duser, Administrators
731
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 6:
Line 6:
!Method
|Present
|Present
|Present
|1.14 chimpanzee signs /km
|0.46
−|
|1.33
−|6.58
|3.2 Mining & quarrying+|Present+|Exploration for iron ore, activities seem to have ceased, but current threat level not clear (METT 2009, UNESCO 2018b)+|Unknown (2018)+|-
−|4 Transportation & service corridors
−|-
−|6 Human intrusions & disturbance
−|
−|Absent
−|
−|
|
−|
−|-
−|10 Geological events
−|
−|Absent
|
−|
−|-
−|12 Other threat
−|
−|Absent
= Summary =
= Summary =
−<div style="float: right">{{#display_map: height=190px | width=300px | scrollzoom=off | zoom=5 | layers= OpenStreetMap, OpenTopoMap|7.64, -8.41~[[Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve]]~Pan troglodytes verus}}</div>
+<div style="float: right">{{#display_map: height=190px | width=300px | scrollzoom=off | zoom=5 | layers= OpenStreetMap, OpenTopoMap|7.64, -8.41~[[Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve]]~'Pan troglodytes verus''}}</div>
* Western chimpanzees (''Pan troglodytes verus'') are present in Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve.
* Western chimpanzees (''Pan troglodytes verus'') are present in Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve.
* There is an ongoing study to determine the chimpanzee population size (Koops et al. in prep.).
* There is an ongoing study to determine the chimpanzee population size (Koops et al. in prep.).
Line 25:
Line 25:
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Site_characteristics-table"
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Site_characteristics-table"
|Species
|Species
−|Pan troglodytes verus
+|'Pan troglodytes verus''
|-
|-
|Area
|Area
Line 53:
Line 53:
!Species
!Species
!Year
!Year
+!Occurrence
+!Encounter or vistation rate (nests/km; ind/day)
+!Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI)
!Abundance estimate (95% CI)
!Abundance estimate (95% CI)
−!Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI)
+!Survey area
−!Encounter rate (nests/km)
+!Sampling method
−!Area
+!Analytical framework
−!Source
!Source
!Comments
!Comments
Line 64:
Line 66:
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|1991
|1991
+|Present
+|
|
|
|
|
−|North of Goera
|North of Goera
|Reconnaissance walk
|Reconnaissance walk
+|
|Sugiyama 1995
|Sugiyama 1995
|Reconnaissance survey
|Reconnaissance survey
Line 75:
Line 79:
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|1999
|1999
+|Present
+|
|
|
|
|
−|North east of Seringbara village
|North east of Seringbara village
|Reconnaissance walk
|Reconnaissance walk
+|
|Shimada 2000
|Shimada 2000
|Reconnaissance survey
|Reconnaissance survey
Line 86:
Line 92:
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|1999
|1999
+|Present
+|
|
|
|
|
−|North of Goera
|North of Goera
|Reconnaissance walk
|Reconnaissance walk
+|
|Shimada 2000
|Shimada 2000
|Reconnaissance survey
|Reconnaissance survey
Line 97:
Line 105:
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|2006-2008
|2006-2008
+|
+|1.14
|
|
|
|
−|Eastern part of the reserve
|Eastern part of the reserve
|Line transects & recces
|Line transects & recces
+|
|Granier 2011
|Granier 2011
|Total survey effort: 350 km; combination of line transect, reconnaissance survey and scouting surveys
|Total survey effort: 350 km; combination of line transect, reconnaissance survey and scouting surveys
Line 108:
Line 118:
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|2009-2011
|2009-2011
+|
+|
+|0.46
|8-39
|8-39
−|Southern slope of Nimba Mountains [covered Guinean section (10km2) and Côte d’Ivoirian section (50km²)]
|Southern slope of Nimba Mountains [covered Guinean section (10km2) and Côte d’Ivoirian section (50km²)]
|Line transects & recces
|Line transects & recces
+|
|Granier et al. 2014
|Granier et al. 2014
|Total survey effort: 78.21 km; combination of line transect and reconnaissance survey, abundance and density estimate only based on transects (i.e., 12.5 km)
|Total survey effort: 78.21 km; combination of line transect and reconnaissance survey, abundance and density estimate only based on transects (i.e., 12.5 km)
Line 119:
Line 131:
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|2009
|2009
+|
+|6.58
+|1.33
|166
|166
−|Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (i.e., Guinean part of Nimba Mountains)
|Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (i.e., Guinean part of Nimba Mountains)
|Line transects
|Line transects
+|
|WCF 2012
|WCF 2012
|Total survey effort: 59.4 km
|Total survey effort: 59.4 km
Line 148:
Line 162:
|
|
|-
|-
−|2 Agriculture & aquaculture
+|6 Human intrusions & disturbance
−|2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops
+|
−|Medium
+|Absent
−|Agricultural activities especially in the northern part around Seringbara and towards the border with Liberia (METT 2009, WCF 2012)
+|
−|Ongoing (2012)
+|
|-
|-
−|2 Agriculture & aquaculture
+|10 Geological events
−|2.3 Livestock farming & ranching
+|
−|Present
+|Absent
−|Present (METT 2009, UNESCO 2018b), level of threat not known
+|
−|Ongoing (2018)
+|
|-
|-
−|3 Energy production & mining
+|12 Other threat
−|
−|Absent
−|
−|
−|4.1 Roads & railroads
−|Present
−|Tarmacking of a road passing by the reserve in planning and would reinforce anthropogenic pressures such as poaching and illegal wood extraction (UNESCO 2018b), signs of paths inside reserve (WCF 2012)
−|Ongoing (2018)
|-
|-
|5 Biological resource use
|5 Biological resource use
|5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals
|5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals
−|High
+|High (more than 70% of population affected)
−|Most prevalent sign of human activity inside the reserve (WCF 2012), also confirmed by BirdLife International 2018b, METT 2009, Shimada 2000, UNESCO 2018b
+|Most prevalent sign of human activity inside the reserve (WCF 2012), also confirmed by BirdLife International 2018b, METT 2009, Shimada 2000, UNESCO 2018b.
+|2000-Ongoing (2018)
+|-
+|2 Agriculture & aquaculture
+|2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops
+|Medium (30-70% of population affected)
+|Agricultural activities especially in the northern part around Seringbara and towards the border with Liberia (METT 2009, WCF 2012).
|Ongoing (2012)
|Ongoing (2012)
|-
|-
|5 Biological resource use
|5 Biological resource use
|5.2 Gathering terrestrial plants
|5.2 Gathering terrestrial plants
−|Medium
+|Medium (30-70% of population affected)
|Collection of medicinal plants (BirdLife International 2018b)
|Collection of medicinal plants (BirdLife International 2018b)
|Ongoing (2018)
|Ongoing (2018)
Line 186:
Line 200:
|5 Biological resource use
|5 Biological resource use
|5.3 Logging & wood harvesting
|5.3 Logging & wood harvesting
−|Medium
+|Medium (30-70% of population affected)
−|Wood extraction (WCF 2012)
+|Wood extraction (WCF 2012).
|Ongoing (2012)
|Ongoing (2012)
−|-
|-
|7 Natural system modifications
|7 Natural system modifications
|7.1 Fire & fire suppression
|7.1 Fire & fire suppression
−|Medium
+|Medium (30-70% of population affected)
−|Fires used to clear land for agricultural and cattle grazing (METT 2009, UNESCO 2018b, WCF 2012)
+|Fires used to clear land for agricultural and cattle grazing (METT 2009, UNESCO 2018b, WCF 2012).
+|2009-Ongoing (2018)
+|-
+|2 Agriculture & aquaculture
+|2.3 Livestock farming & ranching
+|Present (unknown severity)
+|Present (METT 2009, UNESCO 2018b), level of threat not known.
+|Ongoing (2018)
+|-
+|3 Energy production & mining
+|3.2 Mining & quarrying
+|Present (unknown severity)
+|Exploration for iron ore, activities seem to have ceased, but current threat level not clear (METT 2009, UNESCO 2018b).
+|Unknown (2018)
+|-
+|4 Transportation & service corridors
+|4.1 Roads & railroads
+|Present (unknown severity)
+|Tarmacking of a road passing by the reserve in planning and would reinforce anthropogenic pressures such as poaching and illegal wood extraction (UNESCO 2018b), signs of paths inside reserve (WCF 2012).
|Ongoing (2018)
|Ongoing (2018)
|-
|-
Line 211:
Line 237:
|
|
|Unknown
|Unknown
−|
|
|
|
Line 223:
Line 243:
|
|
|Unknown
|Unknown
−|
|
|
|