Difference between revisions of "Pic de Fon Classified Forest"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | [[West Africa]] > [[Republic of Guinea]] > [[Pic de Fon Classified Forest]] | |
− | - | + | |
− | - | + | '''[https://wiki-iucnapesportal-org.translate.goog/index.php/Pic_de_Fon_Classified_Forest?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp Français]''' | '''[https://wiki-iucnapesportal-org.translate.goog/index.php/Pic_de_Fon_Classified_Forest?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=pt&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp Português]''' | '''[https://wiki-iucnapesportal-org.translate.goog/index.php/Pic_de_Fon_Classified_Forest?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=es&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp Español]''' | '''[https://wiki-iucnapesportal-org.translate.goog/index.php/Pic_de_Fon_Classified_Forest?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=id&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp Bahasa Indonesia]''' | '''[https://wiki-iucnapesportal-org.translate.goog/index.php/Pic_de_Fon_Classified_Forest?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=ms&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp Melayu]''' |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | __TOC__ | |
− | + | = Summary = | |
− | |||
− | + | <div style="float: right">{{#display_map: height=190px | width=300px | scrollzoom=off | zoom=5 | layers= OpenStreetMap, OpenTopoMap|8.55, -8.88~[[Pic de Fon Classified Forest]]~Pan troglodytes verus}}</div> | |
− | <div style="float: right"> | ||
− | {{#display_map: height= | ||
− | |8.55, -8.88~[[Pic de Fon Classified Forest]]~ | ||
− | }} | ||
− | </div> | ||
* Western chimpanzees (''Pan troglodytes verus'') are present in Pic de Fon Classified Forest. | * Western chimpanzees (''Pan troglodytes verus'') are present in Pic de Fon Classified Forest. | ||
− | * It has been estimated that 75 (CI: 21-246) individuals occur in the forest. | + | * It has been estimated that 75 (CI: 21-246) individuals occur in the forest. |
− | * The chimpanzee population trend is unknown. | + | * The chimpanzee population trend is unknown. |
− | * This site has a total size of 256 km². | + | * This site has a total size of 256 km². |
− | * Key threats to chimpanzees are hunting and habitat degradation due to agricultural activities and fires, as well as exploration for mining. | + | * Key threats to chimpanzees are hunting and habitat degradation due to agricultural activities and fires, as well as exploration for mining. |
* To mitigate negative impacts by proposed mining activities a conservation action plan was written in 2010 but it is unclear which activities were implemented. | * To mitigate negative impacts by proposed mining activities a conservation action plan was written in 2010 but it is unclear which activities were implemented. | ||
− | * Due to its diverse habitat types Pic de Fon is very rich in biodiversity. | + | * Due to its diverse habitat types Pic de Fon is very rich in biodiversity. |
− | = Site characteristics = | + | |
+ | = Site characteristics = | ||
Pic de Fon Classified Forest is located in southern Guinea at the southern end of the Simandou range and is part of the Greater Nimba Highlands. It has a size of 256 km² and was designated a classified forest in 1953 (UNEP-WCMC & IUCN 2019). The altitude of Pic de Fon ranges from 600 to 1,656 m and is the second highest mountain in Guinea (McCullough 2004). As it lies at the transition between forest and savanna zones it features a diversity of habitats including montane grassland and forest (gallery and ravine forests), semi-evergreen lowland forest (primary and secondary), savanna, rivers, and anthropogenic habitat such as plantations (coffee, cocoa, banana), and farmbush (McCullough 2004). This diversity of habitats leads to a diversity of plant and animal species which were surveyed in a rapid biological assessment in 2002. In this assessment 409 plant, 32 amphibian, 12 reptile, 233 bird, 21 bat, 40 katydid (bush crikets), 17 small mammal, 13 primate and 39 large mammal species were recorded, including species new to science and endemic species (McCullough 2004). Regarding primates the following primate species were recorded: western chimpanzee (''Pan troglodytes verus''), potto (''Perodicticus potto''), Demidoff ’s galago (''Galagoides demidoff''), sooty mangabey (''Cercocebus atys atys''), Campbell’s guenon (''Cercopithecus campbelli campbelli''), lesser spot-nosed guenon (''Cercopithecus petaurista buettikoferi''), greater spot-nosed guenon (''Cercopithecus nicitans''), Diana monkey (''Cercopithecus diana diana'', Herbinger & Tounkara 2004). In a conservation priority setting workshop in 2001, Pic de Fon was identified as having important habitat types for amphibians and reptiles (Bakarr et al. 2001). To inform the extension of the protected area network Brugière and Kormos (2009) identified 16 Key Biodiversity Areas across Guinea based on the occurrence of globally threatened large and medium-sized mammals, among which Pic de Fon Classified Forest ranked eight. | Pic de Fon Classified Forest is located in southern Guinea at the southern end of the Simandou range and is part of the Greater Nimba Highlands. It has a size of 256 km² and was designated a classified forest in 1953 (UNEP-WCMC & IUCN 2019). The altitude of Pic de Fon ranges from 600 to 1,656 m and is the second highest mountain in Guinea (McCullough 2004). As it lies at the transition between forest and savanna zones it features a diversity of habitats including montane grassland and forest (gallery and ravine forests), semi-evergreen lowland forest (primary and secondary), savanna, rivers, and anthropogenic habitat such as plantations (coffee, cocoa, banana), and farmbush (McCullough 2004). This diversity of habitats leads to a diversity of plant and animal species which were surveyed in a rapid biological assessment in 2002. In this assessment 409 plant, 32 amphibian, 12 reptile, 233 bird, 21 bat, 40 katydid (bush crikets), 17 small mammal, 13 primate and 39 large mammal species were recorded, including species new to science and endemic species (McCullough 2004). Regarding primates the following primate species were recorded: western chimpanzee (''Pan troglodytes verus''), potto (''Perodicticus potto''), Demidoff ’s galago (''Galagoides demidoff''), sooty mangabey (''Cercocebus atys atys''), Campbell’s guenon (''Cercopithecus campbelli campbelli''), lesser spot-nosed guenon (''Cercopithecus petaurista buettikoferi''), greater spot-nosed guenon (''Cercopithecus nicitans''), Diana monkey (''Cercopithecus diana diana'', Herbinger & Tounkara 2004). In a conservation priority setting workshop in 2001, Pic de Fon was identified as having important habitat types for amphibians and reptiles (Bakarr et al. 2001). To inform the extension of the protected area network Brugière and Kormos (2009) identified 16 Key Biodiversity Areas across Guinea based on the occurrence of globally threatened large and medium-sized mammals, among which Pic de Fon Classified Forest ranked eight. | ||
− | |||
'''Table 1. Basic site information for Pic de Fon Classified Forest''' | '''Table 1. Basic site information for Pic de Fon Classified Forest''' | ||
− | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class=" | + | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Site_characteristics-table" |
− | | Area | + | |Species |
+ | |Pan troglodytes verus | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Area | ||
|256 km² | |256 km² | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Coordinates | + | |Coordinates |
− | | 8.55, -8.88 | + | |Lat: 8.55 , Lon: -8.88 |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |Type of site |
− | |Classified Forest | + | |Protected area (Classified Forest) |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Habitat types | + | |Habitat types |
− | |Subtropical/tropical moist montane forest, | + | |Subtropical/tropical moist montane forest, Subtropical/tropical moist lowland forest, Grassland, Savanna, Wetlands (lakes, rivers, streams, bogs, marshes), Agricultural land |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Type of governance | ||
+ | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
− | = Ape status = | + | [https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/habitat-classification-scheme IUCN habitat categories] [[Site designations]] |
+ | = Ape status = | ||
Rebecca Kormos confirmed the presence of chimpanzees in Pic de Fon based on interviews with hunters (Ham 1998). As part of a rapid biological assessment line transect surveys were conducted by Herbinger and Tounkara (2004) and they estimated the size of the chimpanzee population at around 75 weaned individuals. In 2007 a further survey was implemented as part of the Simandou mining project that estimated the chimpanzee population at between 36-46 individuals, but details are not publicly available (Kormos et al. 2014). | Rebecca Kormos confirmed the presence of chimpanzees in Pic de Fon based on interviews with hunters (Ham 1998). As part of a rapid biological assessment line transect surveys were conducted by Herbinger and Tounkara (2004) and they estimated the size of the chimpanzee population at around 75 weaned individuals. In 2007 a further survey was implemented as part of the Simandou mining project that estimated the chimpanzee population at between 36-46 individuals, but details are not publicly available (Kormos et al. 2014). | ||
− | '''Table 2. Ape population estimates | + | '''Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Pic de Fon Classified Forest''' |
− | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class=" | + | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Ape_status-table" |
− | ! Species | + | !Species |
− | ! Year | + | !Year |
− | ! Abundance estimate (95% CI) | + | !Abundance estimate (95% CI) |
− | ! Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | + | !Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) |
− | ! Encounter rate (nests/km) | + | !Encounter rate (nests/km) |
− | ! Area | + | !Area |
− | ! Method | + | !Method |
− | ! Source | + | !Source |
− | ! Comments | + | !Comments |
− | ! A.P.E.S. database ID | + | !A.P.E.S. database ID |
|- | |- | ||
|''Pan troglodytes verus'' | |''Pan troglodytes verus'' | ||
Line 71: | Line 65: | ||
|Present | |Present | ||
|Pic de Fon | |Pic de Fon | ||
− | | | + | |Interviews |
|Ham 1998 | |Ham 1998 | ||
|Interview of hunters | |Interview of hunters | ||
Line 82: | Line 76: | ||
|6.80 | |6.80 | ||
|Pic de Fon | |Pic de Fon | ||
− | |Line transects | + | |Line transects |
|Herbinger & Tounkara 2004 | |Herbinger & Tounkara 2004 | ||
|Total survey effort: 17.2 km | |Total survey effort: 17.2 km | ||
Line 93: | Line 87: | ||
| | | | ||
|Pic de Fon | |Pic de Fon | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
|Original source unknown, cited in Kormos et al. 2014 | |Original source unknown, cited in Kormos et al. 2014 | ||
Line 99: | Line 93: | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | = Threats = | + | = Threats = |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | A rapid biological assessment in 2002 identified 24 villages in the vicinity of Pic de Fon Classified Forest and concluded that villagers rely strongly on the forest as a source of food (e.g., wildlife, fish, fruits), water, wood for fuel and construction, and medicinal plants (McCullough 2004). Hunting was identified as the biggest threat to chimpanzees and wildlife in general (McCullough 2004). Hunting camps were also found inside the classified forest. 35-40% of the forest are impacted by the cultivation of subsistence and cash crops, including coffee (McCullough 2004). Fires are set intentionally to clear land for agriculture. | ||
− | '''Table 3. Threats to | + | '''Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Pic de Fon Classified Forest''' |
− | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class=" | + | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Threats-table" |
− | ! | + | !Category |
− | !Specific threats | + | !Specific threats |
− | !Threat level | + | !Threat level |
− | + | !Description | |
− | !Description | + | !Year of threat |
− | !Year of threat | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |1 | + | |1 Residential & commercial development |
| | | | ||
|Absent | |Absent | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |2 | + | |2 Agriculture & aquaculture |
|2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | |2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | ||
|High | |High | ||
− | |||
|35-40% of the forest are impacted by agricultural activities (McCullough 2004) | |35-40% of the forest are impacted by agricultural activities (McCullough 2004) | ||
|Ongoing (2004) | |Ongoing (2004) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |2 Agriculture & aquaculture |
|2.3 Livestock farming & ranching | |2.3 Livestock farming & ranching | ||
|High | |High | ||
− | |||
|Cattle herding (Konate pers. Comm. 2023). | |Cattle herding (Konate pers. Comm. 2023). | ||
|Ongoing (2023) | |Ongoing (2023) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |3 | + | |3 Energy production & mining |
|3.2 Mining & quarrying | |3.2 Mining & quarrying | ||
|Medium | |Medium | ||
− | |||
|Exploration for mining since 1997 (Herbinger and Tounkara 2004). Rio Tinto concession area overlaps with the site, and artisanal mining ongoing (Konate pers. Comm. 2023). | |Exploration for mining since 1997 (Herbinger and Tounkara 2004). Rio Tinto concession area overlaps with the site, and artisanal mining ongoing (Konate pers. Comm. 2023). | ||
|Ongoing (2023) | |Ongoing (2023) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |4 | + | |4 Transportation & service corridors |
|4.1 Roads & railroads | |4.1 Roads & railroads | ||
|Medium | |Medium | ||
− | |||
|Roads build for mining exploration (Herbinger and Tounkara 2004) | |Roads build for mining exploration (Herbinger and Tounkara 2004) | ||
|Ongoing (2004) | |Ongoing (2004) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |5 | + | |5 Biological resource use |
|5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | |5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | ||
|High | |High | ||
− | |||
|Identified as the most prevalent threat (Herbinger and Tounkara 2004). Hunting is ongoing (Konate pers. Comm. 2023). | |Identified as the most prevalent threat (Herbinger and Tounkara 2004). Hunting is ongoing (Konate pers. Comm. 2023). | ||
|Ongoing (2023) | |Ongoing (2023) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |5 Biological resource use |
|5.2 Gathering terrestrial plants | |5.2 Gathering terrestrial plants | ||
|Medium | |Medium | ||
− | |||
|Collection of fruits and medicinal plants (McCullough 2004) | |Collection of fruits and medicinal plants (McCullough 2004) | ||
|Ongoing (2004) | |Ongoing (2004) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |5 Biological resource use |
|5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | |5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | ||
|Medium | |Medium | ||
− | |||
|Wood collected for fuel and construction (McCullough 2004) | |Wood collected for fuel and construction (McCullough 2004) | ||
|Ongoing (2004) | |Ongoing (2004) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |6 | + | |6 Human intrusions & disturbance |
| | | | ||
|Absent | |Absent | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |7 | + | |7 Natural system modifications |
|7.1 Fire & fire suppression | |7.1 Fire & fire suppression | ||
|Medium | |Medium | ||
− | |||
|Fire are set for clearing areas for agricultural use (McCullough 2004) | |Fire are set for clearing areas for agricultural use (McCullough 2004) | ||
|Ongoing (2004) | |Ongoing (2004) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |8 | + | |8 Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases |
| | | | ||
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |9 | + | |9 Pollution |
− | |9.6 | + | |9.6 Energy emissions |
|Present | |Present | ||
− | |||
|Noise pollution during mining exploration (Herbinger and Tounkara 2004) | |Noise pollution during mining exploration (Herbinger and Tounkara 2004) | ||
|Unknown (2004) | |Unknown (2004) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |10 | + | |10 Geological events |
| | | | ||
|Absent | |Absent | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |11 | + | |11 Climate change & severe weather |
| | | | ||
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |12 | + | |12 Other threat |
| | | | ||
|Absent | |Absent | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
− | = Conservation activities = | + | [https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/threat-classification-scheme IUCN Threats list] |
+ | = Conservation activities = | ||
− | One outcome of the rapid biological assessment conducted as part of an alliance between Conservation International and Rio Tinto Mining & Exploration in 2002, was an initial biodiversity action plan for Pic de Fon Classified Forest (McCullough 2004). The conservation objectives set out in this plan focus on biodiversity data and monitoring, regulating resource-use, awareness and capacity building, and strengthening the legal protection of the forest (McCullough 2004). However, it is not clear whether any of these activities have | + | One outcome of the rapid biological assessment conducted as part of an alliance between Conservation International and Rio Tinto Mining & Exploration in 2002, was an initial biodiversity action plan for Pic de Fon Classified Forest (McCullough 2004). The conservation objectives set out in this plan focus on biodiversity data and monitoring, regulating resource-use, awareness and capacity building, and strengthening the legal protection of the forest (McCullough 2004). However, it is not clear whether any of these activities have been implemented. |
− | |||
− | '''Table 4. Conservation activities | + | '''Table 4. Conservation activities reported for Pic de Fon Classified Forest''' |
− | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class=" | + | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Conservation_activities-table" |
− | ! | + | !Category |
− | !Specific activity | + | !Specific activity |
− | !Description | + | !Description |
− | !Year of activity | + | !Implementing organization(s) |
+ | !Year of activity | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |1. | + | |1 Development impact mitigation |
− | | | + | |1.8 Use set-aside areas of natural habitat (e.g., mining, logging, agricultural areas) |
+ | |Conservation action plan specifies a zone that should be fully protected (Diakite et al. 2010) | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |2010 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |5 Protection & restoration | ||
+ | |5.2 Legally protect ape habitat | ||
+ | |Designated as Classified Forest in 1953 (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2019) | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |Ongoing (2023) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |5 Protection & restoration |
− | | | + | |5.6 Habitat restoration |
+ | |Planting of trees to create a corridor between Pic de Fon and another forest (Konate pers. Comm. 2023). | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |Ongoing (2023) | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)]] | ||
+ | = Challenges = | ||
+ | |||
+ | The lack of capacity among regional actors, including government agencies, local communities and NGOs has been noted as an impediment, for example to implement law enforcement (McCullough 2004). Civil unrest, and conflict on land tenure were also mentioned as conservation impediments (McCullough 2004). | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Table 5. Challenges reported for Pic de Fon Classified Forest''' | ||
+ | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Challenges-table" | ||
+ | !Challenges | ||
+ | !Specific challenges | ||
+ | !Source | ||
+ | !Year(s) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |2 Resources and capacity | ||
+ | |2.1 Lack of capacity/training | ||
+ | |McCullough 2004 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |6 Safety and stability |
− | | | + | |6.3 Civil unrest/war |
− | | | + | |McCullough 2004 |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
− | |4 | + | |1 Site management |
− | | | + | |1.4 Conflict on land tenure |
+ | |McCullough 2004 | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | = Enablers = | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Table 6. Enablers reported for Pic de Fon Classified Forest''' | ||
+ | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="enabler-table" | ||
+ | !Enablers | ||
+ | !Specific enablers | ||
+ | !Source | ||
+ | !Year(s) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |1 Site management | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |2 Resources and capacity |
− | | | + | | |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |3 Engaged community |
− | | | + | | |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |4 Institutional support |
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |5 Ecological context |
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |6 Safety and stability |
− | |||
| | | | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
|} | |} | ||
− | |||
− | = | + | = Research activities = |
− | + | As detailed above surveys on chimpanzees have been implemented (Ham 1998, Herbinger & Tounkara 2004, Kormos et al. 2014). | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | = | + | = Documented behaviours = |
− | |||
− | |||
− | '''Table | + | '''Table 7. Behaviours documented for Pic de Fon Classified Forest''' |
− | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class=" | + | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="behaviours-table" |
− | ! | + | !Behavior |
− | !Source | + | !Source |
|- | |- | ||
|Not reported | |Not reported | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | = Exposure to climate change impacts = | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | = External links = | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | = Relevant datasets = | ||
Line 349: | Line 329: | ||
= References = | = References = | ||
− | Bakarr M et al. 2001. in IUCN 2008. From forest to the sea: biodiversity connections from Guinea to Togo. Conservation priority setting workshop. Washington D.C., USA: Conservation International | + | Bakarr M et al. 2001. in IUCN 2008. From forest to the sea: biodiversity connections from Guinea to Togo. Conservation priority setting workshop. Washington D.C., USA: Conservation International |
− | Boyes S. 2014. Rio Tinto Simandou: Exporting Iron Mountains. National Geographic. 27 January 2014. [https://blog.nationalgeographic.org/2014/01/27/rio-tinto-simandou-exporting-iron-mountains-part-1-of-2/ blog.nationalgeographic.org] | + | |
− | Brugière D, Kormos R. 2009. Review of the protected area network in Guinea, West Africa, and recommendations for new sites for biodiversity conservation, Biodiversity and Conservation, 18:847 | + | Boyes S. 2014. Rio Tinto Simandou: Exporting Iron Mountains. National Geographic. 27 January 2014. [https://blog.nationalgeographic.org/2014/01/27/rio-tinto-simandou-exporting-iron-mountains-part-1-of-2/ blog.nationalgeographic.org] |
− | Diakite et al. 2010. Plan d’aménagement et plan de gestion de la Forêt Classée du Pic de Fon 2010- 2030. [http://www.thebiodiversityconsultancy.com/es/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Plan-dAmenagement-de-la-Foret-Classee-du-Pic-de-Fon_Version-Approuvee_ResolutionDiminuee-1.pdf www.thebiodiversityconsultancy.com] | + | |
− | Environmental Justice Atlas. 2019. Iron Mine on Simandou Mountain Range, Mine de Fer, Guinée, [https://ejatlas.org/conflict/simandoun-mine ejatlas.org] | + | Brugière D, Kormos R. 2009. Review of the protected area network in Guinea, West Africa, and recommendations for new sites for biodiversity conservation, Biodiversity and Conservation, 18:847 |
− | Ham R. 1998. Nationwide chimpanzee census and large mammal survey Republic of Guinea. Projet de conservation des chimpanzés en Guineée. Report to the European Union. | + | |
− | Herbinger I, Tounkara EO. 2004. A rapid survey of primates in the Simandou Range, Pic de Fon, Guinea, in McCullough (ed) A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Forêt Classée du Pic de Fon, Simandou Range, Southeastern Republic of Guinea. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 35. Conservation International, Washington, DC. | + | Diakite et al. 2010. Plan d’aménagement et plan de gestion de la Forêt Classée du Pic de Fon 2010- 2030. [http://www.thebiodiversityconsultancy.com/es/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Plan-dAmenagement-de-la-Foret-Classee-du-Pic-de-Fon_Version-Approuvee_ResolutionDiminuee-1.pdf www.thebiodiversityconsultancy.com] |
− | Kormos R et al. 2004. Great apes and biodiversity offset projects in Africa: the case for national offset strategies. Plos One 9(11): e111671, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111671 | + | |
− | McCullough J. 2004. A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Forêt Classée du Pic de Fon, Simandou Range, Southeastern Republic of Guinea. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 35. Conservation International, Washington, DC. | + | Environmental Justice Atlas. 2019. Iron Mine on Simandou Mountain Range, Mine de Fer, Guinée, [https://ejatlas.org/conflict/simandoun-mine ejatlas.org] |
− | Rio Tinto. 2018. Rio Tinto update on Simandou. [https://www.riotinto.com/documents/181029_Rio_Tinto_update_on_Simandou.pdf Press release from 29 October 2018] | + | |
− | TBC. 2019. Rio Tinto Simandou, Guinea: Pic de Fon Forêt Classée [https://www.thebiodiversityconsultancy.com/map/simandou-2/ www.thebiodiversityconsultancy.com] | + | Ham R. 1998. Nationwide chimpanzee census and large mammal survey Republic of Guinea. Projet de conservation des chimpanzés en Guineée. Report to the European Union. |
− | UNEP-WCMC, IUCN. 2019. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA), Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN Online: [https://www.protectedplanet.net/29465 www.protectedplanet.net] | + | |
+ | Herbinger I, Tounkara EO. 2004. A rapid survey of primates in the Simandou Range, Pic de Fon, Guinea, in McCullough (ed) A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Forêt Classée du Pic de Fon, Simandou Range, Southeastern Republic of Guinea. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 35. Conservation International, Washington, DC. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Kormos R et al. 2004. Great apes and biodiversity offset projects in Africa: the case for national offset strategies. Plos One 9(11): e111671, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111671 | ||
+ | |||
+ | McCullough J. 2004. A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Forêt Classée du Pic de Fon, Simandou Range, Southeastern Republic of Guinea. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 35. Conservation International, Washington, DC. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Rio Tinto. 2018. Rio Tinto update on Simandou. [https://www.riotinto.com/documents/181029_Rio_Tinto_update_on_Simandou.pdf Press release from 29 October 2018] | ||
+ | |||
+ | TBC. 2019. Rio Tinto Simandou, Guinea: Pic de Fon Forêt Classée [https://www.thebiodiversityconsultancy.com/map/simandou-2/ www.thebiodiversityconsultancy.com] | ||
+ | |||
+ | UNEP-WCMC, IUCN. 2019. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA), Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN Online: [https://www.protectedplanet.net/29465 www.protectedplanet.net] | ||
+ | |||
− | '''Page | + | '''Page created by: '''A.P.E.S. Wiki Team''' Date:''' NA |
− |
Latest revision as of 11:11, 24 January 2025
West Africa > Republic of Guinea > Pic de Fon Classified Forest
Français | Português | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | Melayu
Summary
- Western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) are present in Pic de Fon Classified Forest.
- It has been estimated that 75 (CI: 21-246) individuals occur in the forest.
- The chimpanzee population trend is unknown.
- This site has a total size of 256 km².
- Key threats to chimpanzees are hunting and habitat degradation due to agricultural activities and fires, as well as exploration for mining.
- To mitigate negative impacts by proposed mining activities a conservation action plan was written in 2010 but it is unclear which activities were implemented.
- Due to its diverse habitat types Pic de Fon is very rich in biodiversity.
Site characteristics
Pic de Fon Classified Forest is located in southern Guinea at the southern end of the Simandou range and is part of the Greater Nimba Highlands. It has a size of 256 km² and was designated a classified forest in 1953 (UNEP-WCMC & IUCN 2019). The altitude of Pic de Fon ranges from 600 to 1,656 m and is the second highest mountain in Guinea (McCullough 2004). As it lies at the transition between forest and savanna zones it features a diversity of habitats including montane grassland and forest (gallery and ravine forests), semi-evergreen lowland forest (primary and secondary), savanna, rivers, and anthropogenic habitat such as plantations (coffee, cocoa, banana), and farmbush (McCullough 2004). This diversity of habitats leads to a diversity of plant and animal species which were surveyed in a rapid biological assessment in 2002. In this assessment 409 plant, 32 amphibian, 12 reptile, 233 bird, 21 bat, 40 katydid (bush crikets), 17 small mammal, 13 primate and 39 large mammal species were recorded, including species new to science and endemic species (McCullough 2004). Regarding primates the following primate species were recorded: western chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus), potto (Perodicticus potto), Demidoff ’s galago (Galagoides demidoff), sooty mangabey (Cercocebus atys atys), Campbell’s guenon (Cercopithecus campbelli campbelli), lesser spot-nosed guenon (Cercopithecus petaurista buettikoferi), greater spot-nosed guenon (Cercopithecus nicitans), Diana monkey (Cercopithecus diana diana, Herbinger & Tounkara 2004). In a conservation priority setting workshop in 2001, Pic de Fon was identified as having important habitat types for amphibians and reptiles (Bakarr et al. 2001). To inform the extension of the protected area network Brugière and Kormos (2009) identified 16 Key Biodiversity Areas across Guinea based on the occurrence of globally threatened large and medium-sized mammals, among which Pic de Fon Classified Forest ranked eight.
Table 1. Basic site information for Pic de Fon Classified Forest
Species | Pan troglodytes verus |
Area | 256 km² |
Coordinates | Lat: 8.55 , Lon: -8.88 |
Type of site | Protected area (Classified Forest) |
Habitat types | Subtropical/tropical moist montane forest, Subtropical/tropical moist lowland forest, Grassland, Savanna, Wetlands (lakes, rivers, streams, bogs, marshes), Agricultural land |
Type of governance |
IUCN habitat categories Site designations
Ape status
Rebecca Kormos confirmed the presence of chimpanzees in Pic de Fon based on interviews with hunters (Ham 1998). As part of a rapid biological assessment line transect surveys were conducted by Herbinger and Tounkara (2004) and they estimated the size of the chimpanzee population at around 75 weaned individuals. In 2007 a further survey was implemented as part of the Simandou mining project that estimated the chimpanzee population at between 36-46 individuals, but details are not publicly available (Kormos et al. 2014).
Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Pic de Fon Classified Forest
Species | Year | Abundance estimate (95% CI) | Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | Encounter rate (nests/km) | Area | Method | Source | Comments | A.P.E.S. database ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pan troglodytes verus | 1997 | Present | Pic de Fon | Interviews | Ham 1998 | Interview of hunters | |||
Pan troglodytes verus | 2002 | 75 (21-246) | 0.64 | 6.80 | Pic de Fon | Line transects | Herbinger & Tounkara 2004 | Total survey effort: 17.2 km | |
Pan troglodytes verus | 2007 | 36-46 | Pic de Fon | Unknown | Unknown | Original source unknown, cited in Kormos et al. 2014 |
Threats
A rapid biological assessment in 2002 identified 24 villages in the vicinity of Pic de Fon Classified Forest and concluded that villagers rely strongly on the forest as a source of food (e.g., wildlife, fish, fruits), water, wood for fuel and construction, and medicinal plants (McCullough 2004). Hunting was identified as the biggest threat to chimpanzees and wildlife in general (McCullough 2004). Hunting camps were also found inside the classified forest. 35-40% of the forest are impacted by the cultivation of subsistence and cash crops, including coffee (McCullough 2004). Fires are set intentionally to clear land for agriculture.
Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Pic de Fon Classified Forest
Category | Specific threats | Threat level | Description | Year of threat |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Residential & commercial development | Absent | |||
2 Agriculture & aquaculture | 2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | High | 35-40% of the forest are impacted by agricultural activities (McCullough 2004) | Ongoing (2004) |
2 Agriculture & aquaculture | 2.3 Livestock farming & ranching | High | Cattle herding (Konate pers. Comm. 2023). | Ongoing (2023) |
3 Energy production & mining | 3.2 Mining & quarrying | Medium | Exploration for mining since 1997 (Herbinger and Tounkara 2004). Rio Tinto concession area overlaps with the site, and artisanal mining ongoing (Konate pers. Comm. 2023). | Ongoing (2023) |
4 Transportation & service corridors | 4.1 Roads & railroads | Medium | Roads build for mining exploration (Herbinger and Tounkara 2004) | Ongoing (2004) |
5 Biological resource use | 5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | High | Identified as the most prevalent threat (Herbinger and Tounkara 2004). Hunting is ongoing (Konate pers. Comm. 2023). | Ongoing (2023) |
5 Biological resource use | 5.2 Gathering terrestrial plants | Medium | Collection of fruits and medicinal plants (McCullough 2004) | Ongoing (2004) |
5 Biological resource use | 5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | Medium | Wood collected for fuel and construction (McCullough 2004) | Ongoing (2004) |
6 Human intrusions & disturbance | Absent | |||
7 Natural system modifications | 7.1 Fire & fire suppression | Medium | Fire are set for clearing areas for agricultural use (McCullough 2004) | Ongoing (2004) |
8 Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases | Unknown | |||
9 Pollution | 9.6 Energy emissions | Present | Noise pollution during mining exploration (Herbinger and Tounkara 2004) | Unknown (2004) |
10 Geological events | Absent | |||
11 Climate change & severe weather | Unknown | |||
12 Other threat | Absent |
Conservation activities
One outcome of the rapid biological assessment conducted as part of an alliance between Conservation International and Rio Tinto Mining & Exploration in 2002, was an initial biodiversity action plan for Pic de Fon Classified Forest (McCullough 2004). The conservation objectives set out in this plan focus on biodiversity data and monitoring, regulating resource-use, awareness and capacity building, and strengthening the legal protection of the forest (McCullough 2004). However, it is not clear whether any of these activities have been implemented.
Table 4. Conservation activities reported for Pic de Fon Classified Forest
Category | Specific activity | Description | Implementing organization(s) | Year of activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Development impact mitigation | 1.8 Use set-aside areas of natural habitat (e.g., mining, logging, agricultural areas) | Conservation action plan specifies a zone that should be fully protected (Diakite et al. 2010) | 2010 | |
5 Protection & restoration | 5.2 Legally protect ape habitat | Designated as Classified Forest in 1953 (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2019) | Ongoing (2023) | |
5 Protection & restoration | 5.6 Habitat restoration | Planting of trees to create a corridor between Pic de Fon and another forest (Konate pers. Comm. 2023). | Ongoing (2023) |
Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)
Challenges
The lack of capacity among regional actors, including government agencies, local communities and NGOs has been noted as an impediment, for example to implement law enforcement (McCullough 2004). Civil unrest, and conflict on land tenure were also mentioned as conservation impediments (McCullough 2004).
Table 5. Challenges reported for Pic de Fon Classified Forest
Challenges | Specific challenges | Source | Year(s) |
---|---|---|---|
2 Resources and capacity | 2.1 Lack of capacity/training | McCullough 2004 | |
6 Safety and stability | 6.3 Civil unrest/war | McCullough 2004 | |
1 Site management | 1.4 Conflict on land tenure | McCullough 2004 |
Enablers
Table 6. Enablers reported for Pic de Fon Classified Forest
Enablers | Specific enablers | Source | Year(s) |
---|---|---|---|
1 Site management | |||
2 Resources and capacity | |||
3 Engaged community | |||
4 Institutional support | |||
5 Ecological context | |||
6 Safety and stability |
Research activities
As detailed above surveys on chimpanzees have been implemented (Ham 1998, Herbinger & Tounkara 2004, Kormos et al. 2014).
Documented behaviours
Table 7. Behaviours documented for Pic de Fon Classified Forest
Behavior | Source |
---|---|
Not reported |
Exposure to climate change impacts
External links
Relevant datasets
References
Bakarr M et al. 2001. in IUCN 2008. From forest to the sea: biodiversity connections from Guinea to Togo. Conservation priority setting workshop. Washington D.C., USA: Conservation International
Boyes S. 2014. Rio Tinto Simandou: Exporting Iron Mountains. National Geographic. 27 January 2014. blog.nationalgeographic.org
Brugière D, Kormos R. 2009. Review of the protected area network in Guinea, West Africa, and recommendations for new sites for biodiversity conservation, Biodiversity and Conservation, 18:847
Diakite et al. 2010. Plan d’aménagement et plan de gestion de la Forêt Classée du Pic de Fon 2010- 2030. www.thebiodiversityconsultancy.com
Environmental Justice Atlas. 2019. Iron Mine on Simandou Mountain Range, Mine de Fer, Guinée, ejatlas.org
Ham R. 1998. Nationwide chimpanzee census and large mammal survey Republic of Guinea. Projet de conservation des chimpanzés en Guineée. Report to the European Union.
Herbinger I, Tounkara EO. 2004. A rapid survey of primates in the Simandou Range, Pic de Fon, Guinea, in McCullough (ed) A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Forêt Classée du Pic de Fon, Simandou Range, Southeastern Republic of Guinea. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 35. Conservation International, Washington, DC.
Kormos R et al. 2004. Great apes and biodiversity offset projects in Africa: the case for national offset strategies. Plos One 9(11): e111671, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111671
McCullough J. 2004. A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Forêt Classée du Pic de Fon, Simandou Range, Southeastern Republic of Guinea. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 35. Conservation International, Washington, DC.
Rio Tinto. 2018. Rio Tinto update on Simandou. Press release from 29 October 2018
TBC. 2019. Rio Tinto Simandou, Guinea: Pic de Fon Forêt Classée www.thebiodiversityconsultancy.com
UNEP-WCMC, IUCN. 2019. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA), Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN Online: www.protectedplanet.net
Page created by: A.P.E.S. Wiki Team Date: NA