Lomako-Yokokala Faunal Reserve
Central Africa > Democratic Republic of the Congo > Lomako-Yokokala Faunal Reserve
Summary
- Bonobo (Pan paniscus) are present in Lomako-Yokokala Faunal Reserve.
- It has been estimated that XXXXX (CI: XXXX-XXXX) individuals occur in the site.
- The Bonobo population trend is increasing.
- The site has a total size of 3,625 km².
- Key threats to Bonobo is hunting.
- Conservation activities have focused on regular anti-poaching patrols and primate’s habituation
- OPTIONAL: SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS
Site characteristics
Lomako-Yokokala (Réserve de Faune de Lomako-Yokokala, RFLY) was designated as Faunal Reserve in 2006. In addition to bonobos, other species found at the site include the endemic Congo peacock (Pierard et al, 1999), golden cat, giant pangolin (Omasombo et al, 2005), and forest elephants (Maputla et al. 2020). The reserve, situated in the Maringa-Lopori-Wamba landscape, is bordered by the Lomako and Yokokala Rivers in the north and south, respectively. RFLY is a Category IV protected area (IUCN) and one of the KBAs (BirdLife International, 2020). Table 1. Basic site information for Lomako-Yokokala Faunal Reserve
| Area | 3,625 km² | ||
| 0.994 N, 21.168 W | |||
| Designation | 2006 | ||
| Habitat types | Forest – Subtropical/tropical dry | Forest – Subtropical/tropical moist lowland | Forest – Subtropical/tropical swamp |
Ape status
The Lomako is renowned for research on bonobos that started in the 1970's (Badrian and Badrian). End of 1980's - early 1990's, creation of a Lomako Protected area was proposed despite little knowledge of that status of the bonobo in the larger area (Dupain et al, 2000; Dupain & Van Elsacker, 2001), but political turmoil halted this initiative. Bonobo research projects continued though (Susman, 1984, Fruth and Hohman, 1993, Dupain et al, 1996). The Central African Regional Program for Environment identified the Maringa Lopori Wamba Landscape centered around the Lomako forest (see https://carpe.umd.edu/sites/default/files/THE_FORESTS_OF_THE_CONGO_BASIN_State_of_the_Forest_2006.pdf) and allowed for the creation of the Lomako Yokokala Faunal Reserve (3625km²) in 2006. The total bonobo population was estimated at about 910 (497-1668) (A.Vosper, 2010). More recent surveys and anecdotical observations indicate that the bonobo population is growing and expanding throughout the protected area and is currently probably well over 1000individuals. Table 2. Ape population estimates in Lomako-Yokokala Faunal Reserve
| Species | Year | Abundance estimate (95% CI) | Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | Encounter rate (nests/km) | Area | Method | Source | Comments | A.P.E.S. database ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pan paniscus | 2004 | ABUNDANCE ESTIMATE | DENSITY ESTIMATE | ENCOUNTER RATE | Lomako-Yokokala Faunal Reserve | Line transects (Distance) | Omasombo et al. 2005 | 81 beds/km2
in the L-plot, and 12 beds/km2 in the Y-plot |
|
| SCIENTIFIC SPECIES NAME | YEAR | ABUNDANCE ESTIMATE | DENSITY ESTIMATE | ENCOUNTER RATE | AREA | METHOD | SOURCE | COMMENTS |
Threats
Hunting/poaching has been and still is the prime threat for the bonobos in the Lomako forest. (Thompson-Handler et al., 1995, Dupain & Van Elsacker 2001, Dupain, 2003). Since its creation in 2006, RFLY has been managed by the Congolese Institute for the Conservation of Nature (ICCN). The status of all biodiversity in the protected area has been improving, with amongst others also forest elephants coming back. Thanks to long term investments and relationships with the local communities, there is currently very limited threat to the protected area. The major threat today would be the stop of support for the management of the RFLY. Table 3. Threats to apes in Lomako-Yokokala Faunal Reserve
| Category | Specific threats | Threat level | Quantified severity | Description | Year of threat | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Residential & commercial development | SPECIFIC THREAT | LEVEL | QUANTIFIED THREAT | DESCRIPTION | YEAR OF THREAT | |||||
| 2. Agriculture & aquaculture | SPECIFIC THREAT | LEVEL | QUANTIFIED THREAT | DESCRIPTION | YEAR OF THREAT | |||||
| 3. Energy production & mining | SPECIFIC THREAT | LEVEL | QUANTIFIED THREAT | DESCRIPTION | YEAR OF THREAT | |||||
| 4. Transportation & service corridors | SPECIFIC THREAT | LEVEL | QUANTIFIED THREAT | DESCRIPTION | YEAR OF THREAT | |||||
| 5. Biological resource use | 5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | Present, but threat severity unknown | 35 hunting camps were recorded in a 2004 survey (Omasombo et al. 2005) | Commercial poaching (Dupain et al., 2005; Fruth et al. 2016). Hunting pressure has been especially strong in the northern part of the reserve (Dupain et al. 2000). | Ongoing (2016, 2020) | 5. Biological resource use | 5.2 Gathering terrestrial plants | Present, but threat severity unknown | The southern part of the reserve suffers from exploitation of forest products as alternatives to the declining coffee,
rubber, and palm oil businesses (Dupain et al. 2000). |
Ongoing (2000; much less 2020) |
| 6. Human intrusion & disturbance | Unknown | |||||||||
| 7. Natural system modifications | Unknown | |||||||||
| 8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | Unknown | |||||||||
| 9. Pollution | Unknown | |||||||||
| 10. Geological Events | Absent | |||||||||
| 11. Climate change & severe weather | Unknown | |||||||||
| 12. Other options | Absent |
Conservation activities
The site is managed by Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (ICCN) with support from the ARCUS foundation through the African Wildlife Foundation (AWF) (Arcus Foundation 2020). Due to performance-based management, with a focus on efficient law enforcement and community outreach, RFLY is witnessing increasing numbers of all fauna. The Antwerp Zoo Foundation (AZF) of the Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp, together with a Congolese NGO, Juristes pour le Renforcement et l’Application de la Loi dans le secteur de l’Environnement (JURISTRALE), signed a memorandum of understanding with the DRC National Office of Tourism and ICCN in 2019 and 2020, respectively, to prepare the Lomako for the tourism and scientific research that focus on bonobos. Table 4. Conservation activities in Lomako-Yokokala Faunal Reserve
| Category | Specific activity | Description | Year of activity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Residential & commercial development | Specific activity OR Not reported | Description | Year of activity |
| 2. Agriculture & aquaculture | Not reported | ||
| 3. Energy production & mining | Not reported | ||
| 4. Transportation & service corridors | Not reported | ||
| 5. Biological resource use | 5.6. Conduct regular anti-poaching patrols | Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (ICCN) manages the patrol of rangers. | Ongoing (2021) |
| 6. Human intrusion & disturbance | Not reported | ||
| 7. Natural system modifications | Not reported | ||
| 8. Invasive & other problematic species, genes, diseases | Not reported | ||
| 9. Pollution | Not reported | ||
| 10. Education & Awareness | 10.2. Involve local community in primate research and conservation management | Habituation efforts of bonobos is ongoing with field assistants from local communities. | Ongoing (2021) |
| 11. Habitat Protection | Not reported | ||
| 12. Species Management | 12.1. Habituate primates to human presence to reduce stress from tourists/researchers etc. | Habituation efforts of bonobos is ongoing with field assistants from local communities. | Ongoing (2021) |
| 13. Livelihood; Economic & Other Incentives | Not reported |
Challenges
Management of RFLY by ICCN has been financially supported by conservation NGOs. If financial support from outside would stop, ranger patrol of ICCN would also stop. Table 5. Challenges reported for Lomako-Yokokala Faunal Reserve
| Challenge | Source |
|---|---|
| Lack of financial means | Dupain (pers, communication) |
Research activities
Lomako forest has been known as a long-term study site of bonobos since 1974 (Badrian & Badrian 1977; White 1996), with teams from a number of universities and institutes (Stony Brook University, Max Planck Institute, Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp, Antwerp University, etc.) attempting to set up long-term research sites (Dupain & Van Elsacker 2001). Since the creation of the RFLY in 2006, intermittent efforts to habituate bonobos for tourism and scientific research continued until 2018. In 2019-2020, most bonobos in one group (named Tolende group) were well habituated to the presence of observers, allowing for behavioral studies (Sakamaki et al. 2020).
Documented behaviours
Table 6. Ape behaviors reported for Lomako-Yokokala Faunal Reserve
| Behavior | Source |
|---|---|
| Hunting and meat eating | Wakefield et al. 2019 |
| Leaf swallowing | Dupain et al. 2002 |
External links
XXXXXXXXXX XXX
Relevant datasets
References
Arcus Foundation. (2020, February 14). A Rare View of the Forgotten Ape: Documenting Bonobos in Their Natural Habitat. Retrieved October 26, 2020, from https://www.arcusfoundation.org/blog/great-apes/a-rare-view-of-the-forgotten-ape-documenting-bonobos-in-their-natural-habitat/
Badrian A, Badrian N. (1977) Pygmy chimpanzees. Oryx, 14, 463–468. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605300014502
Dupain, J., Van Krunkelsven, E., Van Elsacker, L., & Verheyen, R. F. (2000). Current status of the bonobo (Pan paniscus) in the proposed Lomako Reserve (Democratic Republic of Congo). Biological Conservation, 94, 265–272.
Dupain J, Van Elsacker L. (2001) Status of the proposed Lomako Forest Bonobo Reserve: a case study of the bushmeat trade. In: All apes great and small volume 1: African apes. Galdikas BMF, Briggs N, Sheeran LK, Shapiro GL, Goodall J (eds), Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp:259–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47461-1_25
Dupain J, Van Elsacker L, Nell C, Garcia P, Ponce F, Huffman MA. (2002) New evidence for leaf swallowing and Oesophagostomum infection in bonobos (Pan paniscus). International Journal of Primatology, 23, 1053-1062.
Dupain, J. (2003). The proposed Lomako Forest Reserve of the Democratic Republic of Congo:
urgent action needed. Oryx. Vol. 37(4), 3-4.
Fruth, B., Hickey, J.R., André, C., Furuichi, T., Hart, J., Hart, T., Kuehl, H., Maisels, F., Nackoney, J., Reinartz, G., Sop, T., Thompson, J. & Williamson, E.A. (2016). Pan paniscus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T15932A102331567. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-2.RLTS.T15932A17964305.en
Maputla N, Lushimba A, Kasa P, Facheux C, Muruthi P. (2020). First record of a breeding forest elephant herd in the Lomako Yokokala Faunal Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo. Afr J Ecol, 58, 537–539. https ://doi.org/10.1111/aje.12725
Omasombo,V., Bokelo,D. & Dupain, J. (2005). Current Status of Bonobos and Other Large Mammals in the Proposed Forest Reserve of Lomako-Yokokala, Equateur Province, Democratic Republic of Congo. Pan Africa News, 12(2), 14-17.
Pierard,M., Dupain,J. & Van Elsacker,L. (1999) The Congo Peacock Afropavo congensis in the Lomako Forest, Equateur Province. Afropavo, 5.
Sakamakai T, Mashini C, Dupain J. 2020. Development of bonobo tourism in the Lomako Yokokala Faunal Reserve, DRC. Pan Africa News xx: xx–xx.
Thompson-Handler,N., Malenky, R. K., and Reinartz, G.E., 1995: Action plan for Pan paniscus: report on free-ranging populations and Proposals for their Preservation. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Zoological society of Milwaukee County.
Wakefield ML, Hickmott AJ, Brand CM, Takaoka IY, Meador LM, Waller MT, White FJ. (2019) New observations of meat eating and sharing in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Iyema, Lomako Forest Reserve, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Folia Primatol, 90, 179–189.
White FJ. (1996) Pan paniscus 1973 to 1996: Twenty-three years of field research. Evolutionary Anthropology, 5, 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1002(SICI)1520-6505(1996)5:1%3C11::AID-EVAN5%3E3.0.CO;2-Z
XXXXX
Page completed by: Jef Dupain, jdupain65@gmail.com Date: 08/02/2021