Difference between revisions of "Western block (Lac Tumba-Lac Mai Ndombe)"
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
= Summary = | = Summary = | ||
− | <div style="float: right">{{#display_map: height=190px | width=300px | scrollzoom=off | zoom=5 | layers= OpenStreetMap, OpenTopoMap|-1.487097, 17.250945~[[Western block (Lac Tumba-Lac Mai Ndombe)]]~Pan paniscus}}</div> | + | <div style="float: right">{{#display_map: height=190px | width=300px | scrollzoom=off | zoom=5 | layers= OpenStreetMap, OpenTopoMap|-1.487097, 17.250945~[[Western block (Lac Tumba-Lac Mai Ndombe)]]~'Pan paniscus''}}</div> |
* Bonobos (''Pan paniscus'') are present in Western block (Lac Tumba-Lac Mai Ndombe). | * Bonobos (''Pan paniscus'') are present in Western block (Lac Tumba-Lac Mai Ndombe). | ||
* It has been estimated that up to 5,000 individuals occur in the site. | * It has been estimated that up to 5,000 individuals occur in the site. | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Site_characteristics-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Site_characteristics-table" | ||
|Species | |Species | ||
− | |Pan paniscus | + | |'Pan paniscus'' |
|- | |- | ||
|Area | |Area | ||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
!Species | !Species | ||
!Year | !Year | ||
+ | !Occurrence | ||
+ | !Encounter or vistation rate (nests/km; ind/day) | ||
+ | !Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | ||
!Abundance estimate (95% CI) | !Abundance estimate (95% CI) | ||
− | ! | + | !Survey area |
− | ! | + | !Sampling method |
− | ! | + | !Analytical framework |
− | |||
!Source | !Source | ||
!Comments | !Comments | ||
Line 60: | Line 62: | ||
|''Pan paniscus'' | |''Pan paniscus'' | ||
|2003-2010 | |2003-2010 | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |5000 | ||
|Western block (Lac Tumba-Lac Mai Ndombe) | |Western block (Lac Tumba-Lac Mai Ndombe) | ||
|Other | |Other | ||
+ | | | ||
|[https://www.iucngreatapes.org/bonobo IUCN & ICCN 2012] | |[https://www.iucngreatapes.org/bonobo IUCN & ICCN 2012] | ||
|estimate is a maxiumum | |estimate is a maxiumum | ||
Line 82: | Line 86: | ||
!Year of threat | !Year of threat | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |10 Geological events |
+ | | | ||
+ | |Absent | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |12 Other threat | ||
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Absent |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 90: | Line 100: | ||
|2 Agriculture & aquaculture | |2 Agriculture & aquaculture | ||
|2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | |2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | ||
− | |High | + | |High (more than 70% of population affected) |
|Agricultural activities leading to habitat destruction (IUCN & ICCN 2012). | |Agricultural activities leading to habitat destruction (IUCN & ICCN 2012). | ||
|Ongoing (2012) | |Ongoing (2012) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
|5 Biological resource use | |5 Biological resource use | ||
|5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | |5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | ||
− | |High | + | |High (more than 70% of population affected) |
|Commercial poaching to supply urban bushmeat markets is intense, as the markets in Mbandaka, Kinshasa and Brazzaville are accessible through the Congo River (IUCN & ICCN 2012). | |Commercial poaching to supply urban bushmeat markets is intense, as the markets in Mbandaka, Kinshasa and Brazzaville are accessible through the Congo River (IUCN & ICCN 2012). | ||
|Ongoing (2012) | |Ongoing (2012) | ||
Line 114: | Line 112: | ||
|5 Biological resource use | |5 Biological resource use | ||
|5.2 Gathering terrestrial plants | |5.2 Gathering terrestrial plants | ||
− | |High | + | |High (more than 70% of population affected) |
|Collection of NFTPs (IUCN & ICCN 2012). | |Collection of NFTPs (IUCN & ICCN 2012). | ||
|Ongoing (2012) | |Ongoing (2012) | ||
Line 120: | Line 118: | ||
|5 Biological resource use | |5 Biological resource use | ||
|5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | |5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | ||
− | |High | + | |High (more than 70% of population affected) |
|Logging concessions, located largely in the south, cover approximately 40% of the landscape; terra firma forests are mainly old secondary forests that have been logged in the past (IUCN & ICCN 2012). | |Logging concessions, located largely in the south, cover approximately 40% of the landscape; terra firma forests are mainly old secondary forests that have been logged in the past (IUCN & ICCN 2012). | ||
|Ongoing (2012) | |Ongoing (2012) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |1 Residential & commercial development |
+ | | | ||
+ | |Unknown | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |3 Energy production & mining | ||
| | | | ||
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
Line 130: | Line 134: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |4 Transportation & service corridors |
| | | | ||
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
Line 136: | Line 140: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |6 Human intrusions & disturbance |
| | | | ||
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
Line 142: | Line 146: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |7 Natural system modifications |
| | | | ||
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
Line 148: | Line 152: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |8 Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases |
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |9 Pollution |
| | | | ||
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
Line 160: | Line 164: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |11 Climate change & severe weather |
| | | | ||
− | | | + | |Unknown |
| | | | ||
| | | |
Revision as of 09:18, 18 March 2025
Central Africa > Democratic Republic of the Congo > Western block (Lac Tumba-Lac Mai Ndombe)
Français | Português | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | Melayu
Summary
- Bonobos (Pan paniscus) are present in Western block (Lac Tumba-Lac Mai Ndombe).
- It has been estimated that up to 5,000 individuals occur in the site.
- The population trend is unknown.
- The site has a total size of 72,000 km².
- Key threats to bonobos are poaching, habitat destruction and degradation, risk of disease transmission.
- Conservation activities have focused on land-use planning.
Site characteristics
The block corresponds to the DRC sector of the Congo Basin Forest Partnership and the Commission des Forêts d’Afrique Centrale Lac Télé-Lac Tumba transboundary landscape (IUCN & ICCN 2012). The area extends over more than 72,000 km² and includes the Tumba and Mai Ndombe lakes. Swamp forests and seasonally-flooded forests cover 60–65% of the area, while the southern parts of the landscape are covered with savanna-forest mosaic (IUCN & ICCN 2012). The wetland is part of a transboundary Ramsar agreement with the Republic of Congo; the DRC sector (65,700 km²) is the largest Ramsar site in the world (IUCN & ICCN 2012).
Table 1. Basic site information for Western block (Lac Tumba-Lac Mai Ndombe)
Species | 'Pan paniscus |
Area | 72,000 km² |
Coordinates | Lat: -1.487097 , Lon: 17.250945 |
Type of site | Non-protected area |
Habitat types | Subtropical/tropical moist lowland forest, Subtropical/tropical swamp forest, Savanna, Wetlands (lakes, rivers, streams, bogs, marshes) |
Type of governance |
IUCN habitat categories Site designations
Ape status
The block corresponds to the DRC sector of the Congo Basin Forest Partnership and the Commission des Forêts d’Afrique Centrale Lac Télé-Lac Tumba transboundary landscape (IUCN & ICCN 2012). The area extends over more than 72,000 km² and includes the Tumba and Mai Ndombe lakes. Swamp forests and seasonally-flooded forests cover 60–65% of the area, while the southern parts of the landscape are covered with savanna-forest mosaic (IUCN & ICCN 2012). The wetland is part of a transboundary Ramsar agreement with the Republic of Congo; the DRC sector (65,700 km²) is the largest Ramsar site in the world (IUCN & ICCN 2012).
Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Western block (Lac Tumba-Lac Mai Ndombe)
Species | Year | Occurrence | Encounter or vistation rate (nests/km; ind/day) | Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | Abundance estimate (95% CI) | Survey area | Sampling method | Analytical framework | Source | Comments | A.P.E.S. database ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pan paniscus | 2003-2010 | 5000 | Western block (Lac Tumba-Lac Mai Ndombe) | Other | IUCN & ICCN 2012 | estimate is a maxiumum |
Threats
The main threats to bonobos in the block include poaching, habitat loss due and fragmentation, and the potential for disease transmission (IUCN & ICCN 2012).
Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Western block (Lac Tumba-Lac Mai Ndombe)
Category | Specific threats | Threat level | Description | Year of threat |
---|---|---|---|---|
10 Geological events | Absent | |||
12 Other threat | Absent | |||
2 Agriculture & aquaculture | 2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Agricultural activities leading to habitat destruction (IUCN & ICCN 2012). | Ongoing (2012) |
5 Biological resource use | 5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Commercial poaching to supply urban bushmeat markets is intense, as the markets in Mbandaka, Kinshasa and Brazzaville are accessible through the Congo River (IUCN & ICCN 2012). | Ongoing (2012) |
5 Biological resource use | 5.2 Gathering terrestrial plants | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Collection of NFTPs (IUCN & ICCN 2012). | Ongoing (2012) |
5 Biological resource use | 5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Logging concessions, located largely in the south, cover approximately 40% of the landscape; terra firma forests are mainly old secondary forests that have been logged in the past (IUCN & ICCN 2012). | Ongoing (2012) |
1 Residential & commercial development | Unknown | |||
3 Energy production & mining | Unknown | |||
4 Transportation & service corridors | Unknown | |||
6 Human intrusions & disturbance | Unknown | |||
7 Natural system modifications | Unknown | |||
8 Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases | Unknown | |||
9 Pollution | Unknown | |||
11 Climate change & severe weather | Unknown |
Conservation activities
Within the framework of the CARPE programme, a land-use plan is being developed, which includes three protected areas, 13 community-based natural resource management areas and six resource extraction zones. The proposed protected areas are Tumba-Lediima Natural Reserve (7,500 km²), Ngiri Biosphere Reserve (524 km², created in January 2011), with no bonobos but a small population of chimpanzees (being located on the right bank of the Congo River), and Mabali Scientific Reserve (2.6 km²) (IUCN & ICCN 2012).
Challenges
Table 5. Challenges reported for Western block (Lac Tumba-Lac Mai Ndombe)
Challenges | Specific challenges | Source | Year(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Not reported |
Enablers
Table 6. Enablers reported for Western block (Lac Tumba-Lac Mai Ndombe)
Enablers | Specific enablers | Source | Year(s) |
---|---|---|---|
1 Site management | |||
2 Resources and capacity | |||
3 Engaged community | |||
4 Institutional support | |||
5 Ecological context | |||
6 Safety and stability |
Research activities
Documented behaviours
Table 7. Behaviours documented for Western block (Lac Tumba-Lac Mai Ndombe)
Behavior | Source |
---|---|
Not reported |
Exposure to climate change impacts
External links
Relevant datasets
References
Inogwabini, B.-I., Matungila, B., Mbende, L., Abokome, M. & wa Tshimanga, T. (2007). Great apes in the Lake Tumba landscape, Democratic Republic of Congo: newly described populations. Oryx 41: 532–538.
Inogwabini, B.-I., Bewa, M., Longwango, M., Abokome, M. & Vuvu, M. (2008). The bonobos of the Lake Tumba – Lake Maindombe hinterland: threats and opportunities for population conservation. In: The Bonobos: Behaviour, Ecology & Conservation. T. Furuichi & J. Thompson (eds.). Springer, New York, pp. 273–290.
IUCN & ICCN (2012). Bonobo (Pan paniscus): Conservation Strategy 2012–2022. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group & Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature. 65 pp. Online: https://www.iucngreatapes.org/bonobo
Page created by: A.P.E.S. Wiki team Date: NA