Difference between revisions of "Malebo"
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
= Summary = | = Summary = | ||
− | <div style="float: right">{{#display_map: height=190px | width=300px | scrollzoom=off | zoom=5 | layers= OpenStreetMap, OpenTopoMap|-2.588389 , 16.469250 ~[[Malebo]]~Pan paniscus}}</div> | + | <div style="float: right">{{#display_map: height=190px | width=300px | scrollzoom=off | zoom=5 | layers= OpenStreetMap, OpenTopoMap|-2.588389, 16.469250~[[Malebo]]~'Pan paniscus''}}</div> |
* Bonobos (''Pan paniscus'') are present in Malebo. | * Bonobos (''Pan paniscus'') are present in Malebo. | ||
* It has been estimated that 39 (CI: 30-53) individuals occur in the site. | * It has been estimated that 39 (CI: 30-53) individuals occur in the site. | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Site_characteristics-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Site_characteristics-table" | ||
|Species | |Species | ||
− | |Pan paniscus | + | |'Pan paniscus'' |
|- | |- | ||
|Area | |Area | ||
− | | | + | |1,044 km² |
|- | |- | ||
|Coordinates | |Coordinates | ||
− | |Lat: -2.588389 | + | |Lat: -2.588389 , Lon: 16.469250 |
|- | |- | ||
|Type of site | |Type of site | ||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
!Species | !Species | ||
!Year | !Year | ||
+ | !Occurrence | ||
+ | !Encounter or vistation rate (nests/km; ind/day) | ||
+ | !Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | ||
!Abundance estimate (95% CI) | !Abundance estimate (95% CI) | ||
− | ! | + | !Survey area |
− | ! | + | !Sampling method |
− | ! | + | !Analytical framework |
− | |||
!Source | !Source | ||
!Comments | !Comments | ||
Line 60: | Line 62: | ||
|''Pan paniscus'' | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
|2011-2013 | |2011-2013 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |0.41 (0.32-0.56) | ||
|39 (30-53) | |39 (30-53) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|Malebo region (93.84 sq. km) | |Malebo region (93.84 sq. km) | ||
|Line transects | |Line transects | ||
+ | | | ||
|Sercx et al. 2014 | |Sercx et al. 2014 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 71: | Line 75: | ||
|''Pan paniscus'' | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
|2011 | |2011 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |0.56 (0.27-1.13) | ||
|31 (15-61) | |31 (15-61) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|Mpelu forest in Malebo (54.26 sq.km) | |Mpelu forest in Malebo (54.26 sq.km) | ||
|Line transects | |Line transects | ||
+ | | | ||
|Sercx et al. 2014 | |Sercx et al. 2014 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 82: | Line 88: | ||
|''Pan paniscus'' | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
|2012 | |2012 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |0.21 (0.12-0.35) | ||
|11 (7-19) | |11 (7-19) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|Mpelu forest in Malebo (54.26 sq.km) | |Mpelu forest in Malebo (54.26 sq.km) | ||
|Line transects | |Line transects | ||
+ | | | ||
|Sercx et al. 2014 | |Sercx et al. 2014 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 93: | Line 101: | ||
|''Pan paniscus'' | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
|2013 | |2013 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |0.32 (0.19-0.53) | ||
|17 (11-28) | |17 (11-28) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|Mpelu forest in Malebo (54.26 sq.km) | |Mpelu forest in Malebo (54.26 sq.km) | ||
|Line transects | |Line transects | ||
+ | | | ||
|Sercx et al. 2014 | |Sercx et al. 2014 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 104: | Line 114: | ||
|''Pan paniscus'' | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
|2011 | |2011 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |0.63 (0.36-1.12) | ||
|20 (12-36) | |20 (12-36) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|Nkala forest in Malebo (32.45 sq.km) | |Nkala forest in Malebo (32.45 sq.km) | ||
|Line transects | |Line transects | ||
+ | | | ||
|Sercx et al. 2014 | |Sercx et al. 2014 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 115: | Line 127: | ||
|''Pan paniscus'' | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
|2012 | |2012 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |0.51 (0.32-0.79) | ||
|16 (11-25) | |16 (11-25) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|Nkala forest in Malebo (32.45 sq.km) | |Nkala forest in Malebo (32.45 sq.km) | ||
|Line transects | |Line transects | ||
+ | | | ||
|Sercx et al. 2014 | |Sercx et al. 2014 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 126: | Line 140: | ||
|''Pan paniscus'' | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
|2013 | |2013 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |0.55 (0.28-1.07) | ||
|17 (9-35) | |17 (9-35) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|Nkala forest in Malebo (32.45 sq.km) | |Nkala forest in Malebo (32.45 sq.km) | ||
|Line transects | |Line transects | ||
+ | | | ||
|Sercx et al. 2014 | |Sercx et al. 2014 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 148: | Line 164: | ||
!Year of threat | !Year of threat | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |10 Geological events |
+ | | | ||
+ | |Absent | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |12 Other threat | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Absent |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 156: | Line 178: | ||
|2 Agriculture & aquaculture | |2 Agriculture & aquaculture | ||
|2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | |2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | ||
− | |Present | + | |Present (unknown severity) |
|During a survey conducted between 2011-2013, six villages and twelve farms were directly adjacent to the forest and plantations were located inside the forest (Serckx et al. 2014). | |During a survey conducted between 2011-2013, six villages and twelve farms were directly adjacent to the forest and plantations were located inside the forest (Serckx et al. 2014). | ||
|Ongoing (2014) | |Ongoing (2014) | ||
Line 162: | Line 184: | ||
|2 Agriculture & aquaculture | |2 Agriculture & aquaculture | ||
|2.3 Livestock farming & ranching | |2.3 Livestock farming & ranching | ||
− | |Present | + | |Present (unknown severity) |
|Cattle ranching in parts of the savanna patches (Serckx et al. 2014). | |Cattle ranching in parts of the savanna patches (Serckx et al. 2014). | ||
|Ongoing (2014) | |Ongoing (2014) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |5 Biological resource use | ||
+ | |5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | ||
+ | |Present (unknown severity) | ||
+ | |Hunting has grown since new people and logging companies have moved into the area ([https://www.synchronicityearth.org/partner/mbou-mon-tour/ SynchronicityEarth]). | ||
+ | |Ongoing | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |1 Residential & commercial development | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |Unknown | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|3 Energy production & mining | |3 Energy production & mining | ||
Line 177: | Line 211: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
|6 Human intrusions & disturbance | |6 Human intrusions & disturbance | ||
Line 205: | Line 233: | ||
| | | | ||
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 217: | Line 239: | ||
| | | | ||
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | |
Latest revision as of 09:16, 18 March 2025
Central Africa > Democratic Republic of the Congo > Malebo
Français | Português | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | Melayu
Summary
- Bonobos (Pan paniscus) are present in Malebo.
- It has been estimated that 39 (CI: 30-53) individuals occur in the site.
- The bonobo population trend is unknown.
- The site has a total size of 1044 km².
- Key threats to bonobos are hunting and habitat encroachment.
- Conservation activities have focused on habituation of bonobos for ecotourism, enforcing local taboos about bushmeat, and employing local villagers as bonobo trackers.
Site characteristics
The site is located in the Lake Tumba landscape in western Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The region is characterized as a forest-savanna ecosystem, with altitudes ranging from 300 to 700 m (Serckx et al. 2014). The types of forests found at the site include re-colonizing Uapaca sp., old secondary, mixed mature, old growth mono-dominant, riverine gallery and Marantaceae forests (Serckx et al. 2014).The region is also characterized by flood episodes during which water covers ca. 65% of the forest (Inogwabini et al. 2013).
Table 1. Basic site information for Malebo
Species | 'Pan paniscus |
Area | 1,044 km² |
Coordinates | Lat: -2.588389 , Lon: 16.469250 |
Type of site | Non-protected area |
Habitat types | Subtropical/tropical moist lowland forest, Subtropical/tropical swamp forest, Savanna, Subtropical/tropical heavily degraded former forest |
Type of governance |
IUCN habitat categories Site designations
Ape status
In 2005, the presence of a bonobo population in the region was documented by the local NGO Mbou-Mon-Tour and by an extensive survey conducted by the WWF (Serckx et al. 2014). In 2007, a habituation program started. The bonobo population seems to be made up of two communities, inhabiting the Nkala and Mpelu forests (Serckx et al. 2014).
Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Malebo
Species | Year | Occurrence | Encounter or vistation rate (nests/km; ind/day) | Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | Abundance estimate (95% CI) | Survey area | Sampling method | Analytical framework | Source | Comments | A.P.E.S. database ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pan paniscus | 2011-2013 | 0.41 (0.32-0.56) | 39 (30-53) | Malebo region (93.84 sq. km) | Line transects | Sercx et al. 2014 | |||||
Pan paniscus | 2011 | 0.56 (0.27-1.13) | 31 (15-61) | Mpelu forest in Malebo (54.26 sq.km) | Line transects | Sercx et al. 2014 | |||||
Pan paniscus | 2012 | 0.21 (0.12-0.35) | 11 (7-19) | Mpelu forest in Malebo (54.26 sq.km) | Line transects | Sercx et al. 2014 | |||||
Pan paniscus | 2013 | 0.32 (0.19-0.53) | 17 (11-28) | Mpelu forest in Malebo (54.26 sq.km) | Line transects | Sercx et al. 2014 | |||||
Pan paniscus | 2011 | 0.63 (0.36-1.12) | 20 (12-36) | Nkala forest in Malebo (32.45 sq.km) | Line transects | Sercx et al. 2014 | |||||
Pan paniscus | 2012 | 0.51 (0.32-0.79) | 16 (11-25) | Nkala forest in Malebo (32.45 sq.km) | Line transects | Sercx et al. 2014 | |||||
Pan paniscus | 2013 | 0.55 (0.28-1.07) | 17 (9-35) | Nkala forest in Malebo (32.45 sq.km) | Line transects | Sercx et al. 2014 |
Threats
Bonobos are largely respected in the area, and local communities refrain from hunting or eating them, as they believe them to be their ancestors (Inogwabini et al. 2007). However, as other groups and logging companies have moved into the area, this taboo has become degraded; thus, hunting and agricultural expansion now threatens bonobos and other wildlife (SynchronicityEarth).
Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Malebo
Category | Specific threats | Threat level | Description | Year of threat |
---|---|---|---|---|
10 Geological events | Absent | |||
12 Other threat | Absent | |||
2 Agriculture & aquaculture | 2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | Present (unknown severity) | During a survey conducted between 2011-2013, six villages and twelve farms were directly adjacent to the forest and plantations were located inside the forest (Serckx et al. 2014). | Ongoing (2014) |
2 Agriculture & aquaculture | 2.3 Livestock farming & ranching | Present (unknown severity) | Cattle ranching in parts of the savanna patches (Serckx et al. 2014). | Ongoing (2014) |
5 Biological resource use | 5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | Present (unknown severity) | Hunting has grown since new people and logging companies have moved into the area (SynchronicityEarth). | Ongoing |
1 Residential & commercial development | Unknown | |||
3 Energy production & mining | Unknown | |||
4 Transportation & service corridors | Unknown | |||
6 Human intrusions & disturbance | Unknown | |||
7 Natural system modifications | Unknown | |||
8 Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases | Unknown | |||
9 Pollution | Unknown | |||
11 Climate change & severe weather | Unknown |
Conservation activities
WWF began working on bonobo conservation in the western part of the country in 2005. To protect the bonobos in this natural reserve, WWF has developed an ecotourism initiative called Picbou (Projet Intégré de Conservation des bonobos de l’ouest) since 2006. The project is implemented in collaboration with the local NGO Mbou-Mon-Tour (MMT). Three groups of bonobos have been habituated in the region to learn more about their socio-ecology and develop more effective conservation strategies. Simultaneously, the ecotourism project aims to bring income to the villagers in order to encourage them preserve their natural heritage (WWF 2017).
Table 4. Conservation activities reported for Malebo
Category | Specific activity | Description | Implementing organization(s) | Year of activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
2 Counter-wildlife crime | 2.9 Strengthen/support/re-install traditions/taboos that forbid the killing of primates | To protect the bonobos, the NGO Mbou-Mon-Tour (MMT) has established an awareness raising programme in local villages to revive the bushmeat taboo (SynchronicityEarth). | Ongoing | |
4 Education & awareness | 4.2 Involve local community in ape research and conservation management | MMT employed local villagers as bonobo trackers (SynchronicityEarth). | Ongoing | |
6 Species management | 6.1 Habituate primates to human presence to reduce stress from tourists/researchers | Three groups of bonobos have been habituated in the region to learn more about their socio-ecology to develop more effective and adapted conservation strategies (WWF 2017). | Ongoing | |
8 Permanent presence | 8.2 Run tourist projects and ensure permanent human presence at site | WWF has developed an ecotourism initiative named Picbou (Projet Intégré de Conservation des bonobos de l’ouest) since 2006. Picbou is implemented in collaboration with MMT (WWF 2017). | Ongoing |
Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)
Challenges
WWF began working on bonobo conservation in the western part of the country in 2005. To protect the bonobos in this natural reserve, WWF has developed an ecotourism initiative called Picbou (Projet Intégré de Conservation des bonobos de l’ouest) since 2006. The project is implemented in collaboration with the local NGO Mbou-Mon-Tour (MMT). Three groups of bonobos have been habituated in the region to learn more about their socio-ecology and develop more effective conservation strategies. Simultaneously, the ecotourism project aims to bring income to the villagers in order to encourage them preserve their natural heritage (WWF 2017).
Table 5. Challenges reported for Malebo
Challenges | Specific challenges | Source | Year(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Not reported |
Enablers
Table 6. Enablers reported for Malebo
Enablers | Specific enablers | Source | Year(s) |
---|---|---|---|
1 Site management | |||
2 Resources and capacity | |||
3 Engaged community | |||
4 Institutional support | |||
5 Ecological context | |||
6 Safety and stability |
Research activities
Documented behaviours
Table 7. Behaviours documented for Malebo
Behavior | Source |
---|---|
Not reported |
Exposure to climate change impacts
External links
Relevant datasets
References
Inogwabini, B. I., Mbende, L., Bakanza, A., & Bokika, J. (2013). Crop damage done by elephants in Malebo Region, Democratic Republic of Congo. Pachyderm, 54, 59-65.
Inogwabini, B., Matungila, B., Mbende, L., Abokome, M., & Tshimanga, T. (2007). Great apes in the Lake Tumba landscape, Democratic Republic of Congo: Newly described populations. Oryx, 41(4), 532-538. doi:10.1017/S0030605307414120
Serckx, A., Huynen, M. C., Bastin, J. F., Hambuckers, A., Beudels-Jamar, R. C., Vimond, M., ... & Kühl, H. S. (2014). Nest grouping patterns of bonobos (Pan paniscus) in relation to fruit availability in a forest-savannah mosaic. PloS one, 9(4), e93742.
WWF. (2017).DRC: Malebo site managed by WWF in the top 100 sustainable tourism destinations of 2017 in the World. Online: https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?314614/DRC%2DMalebo%2Dsite%2Dmanaged%2Dby%2DWWF%2Din%2Dthe%2Dtop%2D100%2Dsustainable%2Dtourism%2Ddestinations%2Dof%2D2017%2Din%2Dthe%2DWorld
Page created by: A.P.E.S. Wiki team Date: NA