Difference between revisions of "Zwedru Proposed Protected Area"
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
3) Keywords must be taken from the list of permitted words, or added to the list of permitted keywords. A link to the keyword list page is found adjacent | 3) Keywords must be taken from the list of permitted words, or added to the list of permitted keywords. A link to the keyword list page is found adjacent | ||
to the relevant table or keyword list. This ensures that the same keyword always refers to the same concept, e.g. Everybody uses "Industrial mining", | to the relevant table or keyword list. This ensures that the same keyword always refers to the same concept, e.g. Everybody uses "Industrial mining", | ||
− | rather than several keywords such as "Industrial mining", "Large-scale mining", and "Mining". | + | rather than several keywords such as "Industrial mining", "Large-scale mining", and "Mining". [[File: Map_LBR_Zwedru_PPA_WGS84.png | 400px | thumb| right | Zwedru Proposed Protected Area (Liberia) © A.P.E.S. Wiki Team]] |
--> | --> | ||
<!-- Please add information for this site --> | <!-- Please add information for this site --> | ||
[[West Africa]] > [[Liberia]] > [[Zwedru Proposed Protected Area]] | [[West Africa]] > [[Liberia]] > [[Zwedru Proposed Protected Area]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
= Summary = <!-- An overview of the site, with a one sentence overview of each of the following sections. can include a site map --> | = Summary = <!-- An overview of the site, with a one sentence overview of each of the following sections. can include a site map --> | ||
+ | <div style="float: right"> | ||
+ | {{#display_map: height=200px | width=300px | scrollzoom=off | zoom=5 | layers= OpenStreetMap, OpenTopoMap | ||
+ | |6.32, -8.40~[[Zwedru Proposed Protected Area]]~Western Chimpanzee | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | </div> | ||
− | * Western chimpanzees ( | + | * Western chimpanzees (''Pan troglodytes verus'') are likely to be present in Zwedru Proposed Protected Area. |
* The population size is unknown. | * The population size is unknown. | ||
* The chimpanzee population trend is unknown. | * The chimpanzee population trend is unknown. | ||
Line 25: | Line 28: | ||
= Site characteristics = <!-- A paragraph summary of physical and geographic aspects of the site, and a table of key information --> | = Site characteristics = <!-- A paragraph summary of physical and geographic aspects of the site, and a table of key information --> | ||
− | Zwedru Proposed Protected Area is located 20 km west of the town Zwedru – the capital of Grand Gedeh county - on the northern border between Liberia and Côte D’Ivoire. It has been designated an IBA and a KBA, because it is the only known site where the critically endangered Liberian | + | Zwedru Proposed Protected Area is located 20 km west of the town Zwedru – the capital of Grand Gedeh county - on the northern border between Liberia and Côte D’Ivoire. It has been designated an IBA and a KBA, because it is the only known site where the critically endangered Liberian greenbul, ''Phyllastrephus leucolepis'', has been reported (Johnson 2015). No information about other surveys at this site could be found. During the nationwide survey in 2010-2012 (Tweh et al. 2014), the survey teams found fresh and old chimpanzee nests three kilometres from the border of Zwedru Proposed Protected Area, on the north-western boundary of the site (Junker unpubl. data). |
− | + | '''Table 1. Basic site information for Zwedru Proposed Protected Area''' | |
− | '''Table 1 | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="basic-information" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="basic-information" | ||
|Area <!-- Please include units: km2/ha e.g 200ha --> | |Area <!-- Please include units: km2/ha e.g 200ha --> | ||
Line 34: | Line 36: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Coordinates | |Coordinates | ||
− | |6.32 | + | |6.32, -8.40 |
|- | |- | ||
|Designation <!-- National Park, Nature Reserve, etc. --> | |Designation <!-- National Park, Nature Reserve, etc. --> | ||
Line 43: | Line 45: | ||
|} | |} | ||
[http://www.unitar.org/hiroshima/sites/unitar.org.hiroshima/files/Annex%201%20-%20IUCN%20Classification%20Schemes.pdf IUCN habitat categories] [[Site designations]] | [http://www.unitar.org/hiroshima/sites/unitar.org.hiroshima/files/Annex%201%20-%20IUCN%20Classification%20Schemes.pdf IUCN habitat categories] [[Site designations]] | ||
− | |||
= Ape status = <!-- a text overview of ape status (population sizes, trends etc), followed by a table of specific surveys and results --> | = Ape status = <!-- a text overview of ape status (population sizes, trends etc), followed by a table of specific surveys and results --> | ||
Line 49: | Line 50: | ||
A survey of indicator species was undertaken in 2005 (FFI 2005). This was a collaborative effort of Fauna & Flora International (FFI) the FDA, Environmental Protection Agency of Liberia (EPA) and the Ministry of Planning and Economic Affairs (MPEA). However, no further details on this survey could be found. | A survey of indicator species was undertaken in 2005 (FFI 2005). This was a collaborative effort of Fauna & Flora International (FFI) the FDA, Environmental Protection Agency of Liberia (EPA) and the Ministry of Planning and Economic Affairs (MPEA). However, no further details on this survey could be found. | ||
− | + | '''Table 2. Great ape population estimates in Zwedru Proposed Protected Area''' | |
− | '''Table 2 | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="population-estimate-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="population-estimate-table" | ||
! Species | ! Species | ||
! Year | ! Year | ||
− | ! Abundance estimate (95% | + | ! Abundance estimate (95% CI) |
− | ! Density estimate ( | + | ! Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) |
! Encounter rate (nests/km) | ! Encounter rate (nests/km) | ||
! Area | ! Area | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
The entire proposed protected area is covered by Mineral Exploration Licenses (MEL) for gold, diamonds and other minerals except for iron ore owned by Superior Mineral Resources Inc. (Johnson 2015). MEL’s entail that after a proposed exploration program has been handed to the Minister of Land, Mines, and Energy, the company commences exploration (Wilson et al. 2017). Zwedru Proposed Protected Area overlapped with illegally issued Private-Use Permit (PUP) for commercial logging. Private Use Permits were a type of logging licence designed to allow private land owners to cut trees on their property, but which were reportedly subject to misuse by commercial logging companies. After investigations by Global Witness (Global Witness 2013) much public outcry and extensive media coverage, PUPs have now largely been rescinded (Johnson 2015). Moderate amounts of hunting signs were also recorded on two line transects about 3 km south-west of Zwedru Proposed Protected Area (Junker unpubl. data). | The entire proposed protected area is covered by Mineral Exploration Licenses (MEL) for gold, diamonds and other minerals except for iron ore owned by Superior Mineral Resources Inc. (Johnson 2015). MEL’s entail that after a proposed exploration program has been handed to the Minister of Land, Mines, and Energy, the company commences exploration (Wilson et al. 2017). Zwedru Proposed Protected Area overlapped with illegally issued Private-Use Permit (PUP) for commercial logging. Private Use Permits were a type of logging licence designed to allow private land owners to cut trees on their property, but which were reportedly subject to misuse by commercial logging companies. After investigations by Global Witness (Global Witness 2013) much public outcry and extensive media coverage, PUPs have now largely been rescinded (Johnson 2015). Moderate amounts of hunting signs were also recorded on two line transects about 3 km south-west of Zwedru Proposed Protected Area (Junker unpubl. data). | ||
− | + | '''Table 3. Threats to great apes in Zwedru Proposed Protected Area''' | |
− | '''Table 3 | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="threats-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="threats-table" | ||
!align="left"|Category <!-- Do not change threat categories --> | !align="left"|Category <!-- Do not change threat categories --> | ||
Line 187: | Line 186: | ||
No conservation activities have been reported for the site. | No conservation activities have been reported for the site. | ||
− | + | '''Table 4. Conservation activities in Zwedru Proposed Protected Area''' | |
− | '''Table 4 | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="conservation-actions-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="conservation-actions-table" | ||
!align="left"|Category <!-- Do not change threat categories --> | !align="left"|Category <!-- Do not change threat categories --> | ||
Line 263: | Line 261: | ||
[[Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)]] | [[Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)]] | ||
− | = | + | = Challenges = <!-- Overview of impediments to ape conservation --> |
No information on impediments has been documented. | No information on impediments has been documented. | ||
− | + | '''Table 5. Challenges reported for Zwedru Proposed Protected Area''' | |
− | '''Table 5 | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="impediments-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="impediments-table" | ||
− | !align="left"| | + | !align="left"|Challenge <!-- Do not change categories --> |
!Source <!-- source for impediment mentioned --> | !Source <!-- source for impediment mentioned --> | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 280: | Line 277: | ||
No information on research activities has been documented. | No information on research activities has been documented. | ||
− | |||
===Documented behaviours=== <!-- List of any behaviours observed at the site, including citations --> | ===Documented behaviours=== <!-- List of any behaviours observed at the site, including citations --> | ||
− | + | '''Table 6. Great ape behaviors reported for Zwedru Proposed Protected Area''' | |
− | '''Table 6 | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="behaviors-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="behaviors-table" | ||
!align="left"|Behavior <!-- Do not change categories --> | !align="left"|Behavior <!-- Do not change categories --> | ||
Line 294: | Line 289: | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
= References = | = References = | ||
Line 307: | Line 297: | ||
Wilson STK, Wang H, Kabenge M, Qi X. 2017. The mining sector of Liberia: current practices and environmental challenges. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24: 18711–18720.<br> | Wilson STK, Wang H, Kabenge M, Qi X. 2017. The mining sector of Liberia: current practices and environmental challenges. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24: 18711–18720.<br> | ||
− | |||
'''Page completed by:''' A.P.E.S. Wiki Team '''Date:''' 28/10/2019 <!-- If you don't want to add your name, you can add "A.P.E.S. Wiki team" --> | '''Page completed by:''' A.P.E.S. Wiki Team '''Date:''' 28/10/2019 <!-- If you don't want to add your name, you can add "A.P.E.S. Wiki team" --> | ||
− |
Revision as of 07:12, 27 September 2022
West Africa > Liberia > Zwedru Proposed Protected Area
Summary
- Western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) are likely to be present in Zwedru Proposed Protected Area.
- The population size is unknown.
- The chimpanzee population trend is unknown.
- This site has a total size of 637.15 km².
- Key threats to chimpanzees are hunting, large-scale mining and commercial logging.
- Zwedru Proposed Protected Area has been designated a Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) and an International Bird Area (IBA).
Site characteristics
Zwedru Proposed Protected Area is located 20 km west of the town Zwedru – the capital of Grand Gedeh county - on the northern border between Liberia and Côte D’Ivoire. It has been designated an IBA and a KBA, because it is the only known site where the critically endangered Liberian greenbul, Phyllastrephus leucolepis, has been reported (Johnson 2015). No information about other surveys at this site could be found. During the nationwide survey in 2010-2012 (Tweh et al. 2014), the survey teams found fresh and old chimpanzee nests three kilometres from the border of Zwedru Proposed Protected Area, on the north-western boundary of the site (Junker unpubl. data).
Table 1. Basic site information for Zwedru Proposed Protected Area
Area | 637.15 km² |
Coordinates | 6.32, -8.40 |
Designation | Proposed Protected Area |
Habitat types | Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland Forest |
IUCN habitat categories Site designations
Ape status
A survey of indicator species was undertaken in 2005 (FFI 2005). This was a collaborative effort of Fauna & Flora International (FFI) the FDA, Environmental Protection Agency of Liberia (EPA) and the Ministry of Planning and Economic Affairs (MPEA). However, no further details on this survey could be found.
Table 2. Great ape population estimates in Zwedru Proposed Protected Area
Species | Year | Abundance estimate (95% CI) | Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | Encounter rate (nests/km) | Area | Method | Source | Comments | A.P.E.S. database ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pan troglodytes verus | 2010-2012 | Likely to be present | Zwedru Proposed Protected Area | Model estimate | Junker et al. 2015 (Fig. 6A, Appendix B) | The site itself was not surveyed, estimate based on a nationwide chimpanzee abundance model |
Threats
The entire proposed protected area is covered by Mineral Exploration Licenses (MEL) for gold, diamonds and other minerals except for iron ore owned by Superior Mineral Resources Inc. (Johnson 2015). MEL’s entail that after a proposed exploration program has been handed to the Minister of Land, Mines, and Energy, the company commences exploration (Wilson et al. 2017). Zwedru Proposed Protected Area overlapped with illegally issued Private-Use Permit (PUP) for commercial logging. Private Use Permits were a type of logging licence designed to allow private land owners to cut trees on their property, but which were reportedly subject to misuse by commercial logging companies. After investigations by Global Witness (Global Witness 2013) much public outcry and extensive media coverage, PUPs have now largely been rescinded (Johnson 2015). Moderate amounts of hunting signs were also recorded on two line transects about 3 km south-west of Zwedru Proposed Protected Area (Junker unpubl. data).
Table 3. Threats to great apes in Zwedru Proposed Protected Area
Category | Specific threats | Threat level | Quantified severity | Description | Year of threat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Residential & commercial development | Unknown | ||||
2. Agriculture & aquaculture | Unknown | ||||
3. Energy production & mining | 3.2 Mining & Quarrying | High | Mining for gold, diamonds and other minerals, except for iron ore (Johnson 2015) | Ongoing (2015) | |
4. Transportation & service corridors | Unknown | ||||
5. Biological resource use | 5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | Medium | Hunting signs recorded (Junker unpubl. data) | Ongoing (2011/2012) | |
5.3 Logging and Wood Harvesting | Low | Area overlapped with Private-Use Permits, which have been withdrawn (Global Witness 2013, Johnson 2015) | 2013-2015 | ||
6. Human intrusions & disturbance | Unknown | ||||
7. Natural system modifications | Unknown | ||||
8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | Unknown | ||||
9. Pollution | Unknown | ||||
10. Geological Events | Absent | ||||
11. Climate change & severe weather | Unknown | ||||
12. Other options | Absent |
Conservation activities
No conservation activities have been reported for the site.
Table 4. Conservation activities in Zwedru Proposed Protected Area
Category | Specific activity | Description | Year of activity |
---|---|---|---|
1. Residential & commercial development | Not reported | ||
2. Agriculture & aquaculture | Not reported | ||
3. Energy production & mining | Not reported | ||
4. Transportation & service corridors | Not reported | ||
5. Biological resource use | Not reported | ||
6. Human intrusions & disturbance | Not reported | ||
7. Natural system modifications | Not reported | ||
8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | Not reported | ||
9. Pollution | Not reported | ||
10. Education & Awareness | Not reported | ||
11. Habitat Protection | Not reported | ||
12. Species Management | Not reported | ||
13. Livelihood; Economic & Other Incentives | Not reported |
Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)
Challenges
No information on impediments has been documented.
Table 5. Challenges reported for Zwedru Proposed Protected Area
Challenge | Source |
---|---|
Not reported |
Research activities
No information on research activities has been documented.
Documented behaviours
Table 6. Great ape behaviors reported for Zwedru Proposed Protected Area
Behavior | Source |
---|---|
Not reported |
References
Global Witness. (2013). Avoiding the Riptide: Liberia must Enforce its Forest Laws to Prevent a New Wave of Illegal and Destructive Logging Contracts. Global Witness.
Johnson S. 2015. Aggregated Biodiversity Offsets: A Roadmap for Liberia’s Mining Sector. Unpublished report by the World Bank Group (WBG) and Program On Forests (PROFOR).
Junker J, Boesch C, Freeman T, Mundry R, Stephens C, Kühl HS. 2015. Integrating wildlife conservation with conflicting economic land-use goals in a West African biodiversity hotspot. Basic and Applied Ecology: doi:10.1016/j.baae.2015.07.002.
Tweh C, Lormie M, Kouakou CY, Hillers A, Kühl HS, Junker J, et al. 2014. Conservation status of chimpanzees Pan troglodytes verus and other large mammals in Liberia: a nationwide survey. Oryx: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605313001191.
Wilson STK, Wang H, Kabenge M, Qi X. 2017. The mining sector of Liberia: current practices and environmental challenges. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24: 18711–18720.
Page completed by: A.P.E.S. Wiki Team Date: 28/10/2019