Difference between revisions of "Outamba-Kilimi National Park"
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
= Summary = | = Summary = | ||
− | <div style="float: right">{{#display_map: height=190px | width=300px | scrollzoom=off | zoom=5 | layers= OpenStreetMap, OpenTopoMap|9.73, -12.07~[[Outamba-Kilimi National Park]]~Pan troglodytes verus}}</div> | + | <div style="float: right">{{#display_map: height=190px | width=300px | scrollzoom=off | zoom=5 | layers= OpenStreetMap, OpenTopoMap|9.73, -12.07~[[Outamba-Kilimi National Park]]~'Pan troglodytes verus''}}</div> |
* Western chimpanzees (''Pan troglodytes verus'') are present in Outamba-Kilimi National Park. | * Western chimpanzees (''Pan troglodytes verus'') are present in Outamba-Kilimi National Park. | ||
* It has been estimated that 1,020 (CI: 658-1,596) individuals occur in the site. | * It has been estimated that 1,020 (CI: 658-1,596) individuals occur in the site. | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Site_characteristics-table" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Site_characteristics-table" | ||
|Species | |Species | ||
− | |Pan troglodytes verus | + | |'Pan troglodytes verus'' |
|- | |- | ||
|Area | |Area | ||
− | | | + | |1,109 km² |
|- | |- | ||
|Coordinates | |Coordinates | ||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
!Species | !Species | ||
!Year | !Year | ||
+ | !Occurrence | ||
+ | !Encounter or vistation rate (nests/km; ind/day) | ||
+ | !Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | ||
!Abundance estimate (95% CI) | !Abundance estimate (95% CI) | ||
− | ! | + | !Survey area |
− | ! | + | !Sampling method |
− | ! | + | !Analytical framework |
− | |||
!Source | !Source | ||
!Comments | !Comments | ||
Line 60: | Line 62: | ||
|''Pan troglodytes verus'' | |''Pan troglodytes verus'' | ||
|1983 | |1983 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |0.3 | ||
|49-60 | |49-60 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|Kilimi | |Kilimi | ||
|Reconnaissance walk | |Reconnaissance walk | ||
+ | | | ||
|Harding 1984 as cited by Brncic et al. 2010 | |Harding 1984 as cited by Brncic et al. 2010 | ||
|Reconnaissance walk | |Reconnaissance walk | ||
Line 71: | Line 75: | ||
|''Pan troglodytes verus'' | |''Pan troglodytes verus'' | ||
|1989 | |1989 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
|200-300 | |200-300 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|Outamba | |Outamba | ||
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
+ | | | ||
|Alp 1989 as cited by Brncic et al. 2010 | |Alp 1989 as cited by Brncic et al. 2010 | ||
|The population size was thought to be as high as 600-700 | |The population size was thought to be as high as 600-700 | ||
Line 82: | Line 88: | ||
|''Pan troglodytes verus'' | |''Pan troglodytes verus'' | ||
|2010 | |2010 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |8.9 (6.71-11.83) | ||
+ | |1.21 (0.78-1.88) | ||
|950 (615-1472) | |950 (615-1472) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|Outamba | |Outamba | ||
|Line transects | |Line transects | ||
+ | | | ||
|Brncic et al. 2010 | |Brncic et al. 2010 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 93: | Line 101: | ||
|''Pan troglodytes verus'' | |''Pan troglodytes verus'' | ||
|2010 | |2010 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |1.9 (0.61-6.41) | ||
+ | |0.27 (0.08-0.90) | ||
|70 (22-246) | |70 (22-246) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|Kilimi | |Kilimi | ||
|Line transects | |Line transects | ||
+ | | | ||
|Brncic et al. 2010 | |Brncic et al. 2010 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 104: | Line 114: | ||
|''Pan troglodytes verus'' | |''Pan troglodytes verus'' | ||
|2010 | |2010 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |0.97 (0.62-1.51) | ||
|1020 (658-1596) | |1020 (658-1596) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|Outamba-Kilimi | |Outamba-Kilimi | ||
|Line transects | |Line transects | ||
+ | | | ||
|Brncic et al. 2010 | |Brncic et al. 2010 | ||
| | | | ||
Line 126: | Line 138: | ||
!Year of threat | !Year of threat | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |4 Transportation & service corridors |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | |Absent |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |9 Pollution |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | |Absent |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |10 Geological events |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | |Absent |
− | | | + | | |
− | | | + | | |
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |12 Other threat |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
|Absent | |Absent | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |3 Energy production & mining | ||
+ | |3.2 Mining & quarrying | ||
+ | |High (more than 70% of population affected) | ||
+ | |Illegal gold mining activities in Outamba (Brncic et al. 2010). | ||
+ | |Ongoing (2010) | ||
|- | |- | ||
|5 Biological resource use | |5 Biological resource use | ||
|5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | |5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | ||
− | |High | + | |High (more than 70% of population affected) |
− | |High hunting intensity in the late 1960s and 1970s; hunting signs are still frequently found in the park (Brncic et al. 2010) | + | |High hunting intensity in the late 1960s and 1970s; hunting signs are still frequently found in the park (Brncic et al. 2010). |
|Ongoing (2010) | |Ongoing (2010) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |7 Natural system modifications |
− | | | + | |7.1 Fire & fire suppression |
− | | | + | |High (more than 70% of population affected) |
− | | | + | |Annual burning affects a large proportion of the park (Brncic et al. 2010). |
+ | |Ongoing (2010) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |1 Residential & commercial development | ||
+ | |1.1 Residential areas | ||
+ | |Low (up to 30% of population affected) | ||
+ | |A number of villages is located in both sections of the park (Brncic et al. 2010). | ||
|Ongoing (2010) | |Ongoing (2010) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |2 Agriculture & aquaculture | ||
+ | |2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | ||
+ | |Low (up to 30% of population affected) | ||
+ | |Small-scale subsistence farming and palm plantations (Kaiser pers. obs.). | ||
+ | |Ongoing (2019) | ||
|- | |- | ||
|5 Biological resource use | |5 Biological resource use | ||
|5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | |5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | ||
− | |Medium | + | |Medium (30-70% of population affected) |
− | |Signs of dam inside the park used for fishing activities (Kaiser pers. obs.) | + | |Signs of dam inside the park used for fishing activities (Kaiser pers. obs.). |
|Ongoing (2019) | |Ongoing (2019) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
|8 Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases | |8 Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases | ||
|8.2 Problematic native species | |8.2 Problematic native species | ||
− | |Medium | + | |Medium (30-70% of population affected) |
− | |Widespread zones of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) that degrade the forest edge (Kaiser pers. obs.) | + | |Widespread zones of elephant grass (''Pennisetum purpureum'') that degrade the forest edge (Kaiser pers. obs.). |
|Ongoing (2019) | |Ongoing (2019) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |2 Agriculture & aquaculture |
− | | | + | |2.3 Livestock farming & ranching |
− | | | + | |Present (unknown severity) |
− | | | + | |The northern part of Kilimi is used for cattle grazing (Brncic et al. 2010). |
− | | | + | |Ongoing (2010) |
+ | |- | ||
+ | |5 Biological resource use | ||
+ | |5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | ||
+ | |Present (unknown severity) | ||
+ | |Timber extraction in the northern part of Kilimi (Brncic et al. 2010). | ||
+ | |Ongoing (2010) | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |6 Human intrusions & disturbance |
− | | | + | |6.2 War, civil unrest & military exercises |
− | | | + | |Present (unknown severity) |
− | | | + | |The park’s infrastructure was destroyed and conservation Activities were brought to a halt due to civil war (Munro 2015). |
− | | | + | |1991-2002 |
|- | |- | ||
|11 Climate change & severe weather | |11 Climate change & severe weather | ||
| | | | ||
|Unknown | |Unknown | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
| | | |
Latest revision as of 09:56, 18 March 2025
West Africa > Sierra Leone > Outamba-Kilimi National Park
Français | Português | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | Melayu
Summary
- Western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) are present in Outamba-Kilimi National Park.
- It has been estimated that 1,020 (CI: 658-1,596) individuals occur in the site.
- The chimpanzee population trend is unknown.
- This site has a total size of 1,109 km².
- Key threats to chimpanzees is habitat destruction caused by intentional burning for agricultural activities and hunting, and mining.
- Conservation activities at the site mainly focus on providing sustainable livelihoods, but the progress and status of these projects are unknown.
Site characteristics
Situated in the north of Sierra Leone, Outamba-Kilimi National Park is divided into two blocks: Outamba (741 km²) and Kilimi (368 km²) (BirdLife International 2019). In the 1980s, with support from the IUCN and WWF, Geza Teleki, a primatologist and conservationist, was a driving force behind the establishment of Outamba-Kilimi National Park, which was finally declared as such in 1995 (Brncic et al. 2010, Munro 2015). In addition to the western chimpanzee, the site is home to forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis), Western red colobus monkeys (Piliocolobus badius), pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis), leopards (Panthera pardus), and forest buffalos (Brncic et al. 2010). With at least 256 bird species, the site is also an Important Bird Area (BirdLife International 2019).
Table 1. Basic site information for Outamba-Kilimi National Park
Species | 'Pan troglodytes verus |
Area | 1,109 km² |
Coordinates | Lat: 9.73 , Lon: -12.07 |
Type of site | Protected area (National Park) |
Habitat types | Subtropical/tropical dry forest, Subtropical/tropical lowland forest, Savanna |
Type of governance |
IUCN habitat categories Site designations
Ape status
The population size was estimated at 1,020 chimpanzees during a nationwide survey in 2010 (Brncic et al. 2010). Due to a lack of survey data, the population trend is unknown. Chimpanzee densities are higher in Outamba than in Kilimi (Brncic et al. 2010).
Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Outamba-Kilimi National Park
Species | Year | Occurrence | Encounter or vistation rate (nests/km; ind/day) | Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | Abundance estimate (95% CI) | Survey area | Sampling method | Analytical framework | Source | Comments | A.P.E.S. database ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pan troglodytes verus | 1983 | 0.3 | 49-60 | Kilimi | Reconnaissance walk | Harding 1984 as cited by Brncic et al. 2010 | Reconnaissance walk | ||||
Pan troglodytes verus | 1989 | 200-300 | Outamba | Unknown | Alp 1989 as cited by Brncic et al. 2010 | The population size was thought to be as high as 600-700 | |||||
Pan troglodytes verus | 2010 | 8.9 (6.71-11.83) | 1.21 (0.78-1.88) | 950 (615-1472) | Outamba | Line transects | Brncic et al. 2010 | ||||
Pan troglodytes verus | 2010 | 1.9 (0.61-6.41) | 0.27 (0.08-0.90) | 70 (22-246) | Kilimi | Line transects | Brncic et al. 2010 | ||||
Pan troglodytes verus | 2010 | 0.97 (0.62-1.51) | 1020 (658-1596) | Outamba-Kilimi | Line transects | Brncic et al. 2010 |
Threats
The export and trade of wild animals, especially chimpanzees, emerged as a lucrative enterprise in Sierra Leone in the 1920s (Munro 2015). Two prominent wildlife dealers, Franz Sitter and Suleiman Mansaray, exported approximately 2,000 chimpanzees in the 1970s alone (Munro 2015). After Outamba and Kilimi were proposed as game reserves in 1965, Franz Sitter intensified hunting to take as much wildlife as possible from these areas before they could be protected (Brncic et al. 2010). However, there are no signs of an ongoing chimpanzee trade.
Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Outamba-Kilimi National Park
Category | Specific threats | Threat level | Description | Year of threat |
---|---|---|---|---|
4 Transportation & service corridors | Absent | |||
9 Pollution | Absent | |||
10 Geological events | Absent | |||
12 Other threat | Absent | |||
3 Energy production & mining | 3.2 Mining & quarrying | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Illegal gold mining activities in Outamba (Brncic et al. 2010). | Ongoing (2010) |
5 Biological resource use | 5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | High (more than 70% of population affected) | High hunting intensity in the late 1960s and 1970s; hunting signs are still frequently found in the park (Brncic et al. 2010). | Ongoing (2010) |
7 Natural system modifications | 7.1 Fire & fire suppression | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Annual burning affects a large proportion of the park (Brncic et al. 2010). | Ongoing (2010) |
1 Residential & commercial development | 1.1 Residential areas | Low (up to 30% of population affected) | A number of villages is located in both sections of the park (Brncic et al. 2010). | Ongoing (2010) |
2 Agriculture & aquaculture | 2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | Low (up to 30% of population affected) | Small-scale subsistence farming and palm plantations (Kaiser pers. obs.). | Ongoing (2019) |
5 Biological resource use | 5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | Medium (30-70% of population affected) | Signs of dam inside the park used for fishing activities (Kaiser pers. obs.). | Ongoing (2019) |
8 Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases | 8.2 Problematic native species | Medium (30-70% of population affected) | Widespread zones of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) that degrade the forest edge (Kaiser pers. obs.). | Ongoing (2019) |
2 Agriculture & aquaculture | 2.3 Livestock farming & ranching | Present (unknown severity) | The northern part of Kilimi is used for cattle grazing (Brncic et al. 2010). | Ongoing (2010) |
5 Biological resource use | 5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | Present (unknown severity) | Timber extraction in the northern part of Kilimi (Brncic et al. 2010). | Ongoing (2010) |
6 Human intrusions & disturbance | 6.2 War, civil unrest & military exercises | Present (unknown severity) | The park’s infrastructure was destroyed and conservation Activities were brought to a halt due to civil war (Munro 2015). | 1991-2002 |
11 Climate change & severe weather | Unknown |
Conservation activities
Park guards funded by the government are stationed around the park to monitor and deter poaching and illegal mining. The site is a priority zone for the STEWARD program, which is a forest conservation and sustainable livelihoods program supported by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the United States Forest Service / International Programs (USFS/IP) (WCF 2015). The https://panverus.org/about/ Pan Verus Project] also aims to address the needs of local communities and find ways to provide sustainable agriculture practices and alternative livelihoods, for example, through tourism.
Table 4. Conservation activities reported for Outamba-Kilimi National Park
Category | Specific activity | Description | Implementing organization(s) | Year of activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
2 Counter-wildlife crime | 2.3 Conduct regular anti-poaching patrols | Government funded park guards stationed around park to monitor illegal poaching and mining (Kaiser pers. obs.) | Unknown | |
4 Education & awareness | 4.5 Implement multimedia campaigns using theatre, film, print media, discussions | The Wild Chimpanzee Foundation (WCF) organized an awareness raising theater play, which toured around the site (WCF 2011); discussion and showing camera trap images (PanAfrican Programme) | 2010, 2016/17 | |
5 Protection & restoration | 5.2 Legally protect ape habitat | The site is a national park since 1995 (Munro 2015) | Since 1995 |
Conservation activities list (Junker et al. 2017)
Challenges
Table 5. Challenges reported for Outamba-Kilimi National Park
Challenges | Specific challenges | Source | Year(s) |
---|---|---|---|
3 Engaged community | 3.1 General lack of community engagement or support | Brncic et al. 2010 | |
2 Resources and capacity | 2.5 Lack of equipment/transportation | Brncic et al. 2010 |
Enablers
Table 6. Enablers reported for Outamba-Kilimi National Park
Enablers | Specific enablers | Source | Year(s) |
---|---|---|---|
1 Site management | |||
2 Resources and capacity | |||
3 Engaged community | |||
4 Institutional support | |||
5 Ecological context | |||
6 Safety and stability |
Research activities
Outamba-Kilimi was a temporary research site for the PanAfrican Programme based at the Max-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Documented behaviours
Table 7. Behaviours documented for Outamba-Kilimi National Park
Behavior | Source |
---|---|
Algae scooping | Kühl et al. 2019 |
Ant dipping | Kühl et al. 2019 |
Ant eating | Kühl et al. 2019 |
Stepping sticks | Alp 1997 |
Seat sticks | Alp 1997 |
Exposure to climate change impacts
External links
Relevant datasets
References
Alp, R. 1997. "Stepping-sticks" and "seat-sticks": new types of tools used by wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in Sierra Leone. American Journal of Primatology, 41(1):45-52.
BirdLife International. 2019. Important Bird Areas factsheet: Outamba-Kilimi National Park. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 19/07/2019.
Brncic, T.M., Amarasekaran,B. & McKenna,A. 2010. Final Report of the Sierra Leone National Chimpanzee Census Project. Tacugama Chimpanzee Sanctuary, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Kühl HS et al. 2019. Human impact erodes chimpanzee behavioral diversity, Science 363, 1453–1455
Munro, P. 2015. Geza Teleki and the Emergence of Sierra Leone’s Wildlife Conservation Movement. Primate Conservation, (29):115-122. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1896/052.029.0112
Wild Chimpanzee Foundation (WCF). 2011. Report on Education and Awareness Activities to improve the protection of wild chimpanzees and their habitat in West Africa, undertaken by the Wild Chimpanzee Foundation. Report online: https://www.wildchimps.org/fileadmin/content_files/pdfs/reports/2010-Education_Ecotour_yearly-report_2010_April-2011.pdf
Wild Chimpanzee Foundation (WCF). 2015. Baseline Assessment of Chimpanzee and Elephant Populations in the Mano River Union Countries – Côte d’Ivoire, Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea (2007-2014). Report online: https://www.wildchimps.org/fileadmin/content_files/pdfs/reports/STEWARD_Report_on_chimpanzee_and_elephant_Status_MRU_FINAL.pdf
Page created by: M. Kaiser & A.P.E.S. Wiki team Date: NA