1,197 bytes added
, 18 June
'''1. Site management''' <br>
1.1 Effective leadership
1.2 Effective coordination
1.3 Adaptive management practices
'''2. Resources and capacity''' <br>
2.1 Sufficient staff
2.2 Sufficient funding
2.3 Continuous/long-term funding
2.4 Adequate data to inform and evaluate conservation actions
2.5 Sufficient capacity/expertise to advise, design, or implement actions
2.6 External partnerships that add expertise or resources
'''3. Engaged community''' <br>
3.1 Strong local environmental knowledge
3.2 Local taboos in favor of conservation
3.3 Volunteer workforce
3.4 Anticipated advantages/benefits of conservation activities
3.5 Positive past experience/associations with conservation (e.g. postivie image of conservation)
3.6 Local community engagement and support
3.7 Site has high cultural/religious value
'''4. Institutional support''' <br>
4.1 Effective legislation and law enforcement
4.2 Strong government support
4.3 Strong transboundary cooperation
'''5. Ecological context''' <br>
5.1 Ecological characteristics (e.g. terrain) conducive to conservation <br>
'''6. Safety and stability''' <br>
6.1 Political and economic stability
6.2 Social and civil security
'''Other (specify)''' <br>