective and adapted conservation strategies (WWF 2017). |
− | | | + | |Ongoing |
|- | |- | ||
|13. Livelihood; Economic & Other Incentives | |13. Livelihood; Economic & Other Incentives | ||
− | | | + | |13.4. Run tourist projects and ensure permanent human presence at site |
− | | | + | |WWF has developed an ecotourism initiative named Picbou (Projet Intégré de Conservation des bonobos de l’ouest) since 2006. Picbou is implemented in collaboration with MMT (WWF 2017). |
− | | | + | |Ongoing |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
[[Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)]] | [[Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)]] | ||
+ | = Challenges = <!-- Overview of challenges in ape conservation --> | ||
+ | WWF began working on bonobo conservation in the western part of the country in 2005. To protect the bonobos in this natural reserve, WWF has developed an ecotourism initiative called Picbou (Projet Intégré de Conservation des bonobos de l’ouest) since 2006. The project is implemented in collaboration with the local NGO Mbou-Mon-Tour (MMT). Three groups of bonobos have been habituated in the region to learn more about their socio-ecology and develop more effective conservation strategies. Simultaneously, the ecotourism project aims to bring income to the villagers in order to encourage them preserve their natural heritage ([https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?314614/DRC%2DMalebo%2Dsite%2Dmanaged%2Dby%2DWWF%2Din%2Dthe%2Dtop%2D100%2Dsustainable%2Dtourism%2Ddestinations%2Dof%2D2017%2Din%2Dthe%2DWorld WWF 2017]). | ||
− | + | '''Table 5. Challenges reported for Malebo''' | |
− | + | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="challenges-table" | |
− | + | !align="left"|Challenge <!-- Do not change categories --> | |
− | + | !Source <!-- Source for challenge mentioned --> | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | '''Table 5 | ||
− | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class=" | ||
− | !align="left"| | ||
− | !Source | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
= Research activities = <!-- Overview of research activities --> | = Research activities = <!-- Overview of research activities --> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
===Documented behaviours=== <!-- List of any behaviours observed at the site, including citations --> | ===Documented behaviours=== <!-- List of any behaviours observed at the site, including citations --> | ||
− | '''Table 6 | + | '''Table 6. Ape behaviors reported for Malebo''' |
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="behaviors-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="behaviors-table" | ||
− | !align="left"|Behavior | + | !align="left"|Behavior |
− | !Source | + | !Source |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |Not reported |
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | =External links= | ||
===Relevant datasets=== | ===Relevant datasets=== | ||
[http://apesportal.eva.mpg.de/database/archiveMap A.P.E.S Portal] | [http://apesportal.eva.mpg.de/database/archiveMap A.P.E.S Portal] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
= References = | = References = | ||
− | + | Inogwabini, B. I., Mbende, L., Bakanza, A., & Bokika, J. (2013). Crop damage done by elephants in Malebo Region, Democratic Republic of Congo. Pachyderm, 54, 59-65. <br> | |
+ | Inogwabini, B., Matungila, B., Mbende, L., Abokome, M., & Tshimanga, T. (2007). Great apes in the Lake Tumba landscape, Democratic Republic of Congo: Newly described populations. Oryx, 41(4), 532-538. doi:10.1017/S0030605307414120 <br> | ||
+ | Serckx, A., Huynen, M. C., Bastin, J. F., Hambuckers, A., Beudels-Jamar, R. C., Vimond, M., ... & Kühl, H. S. (2014). Nest grouping patterns of bonobos (Pan paniscus) in relation to fruit availability in a forest-savannah mosaic. PloS one, 9(4), e93742. <br> | ||
+ | WWF. (2017).DRC: Malebo site managed by WWF in the top 100 sustainable tourism destinations of 2017 in the World. Online: https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?314614/DRC%2DMalebo%2Dsite%2Dmanaged%2Dby%2DWWF%2Din%2Dthe%2Dtop%2D100%2Dsustainable%2Dtourism%2Ddestinations%2Dof%2D2017%2Din%2Dthe%2DWorld <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | '''Page completed by:''' | + | '''Page completed by: '''A.P.E.S. Wiki team''' Date:''29/10/2021 <!-- If you don't want to add your name, you can add "A.P.E.S. Wiki team" --> |
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 10:13, 29 October 2021
Central Africa > Democratic Republic of the Congo > Malebo
Summary
- Bonobos (Pan paniscus) are present in Malebo.
- It has been estimated that 39 (CI: 30-53) individuals occur in the site.
- The bonobo population trend is unknown.
- The site has a total size of 1044 km².
- Key threats to bonobos are hunting and habitat encroachment.
- Conservation activities have focused on habituation of bonobos for ecotourism, enforcing local taboos about bushmeat, and employing local villagers as bonobo trackers.
Site characteristics
The site is located in the Lake Tumba landscape in western Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The region is characterized as a forest-savanna ecosystem, with altitudes ranging from 300 to 700 m (Serckx et al. 2014). The types of forests found at the site include re-colonizing Uapaca sp., old secondary, mixed mature, old growth mono-dominant, riverine gallery and Marantaceae forests (Serckx et al. 2014).The region is also characterized by flood episodes during which water covers ca. 65% of the forest (Inogwabini et al. 2013).
Table 1. Basic site information for Malebo
Area | 1044 km² |
Coordinates | -2.588389 S, 16.469250 E |
Designation | Unclassified |
Habitat types | Subtropical/tropical moist lowland forest, subtropical/tropical swamp forest, savanna, subtropical/tropical heavily degraded former forest |
IUCN habitat categories Site designations
Ape status
In 2005, the presence of a bonobo population in the region was documented by the local NGO Mbou-Mon-Tour and by an extensive survey conducted by the WWF (Serckx et al. 2014). In 2007, a habituation program started. The bonobo population seems to be made up of two communities, inhabiting the Nkala and Mpelu forests (Serckx et al. 2014).
Table 2. Ape population estimates in Malebo
Species | Year | Abundance estimate (95% CI) | Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | Encounter rate (nests/km) | Area | Method | Source | Comments | A.P.E.S. database ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pan paniscus | 2011-2013 | 39 (30-53) | 0.41 (0.32-0.56) | Malebo region (93.84 sq. km) | Line transects (Distance) | Sercx et al. 2014 | |||
Pan paniscus | 2011 | 31 (15-61) | 0.56 (0.27-1.13) | Mpelu forest in Malebo (54.26 sq.km) | Line transects (Distance) | Sercx et al. 2014 | |||
Pan paniscus | 2012 | 11 (7-19) | 0.21 (0.12-0.35) | Mpelu forest in Malebo (54.26 sq.km) | Line transects (Distance) | Sercx et al. 2014 | |||
Pan paniscus | 2013 | 17 (11-28) | 0.32 (0.19-0.53) | Mpelu forest in Malebo (54.26 sq.km) | Line transects (Distance) | Sercx et al. 2014 | |||
Pan paniscus | 2011 | 20 (12-36) | 0.63 (0.36-1.12) | Nkala forest in Malebo (32.45 sq.km) | Line transects (Distance) | Sercx et al. 2014 | |||
Pan paniscus | 2012 | 16 (11-25) | 0.51 (0.32-0.79) | Nkala forest in Malebo (32.45 sq.km) | Line transects (Distance) | Sercx et al. 2014 | |||
Pan paniscus | 2013 | 17 (9-35) | 0.55 (0.28-1.07) | Nkala forest in Malebo (32.45 sq.km) | Line transects (Distance) | Sercx et al. 2014 |
Threats
Bonobos are largely respected in the area, and local communities refrain from hunting or eating them, as they believe them to be their ancestors (Inogwabini et al. 2007). However, as other groups and logging companies have moved into the area, this taboo has become degraded; thus, hunting and agricultural expansion now threatens bonobos and other wildlife (SynchronicityEarth).
Table 3. Threats to apes in Malebo
Category | Specific threats | Threat level | Quantified severity | Description | Year of threat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Residential & commercial development | Unknown | ||||
2. Agriculture & aquaculture | 2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | Present, but threat severity unknown | During a survey conducted between 2011-2013, six villages and twelve farms were directly adjacent to the forest and plantations were located inside the forest (Serckx et al. 2014). | Ongoing (2014) | |
2.3 Livestock farming & ranching | Present, but threat severity unknown | Cattle ranching in parts of the savanna patches (Serckx et al. 2014). | Ongoing (2014) | ||
3. Energy production & mining | Unknown | ||||
4. Transportation & service corridors | Unknown | ||||
5. Biological resource use | 5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | Present, but threat severity unknown | Hunting has grown since new people and logging companies have moved into the area (SynchronicityEarth). | Ongoing | |
6. Human intrusion & disturbance | Unknown | ||||
7. Natural system modifications | Unknown | ||||
8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | Unknown | ||||
9. Pollution | Unknown | ||||
10. Geological Events | Absent | ||||
11. Climate change & severe weather | Unknown | ||||
12. Other options | Absent |
Conservation activities
WWF began working on bonobo conservation in the western part of the country in 2005. To protect the bonobos in this natural reserve, WWF has developed an ecotourism initiative called Picbou (Projet Intégré de Conservation des bonobos de l’ouest) since 2006. The project is implemented in collaboration with the local NGO Mbou-Mon-Tour (MMT). Three groups of bonobos have been habituated in the region to learn more about their socio-ecology and develop more effective conservation strategies. Simultaneously, the ecotourism project aims to bring income to the villagers in order to encourage them preserve their natural heritage (WWF 2017).
Table 4. Conservation activities in Malebo
Category | Specific activity | Description | Year of activity |
---|---|---|---|
1. Residential & commercial development | Not reported | ||
2. Agriculture & aquaculture | Not reported | ||
3. Energy production & mining | Not reported | ||
4. Transportation & service corridors | Not reported | ||
5. Biological resource use | 5.13. Strengthen/support/re-install traditions/taboos that forbid the killing of primates | To protect the bonobos, the NGO Mbou-Mon-Tour (MMT) has established an awareness raising programme in local villages to revive the bushmeat taboo (SynchronicityEarth). | Ongoing |
6. Human intrusion & disturbance | Not reported | ||
7. Natural system modifications | Not reported | ||
8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | Not reported | ||
9. Pollution | Not reported | ||
10. Education & Awareness | 10.2. Involve local community in primate research and conservation management | MMT employed local villagers as bonobo trackers (SynchronicityEarth). | Ongoing |
11. Habitat Protection | Not reported | ||
12. Species Management | 12.1. Habituate primates to human presence to reduce stress from tourists/researchers etc. | Three groups of bonobos have been habituated in the region to learn more about their socio-ecology to develop more effective and adapted conservation strategies (WWF 2017). | Ongoing |
13. Livelihood; Economic & Other Incentives | 13.4. Run tourist projects and ensure permanent human presence at site | WWF has developed an ecotourism initiative named Picbou (Projet Intégré de Conservation des bonobos de l’ouest) since 2006. Picbou is implemented in collaboration with MMT (WWF 2017). | Ongoing |
Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)
Challenges
WWF began working on bonobo conservation in the western part of the country in 2005. To protect the bonobos in this natural reserve, WWF has developed an ecotourism initiative called Picbou (Projet Intégré de Conservation des bonobos de l’ouest) since 2006. The project is implemented in collaboration with the local NGO Mbou-Mon-Tour (MMT). Three groups of bonobos have been habituated in the region to learn more about their socio-ecology and develop more effective conservation strategies. Simultaneously, the ecotourism project aims to bring income to the villagers in order to encourage them preserve their natural heritage (WWF 2017).
Table 5. Challenges reported for Malebo
Challenge | Source |
---|---|
Not reported |
Research activities
Documented behaviours
Table 6. Ape behaviors reported for Malebo
Behavior | Source |
---|---|
Not reported |
External links
Relevant datasets
References
Inogwabini, B. I., Mbende, L., Bakanza, A., & Bokika, J. (2013). Crop damage done by elephants in Malebo Region, Democratic Republic of Congo. Pachyderm, 54, 59-65.
Inogwabini, B., Matungila, B., Mbende, L., Abokome, M., & Tshimanga, T. (2007). Great apes in the Lake Tumba landscape, Democratic Republic of Congo: Newly described populations. Oryx, 41(4), 532-538. doi:10.1017/S0030605307414120
Serckx, A., Huynen, M. C., Bastin, J. F., Hambuckers, A., Beudels-Jamar, R. C., Vimond, M., ... & Kühl, H. S. (2014). Nest grouping patterns of bonobos (Pan paniscus) in relation to fruit availability in a forest-savannah mosaic. PloS one, 9(4), e93742.
WWF. (2017).DRC: Malebo site managed by WWF in the top 100 sustainable tourism destinations of 2017 in the World. Online: https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?314614/DRC%2DMalebo%2Dsite%2Dmanaged%2Dby%2DWWF%2Din%2Dthe%2Dtop%2D100%2Dsustainable%2Dtourism%2Ddestinations%2Dof%2D2017%2Din%2Dthe%2DWorld
'Page completed by: A.P.E.S. Wiki team Date:29/10/2021